HDTV Magazine
Welcome, Anonymous  •  Sign In  •  Register  •  Help
Receive instant notification of new columns: Register Now to receive notification of new HDTV Magazine Columns via email as soon as they are published.
HDTV Almanac - 3DTV: It Starts with Sports
by Alfred Poor on March 19, 2010 Categories: 3D HDTV, Programming

With some consumers willing to spend hundreds of dollars per seat to attend some sporting events, it should come as little surprise that live 3DTV programming is going to begin with sports coverage. The press is still writing pages about the first 3D-capable sets from Samsung, Sony, and Panasonic — many of which have not shipped yet — and already we’re hearing about efforts to broadcast 3D programming.

For example, Comcast will provide free 3D coverage of the Masters golf tournament. The cable company plans to show two hours on each of the first five days.

CBS has announced 3D coverage of the late rounds of the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament. While this won’t be broadcast to TVs, it will be shown in about 100 movie theaters across the nation.

Both of these initiatives are important. They have an aura of exclusivity that may lead some sports fans to think that they’re missing something by not having 3D. So this could help increase the early “pull” demand on the part of consumers for 3D-capable sets. In addition, this will let the producers of sporting event programming start to climb the learning curve for real-time live 3D coverage of sports. Just as in the early days of HDTV, the new format requires new hardware and all the production facilities required to process and deliver the content. These are not trivial challenges, but as we’ve seen with HD, once they are ironed out we can expect to see the use of 3D stereoscopic imaging spread rapidly through other types of content, right down to the local TV newsroom.

Posted by Alfred Poor, March 19, 2010 6:00 AM

Reader Commentary

Reply
mhodges • Mar 19, 11:22am
I just don't get the attraction. 3DTV (and 3D movies for that matter) doesn't add anything compelling for me. It adds nothing that I personally consider "value added" like HDTV was when I first saw it.

For me, "3D" is not closer to "real life" or like "being there". Its a distraction from the viewing experience because of numerous factors (the glasses, the eyestrain, the color loss, the continued use of visual "gimmicks" even in serious movies like Avatar).

I have no intention of sitting in my living room with glasses on to watch TV. I had LASIK to avoid that!

Someone convince me what 3D brings to the table I'm missing that makes it a "killer app" like HD.

I can only hope that I'm not forced to it because broadcasts come in 3D and isn't watchable otherwise....
Reply
wessokolosky • Mar 20, 8:59am
FWIW I agree. 3D needs to contribute to the narrative if it is to be worthwhile. I believe it did that to some degree in Avatar, and will in the IMAX Hubble film. However, for the vast majority of films/TV shows, it seems to me it will be more of a distraction from the narrative. In contrast, adding sound to film way back in 1927 was obviously a serious game changer. Within about 3 years, silent films were no longer produced. Today's iteration of 3D, while unquestionably better than the early attempts in the 50s, will not, in my opinion follow that trajectory. It simply doesn't add that much to the story, at least for me.

Wes Sokolosky...

About Alfred Poor

Alfred Poor is a well-known display industry expert, who writes the daily HDTV Almanac. He wrote for PC Magazine for more than 20 years, and now is focusing on the home entertainment and home networking markets.