The following article is the latest in the 2008 HDTV Buyers Guide series. Other articles in this series are as follows:
The following topics are covered in this segment:
HDTV as a System, not Just a TV Set
While performing the viewing tests decide if your sitting arrangement would need to be movable to adapt to the quality of the viewing material (closer for HDTV, farther back for NTSC), or perhaps it would be better to select a fixed viewing position at a compromise point in between, adequate to the viewing of both.
Viewing distances might look well at the store but might be physically constrained by your actual room dimensions, and your planned sitting arrangements; remember to use your actual room's viewing distance measurements for store tests, and confirm at home. You might conclude that is better to reduce the screen size for all things to fit, or that you should consider a larger screen than you originally thought.
Assuming you will use the HDTV with a multi-channel audio system (otherwise disregard all the statements relevant to this subject), evaluate how moving a couple of feet away from the screen to make a weak image acceptable might affect the audio sweet spot due to standing waves, or the listener distance from the speakers, and room boundaries.
This test most probably would be done separately; the video test at the store to determine viewing distance, and the audio test at home with your own audio equipment using the video distances confirmed at the store. But the result might be very subjective until both video and audio equipment are together in the same room.
You could conclude that might be better to relocate the speakers so the multi-channel sweet spot matches the viewing spot. Or you could start with your preferred sound sweet spot and adapt the screen size of the HDTV so the viewing sweet spot coincides with the sound sweet spot. If that is your case you better know all this in advance, before you commit to a screen size based only on viewing reasons.
If all this gets too complicated and you just want to keep it simple with some surround in the room, you should concentrate on the viewing factors of this article.
While we are on this topic I would like to mention that the use of any TV's small speakers (and small amps within the TV) as alternative for a missing center channel speaker on your surround system is not recommended as a permanent home-theater setup. The dialog and much of the sound of a movie comes from the center channel, estimated in the order of 60% of the movie soundtrack.
When using the TV's small amp/speakers in a home theater their capacity to handle loud passages would be exceeded (and distortion would occur) much earlier than the L/R speakers/amp of the audio system, assuming the audio system is more powerful than the TV audio, as typically is. The effect could be worst if the system does not have a subwoofer to redirect the low frequencies from a small center speaker and surrounds. The distortion on the center channel would affect the clarity of the dialog over loud passages.
Additionally, sounds that are panning side-to-side would have different timbre while switching among speakers (from left to TV center to right) accompanying the video movement in that direction. Voices of people walking side-to-side will change their tone as they enter the TV's center speaker and as they depart from it.
While these are home-theater considerations, if the HDTV is to become a centerpiece for your home theater then the issues would require attention sooner or later. Plan for installing front (L/C/R) speakers with matching timbre and size, and plan for equal amplification for those three.
Recording and Digital Connections
Decide if HD recording is a feature you would need at all, and if you do, identify if it is for long term archiving or temporary time shifting. HD time shifting recording is possible using HD DVRs (Digital Video Recorder, similar to TiVo) from cable and satellite services.
If you actually need to do archiving in HD resolution, three manufacturers of HD-VHS VCRs (JVC, Marantz, and Mitsubishi) introduced their models several years ago. Although that format has not been as popular than regular VHS, you might still find some of those units in the market.
HD-VHS VCRs record HD tapes from their IEEE 1394 (FireWire) input connection only, which requires the tuning device (integrated HDTV or HD-STB) to have that output as well. Some integrated TV sets have IEEE 1394 connectors but without output capabilities, or they are for video camcorder purposes only.
DirecTV HD-STBs do not have the IEEE 1394 output, Dish Network HD-STBs neither, although the company once had the intention a few years ago to enable that connection on their 921 DVR model, which is already discontinued.
Most prerecorded HD-VHS movies released use D-Theater content protection, and are playable on JVC and Marantz compatible HD-VHS VCRs, but not on the Mitsubishi HD-VHS VCR.
Sony introduced a $3,800 Hi-Def DVD recorder in Japan in April 2003 with a HD satellite tuner, but no Hi-Def DVD standalone recorder has been introduced in the US so far (Dec 2007) other than some prototypes shown at electronics shows.
