![]() |
Ed's View - 3DTV - Why Not Glasses? | |
|
By Ed Milbourn Correspondent Posted on January 30, 2007 Category: Technology |
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Del.icio.us
Save
Email
Print |
|
Receive instant notification of new articles:
Register Now to receive notification of new HDTV Magazine Articles via email as soon as they are published. At least at the start.
There is no doubt (at least in my little mind) that the next big step in television development is the addition of the third dimension - i.e. "3DTV." Interestingly, virtually all of the technical elements are in place to commercialize fully compatible 3DTV.
The one caveat to this statement is the acceptance of the use of viewing glasses, at least in the initial system designs. This is certainly a big commercial "if," but the display system design without the use of eye-level polarizing filters (glasses) would delay consumer introduction of 3DTV significantly. Otherwise the key technical elements are ready to be systemized. Here are the salient reasons 3DTV could be very close:
Indeed, a fully compatible first generation 3D television system is possible with very few, if any, changes in the present ATSC standard. To be certain, as time advances, many esoteric holography based 3DTV systems will be developed and deployed. Eventually these second and third generation 3DTV systems will be found in commercial and home applications, but not in any reasonable time-frame.
In the meantime, we could see our present HDTV system evolve to 3D capability if we are willing to initially accept the simple addition of inexpensive, comfortable polarizing filters - just like the movies.
Sphere: Related ContentPosted by Ed Milbourn, January 30, 2007 12:09 PM
Reader Commentary Jan 30, 4:08pm Ed...I know you've commented extensively about DirecTV's problems with their latest TIVO-type product. If you were a DirecTV subscriber now that wanted the same service that I have with my wonderful DirecTV TIVO on a "regular" TV and am purchasing an HD Jan 30, 5:32pm Don't confuse 3D graphics with stereoscopic photography. 3D graphics do not need glasses as the 3D image is based on persprctive. In stereoscopic photography the left eye see the left image and the right eye sees the right image. There are a couple of way Jan 31, 7:15am Ed & company, Is the hangup regarding glasses just that special ones, no matter how cheap are needed, or that they must be quite expensive? If display technology progresses (or has progressed) to that level that two simultaneous but differently po Feb 2, 3:41pm Dear Mr. Milbourn, I was very interested in your article and was just wondering if you are aware of our company - Dynamic Digital Depth? We are involved in the 3D (sterescopic) industry and have glasses free 3D mobile phones, polarized glasses based 3 Feb 3, 10:38am I am of a certain age...I remember 3D movies when they came out in the 1950's. I especially remember watching a spectacular version of Hondo, starring John Wayne. It was shot in technicolor and used polarized glasses, not the red and green ones that were More on Technology
More from Ed Milbourn
About Ed MilbournAfter graduating from Purdue University with degrees in Electrical Engineering and Industrial Education in 1961 and 1963 respectively, Ed Milbourn joined the RCA Home Entertainment Division in 1963. During his thirty-eight year career with RCA (later GE and Thomson multimedia), Mr. Milbourn held the positions of Field Service Engineer, Manager of Technical Training and Manager of Sales Training. In 1987, he joined Thomson's Product Management group as Manager of Advanced Television Systems Planning, with responsibilities including Digital Television and High Definition Television Product Management. Mr. Milbourn retired from Thomson multimedia in December 2001, and is now a Consumer Electronics Industry consultant. |
Other Recent Discussion
Authors
Categories
|