| HDTV Almanac - New Wireless HDTV Option | ||
|
By Alfred Poor HDTV Professor Posted on October 22, 2009 Category: General Interest |
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Del.icio.us
Save
Email
Print |
|
Receive instant notification of new columns:
Register Now to receive notification of new HDTV Magazine Columns via email as soon as they are published. You’ve got your beautiful, big, flat screen television hanging on the wall. Now how do you get the signal to it? You can buy an expensive HDMI cable to cover a long run, or you can spend a lot more to get a professional to run wires through your floor, wall, or ceiling. Now there’s a Door Number 3, thanks to Philips. The company has started shipping its Wireless HDTV Link that provides wireless HDMI links with support for up to 1080p transmissions.
The pair of devices — transmitter and receiver – list for $799, and are available now from Amazon and Dell (though it doesn’t appear to be on the Dell Web site yet), while Sam’s Club and Costco will start carrying it in November. The transmitter has two HDMI connections and two component video connections. While I’d like to see another HDMI connection or two, this is a reasonable configuration.
I like the idea of this class of product for a variety of reasons, the least of which is that it means that you only need an AC outlet for your TV. Even that will disappear if you can put the outlet behind the television. The wireless connection will take care of the messy wires. The main reason I like it, however, is that it lets you get away from the traditional concept of piling all the components around the base of the television set. It makes far more sense to put them on the other side of the room, where you’re seated, so that you have easy access to disc players and switches and settings.
One problem I see with this arrangement is that it does not provide a network connection for NeTVs (which is a term that friend and colleague Peter Putman coined recently for network-capable televisions, and that I like the term a lot), but a fast 802.11n WiFi connection should take care of that. So I exhort all TVs to go wireless; you have nothing to lose but your cables!
Sphere: Related ContentPosted by Alfred Poor, October 22, 2009 6:00 AM
Reader Commentary Oct 22, 9:32am Too pricey at $799 or at Amazon's ~$118 discount--this should be offered at around $200 Oct 22, 10:33am So they should sell it at a loss? That technology can't be cheap. Oct 22, 10:58am neither is HDTV technology and $799 buys a reasonable flat screen--- I doubt they will sell many at that price Oct 22, 11:25am I agree that the average user may not buy this product, but the one that uses a custom installer might. It would save a lot of money. And I expect that the installers themselves will be buying them; they can install one of these a lot cheaper than they ca Oct 23, 5:58am I like the idea.. but have a few questions: (a) will it be upgradable to the newer HDMI 1.4 that is reported to have network transmission as part of the cable spec's? (b) can a single transmitter feed multi receivers/TV's/Rooms? (c) since as I read it Oct 23, 7:08am I can't find definitive answers on the Philips sites, but here are my best guesses. I don't expect that this will have an upgrade path to HDMI 1.4, and the network connection in particular. That's an increase in bandwidth that may not be available in the Oct 23, 11:34pm With the cost of televisions including 40 plus inch and powerful quad core computers with wireless networking capability for less than this, I'd figure $100 on each end would still let them make a profit. That is if they are true wireless and not the typ More on General Interest
More from Alfred Poor
About Alfred PoorAlfred Poor is a well-known display industry expert, who writes the daily HDTV Almanac. He wrote for PC Magazine for more than 20 years, and now is focusing on the home entertainment and home networking markets. |
About ColumnsHDTV Magazine Columns are written by various personalities within the HDTV industry. They are typically shorter than our standard Article and quite often express the opinion of the author(s). And of course, opinions expressed by these authors are not necessarily those of HDTV Magazine.Other Recent Discussion
Authors
Categories
|