The only Hi-Def DVD units introduced in the US were blue-laser players, not recorders, and they were introduced in early 2006 (HD DVD by Toshiba, and Blu-ray by Samsung a bit later).
If the archiving is not required in HD quality, perhaps it could be sufficient for now to record HD content down-converted as SD analog on a regular VCR or DVD recorder, but you would notice the difference when comparing the SD recording with the original HD content.
Analyze the Connectivity Issues
Most HDTV sets have analog component video inputs to connect HD-STBs and other devices, but such connection "might" be subjected to copy protection viewing restrictions if the content provider instructs the playing/tuning device to disallow the full HD delivery of the signal over that connection.
DVI, a digital connection for uncompressed HD video (no audio), was adopted to deter unlawful digital copying (by using HDCP, High-Definition-Content-Protection). Shortly after, HDMI was introduced to improve upon DVI, with a smaller connector and adding audio and control signal capabilities over the same single wire. HDMI also uses HDCP for content protection.
Complete coverage of the subject of HDMI is on the series of 10 articles I wrote entitled HDMI - A Digital Interface Solution.
Make sure the HDTV (integrated or monitor) has DVI or HDMI inputs to connect HD-STBs and DVD players (regular or Hi-Def) with those outputs, the more inputs the better.
Satellite HD tuners come only as separate HD-STBs, and they use DVI (or HDMI) and component outputs to connect to DTVs. Confirm that the DVI-HDMI connections on any equipment are HDCP compliant; some plasma panels with DVI inputs were designed to connect to PCs, and were not HDCP compliant.
Check that the HD-STB can simultaneously send out the HD and SD signals to the corresponding outputs, to view the HD image while a) recording the down-converted SD version on a regular VCR or b) distributing the SD version to other devices on a home-network of SD quality. Some HD-STBs cannot do this simultaneously.
Further coverage of the content protection and connectivity issues of HDTV can be read in the article I wrote titled Analysis of DTV Content Protection Rulings and Agreements.
HD Integrated Tuners
As mentioned at the beginning of this article, several years ago the FCC mandated an implementation plan for all manufacturers to gradually integrate HD tuners into digital TVs and digital recording devices. Likewise, a plug-and-play agreement with the cable industry was made (and approved by the FCC) to also include HD-cable tuners within TVs and HD-STBs with a POD (Point Of Deployment) card named "CableCARD".
The CableCARD was implemented with unidirectional capabilities only. Bi-directional cable features of VOD, Impulse PPV, and cable-supplied programming guide would still require the leasing of a separate cable HD-STB, duplicating the cable tuning cost for a consumer that has purchased a cable-ready DTV.
Since 70% of the U.S. population subscribes to cable, some people believe that integrated HDTVs with CableCARD tuners were practical and would accelerate DTV adoption. I believe that such acceleration comes with a high cost to consumers that do not need them, and they should have been offered a choice.
Cable-subscribers would be paying extra for an integrated TV that has an over-the-air tuner that would not actually be used, and vice versa. Neither person would have the choice to just pay for the tuner they need (or for no tuner at all) if integrated within all sets.
When the FCC issued the mandate in 2002, tuners were very high in cost ($400/$1000). Integrated TVs had an average extra MSRP of $704 above the price of equivalent monitor versions; that was the cost of having a digital tuner into a TV at that time.
Now certainly the cost is lower but there still an extra cost for most consumers that do not actually use the tuners if subscribed to satellite or bi-directional cable.
Details about the subject can be read on this article I wrote when the mandate was issued: HDTV Integrated Tuners and You.
Since the beginning of HDTV many early adopters have criticized the operational problems and reliability of HD tuners.
Having immature expensive tuners failing within a 300-pound HDTV set would require a costly in-home service when out of warranty. Having them within a separate STB facilitates their service, replacement, or flexible upgrade without having to open an HDTV, and cable subscribers would solve the problem by having the cable company switching the STB at no cost to the subscriber.
Even today, most satellite and cable HD-STBs are plagued with performance and operational problems that in many cases require periodic exchanges, and firmware upgrades are not sufficient to correct some design problems.
