Plasma should not work! At least it should not work as a TV display system. At best, it should provide a nice, even light surface - suitable for decorative effect, and maybe, with a strong south wind, work as some type of test display. That was the thinking about thirty years ago. But today, "Plasma" (a.k.a. Gas Discharge) is one of two technologies presently being employed for flat panel TV displays - the other being LCD. Although plasma displays have been around for several years, only relatively recently has this technology been applied to television. Earlier Plasma uses were relegated to flat alphanumeric displays, but other, more efficient technologies such as LCD, LED et al have replaced Plasma in these applications. Now, however, two display systems - Plasma and LCD - are in somewhat of a "race" to determine which will dominate the flat panel TV market. At this point in time both technologies have staked out their marketing territories. LCD is most economically applied to screen sizes below 40" in diameter (16x9). Panel costs and performance limitations above that size become prohibitive for CE applications, and Plasma becomes a viable alternative. Plasma, however, does not economically "scale down" as efficiently as LCD in screen sizes below about 40." This is primarily because the plasma panel and driving electronics costs do not decrease in linear proportion to screen size. Secondarily, large panel LCD displays suffer from uniform performance problems, negatively affecting production yield. As a result, large LCD panels have a 20% to 25% cost disadvantage over Plasma. Therefore, for the time being, Plasma is the most economic technology for larger flat panel HDTV displays.
How plasma displays operate is quite interesting. You probably know the basic operation, but, if not, here is a quick review. Figure 1 illustrates schematically a very basic plasma cell. (Three cells, one for each primary color - Red, Green and Blue - comprise a "pixel.") When a voltage (100 to 200 volts), called the "ignition" voltage, is applied across a glass cell containing Xenon gas, the gas ionizes, creating a stream of charged particles (Plasma). This plasma discharge emits a wide spectrum of electromagnetic energy including ultraviolet light. This ultraviolet energy, in turn, impinges on a phosphor coating, causing the phosphor to emit visible light, the color depending on the type of phosphor. The arrays of electrodes connected to each cell are called "Display" and "Address" electrodes respectively. Each cell is "fired" when the voltage between its respective display and address electrodes equally the ignition voltage.
In actual application the applied cell voltage is AC not DC. It was found in early plasma display development that AC pulses provided a much more efficient and consistent display for larger panels. A diagram of the AC voltage pulses applied to the cells is shown in Figure 2. The "Ignition" pulse quickly "fires" the cell; the AC "Sustaining" pulses maintain the plasma output; while the "Quenching" pulse provides for quick extinguishing of the plasma discharge. Now, if you become faint when being confronted with a somewhat involved technical discussion, please feel free to jump to the last paragraph of this article, and you can consider it having been read. If you wish a more detailed discussion, albeit simplified, of the concept used to drive plasma displays, please read on.
Note from Figure 3, that if the cell were fired for each subfield, the total brightness output would have a relative value of 15 (1+2+4+8). This means that such a four-bit system would generate 64 different brightness levels and over ¼ million different color values, assuming three cells per pixel. In actual practice, each frame is divided into as many as 10 to 20 subfields in order to achieve much finer brightness gradients and improve linearity. Now, that wasn't so bad, was it? Plasma panels have five distinct advantages: first, and most important, is that the form factor is thin and flat, finally delivering the much desired "hang on the wall" large screen television display; secondly, Plasma generates its own light - no need for a separate backlight; third, the viewing angle is 180° - providing fixed brightness with no distortion regardless of the position of the viewer; forth, there are no optical components such as lenses and prisms to reduce resolution - resulting in a very sharp display; and fifth, Plasma is a purely digital display - eliminating linearity distortions caused by digital to analog converters. Plasma has overcome most of its earlier problems such as low brightness and contrast, poor black level performance, white compression and noise caused by digital artifacts. In addition, plasma panel prices that have been prohibitively high are now within the range of a viable mass consumer product. This is the best of all worlds, and it will get better. Ed Reader Commentaryherbdrake • Jan 26, 10:59am
This article hails Plasma displays with little mention of its traditional downside -- the "burn-in" or "aging" problem. I have heard the comment that this problem was solved long ago, but nobody seems willing to put that in writing. The reality, at the present state of the transition to DTV/HDTV, is that people HD set owners still spend a lot of time watching non-wide-screen programming, whether that comes from an antenna, a cable box, a satellite box, or even from an HDTV broadcaster doing an up-conversion of 4:3 material. Plasma sets generally seem to protect themselves by going to a stretch or zoom mode when this kind of picture is tuned in. Were they to not do so, there would be the danger that the center of the screen (that portion used for 4:3 aspect programs) ages more quickly than the area to the left and right that is only used for wide-screen aspect programs. Eventually, the wide-screen program suffer because the portion of the image in the center would be dimmer than the ... More from Ed Milbourn
More in Category: Technology
About Ed MilbournAfter graduating from Purdue University with degrees in Electrical Engineering and Industrial Education in 1961 and 1963 respectively, Ed Milbourn joined the RCA Home Entertainment Division in 1963. During his thirty-eight year career with RCA (later GE and Thomson multimedia), Mr. Milbourn held the positions of Field Service Engineer, Manager of Technical Training and Manager of Sales Training. In 1987, he joined Thomson's Product Management group as Manager of Advanced Television Systems Planning, with responsibilities including Digital Television and High Definition Television Product Management. Mr. Milbourn retired from Thomson multimedia in December 2001, and is now a Consumer Electronics Industry consultant. |
advertisement
Authors
Categories
Other Recent Discussion
|
||||||||