The theory of integration has merit, but careful consideration should have been given to the timing and the cost to consumers. The integration of components that are not mature enough and the price of tuners not yet reaching economies of scale, should have been both carefully analyzed before any mandate, and postpone until it makes more sense to consumers.
Controls, Cables, Screen Shields, ISF, Stores, etc
Most OTA HD reception is UHF, if you are to receive HDTV via terrestrial OTA, plan for having one antenna installed; even on the attic an antenna could receive good HDTV signals, and OTA is free.
Budget for good quality HD video wiring, especially if long runs are required for a DVI or HDMI cable at 1080p resolution and if it will be installed within walls or ceilings. Drywall repair would cost much more for a cable replacement caused by sub-par cabling performance problems or to upgrade to a higher HDMI cable category to been able to handle higher-level video equipment as you upgrade it.
Think about children around delicate screens lacking shield protection. Some sets have non-removable shields that reflect back room light that you might not notice at the store but you would object at your bright apartment at the beach.
Some plasma panels might reflect back to the viewer ambient light from bright rooms with uncovered windows. Some LCD panels that might be great for those lighted environments might offer inferior video quality and unacceptable motion blur to certain viewers.
Sometimes replacing a regular TV with an HDTV/home theater set-up becomes a nuisance for some family members due to the complexity of the system controls; in such case consider a simpler additional parallel wiring for just the HDTV/STB/DVD for stand-alone use, and budget for it.
TV manufacturers are still delivering HDTVs with their image settings at exaggerated levels to attract the attention of consumers when the sets are viewed under the fluorescent lighting of typical retail showrooms, but at home those image settings would be unacceptable. Once the set has been used for at least 200 hours, consider performing a calibration with one of the calibration Hi-Def DVDs (or regular DVD if you do not have a Hi-Def DVD player) to establish the correct TV settings for your particular environment.
Many videophiles prefer to perform an ISF (Imaging Science Foundation) calibration done by a trained technician using specialized calibration equipment. While most TVs improve after an ISF calibration, the cost of several hundred dollars depending on the number of inputs and resolutions you calibrate, could be relatively expensive for the price of your particular set, and your budget. Check your manufacturer's warranty about ISF, they might object the access and use of the TV's service menu by unauthorized service technicians and the warranty can be voided.
Additionally, it is not uncommon that after the set is ISF calibrated the untrained eye of a regular viewer feels that the image has lost its "pop" compared to before calibration, so the do-it-yourself calibration DVD alternative above might be a better start to keep cost down initially, and decide for ISF later.
Check for store policies regarding delivery, installation, extended warranties, and problem resolution policies, which are usually better coming from a reputable A/V store that could protect you when a heavy or expensive HDTV has problems, particularly in the case of the delivery and installation of delicate plasma panels.
Posted by Rodolfo La Maestra, February 13, 2008 9:35 AM
About Rodolfo La Maestra
Rodolfo La Maestra is the Senior Technical Director of UHDTV Magazine and HDTV Magazine and participated in the HDTV vision since the late 1980's. In the late 1990's, he began tracking and reviewing HDTV consumer equipment, and authored the annual HDTV Technology Review report, tutorials, and educative articles for HDTV Magazine, DVDetc and HDTVetc magazines, Veritas et Visus Newsletter, Display Search, and served as technical consultant/editor for the "Reference Guide" and the "HDTV Glossary of Terms" for HDTVetc and HDTV Magazines. In 2004, he began recording a weekly HDTV technology program for MD Cable television, which by 2006 reached the rating of second most viewed.
Rodolfo's background encompasses Electronic Engineering, Computer Science, and Audio and Video Electronics, with over 4,700 hours of professional training, a BS in Computer and Information Systems, and thirty+ professional and post-graduate certifications, some from MIT, American, and George Washington Universities. Rodolfo was also Computer Science professor in five institutions between 1966-1973 in Argentina, regarding IBM, Burroughs, and Honeywell mainframe computers. After 38 years of computer systems career, Rodolfo retired in 2003 as Chief of Systems Development from the Inter-American Development Bank directing sixty+ software-development computer professionals, supporting member countries in north/central/south America.