|
|
The Internet is buzzing with the news about Apple’s iTV. At the very least, this is a refreshing change from it buzzing with rumors about iTV. We all know that Steve Jobs is the master marketer of our time; he can turn a sow’s ear into a silk purse just by talking about it. The facts don’t always support the assertions, however. (See my analysis of the claim that the iPad is “the best… movie-watching experience ever.”) So here comes the new iTV. It’s a little box – much like a Roku or other boxes — that connects your TV to the Internet through your local network and a broadband connection. And it lets you stream content from the Web. And you can now get that content from iTunes. We know iTunes; that’s the service that made it safe and simple enough that millions of people would actually pay for the music that they download. But one difference here is that you only rent the video content from iTunes. TV shows cost $.99 each, and movies cost $2.99 for older standard definition titles to $4.99 for new HD releases. Once you rent a show or movie, you have 30 days to start watching, but then you have to finish within the next 24 hours (48 hours for a TV show). Huh? Oh, and the TV shows are only from ABC (where Jobs sits on the Board of Directors) and Fox. This makes the selection available on Hulu seem like a feast. But what about Hulu? Well, at least with iTV you don’t have to watch commercials, which is an advantage that it shares with the Netflix streaming service. Netflix doesn’t (yet) give you access to many recent releases, but the shows don’t expire once you start watching them. And all you need is an $8.95 monthly subscription. Rent two shows a night from iTunes for one work week and you will have spent more than you would for the Netflix subscription that would last the whole month. But here’s the really crazy part; Apple is including Netflix streaming on the iTV. And YouTube access. I guess the idea is that people may watch a lot of the free and flat-rate stuff, but come to iTunes for the latest releases that they can’t get from the other services. The $99 price for the iTV box makes sense, or at least a whole lot more sense than the price of the original Apple TV that it replaces. But I don’t see the appeal of the rental model for the content. I think that a lot of the viewing public will prefer the all-you-can-eat terms of Hulu (with the commercials) or Netflix (with the low monthly subscription) over the Apple offering. Aside from the loyal Apple fans, I’m not sure who is going to buy this. I can’t see it becoming the same sort of hit that the iPod or iPhone were when they were released. Posted by Alfred Poor, September 3, 2010 6:00 AM Reader Commentaryjvrichards • Sep 3, 8:36am My disappointment with the Roku box has been 1) Netflix does not provide current movies for streaming. 2) Netflix does not provide surround sound. 3) The movies look good but they don't look as good as a Blu Ray disc. I can't see that Apple TV overcomes any of these shortcomings.... alfredpoor • Sep 3, 8:42am (3) I have not seen the high-definition Roku box, so I can't comment on how it compares with a standard DVD or with a Blu-ray disc. And I haven't seen the Apple product yet, but it clearly offers high definition movies from the iTunes store. (Whether or not an 802.11g connection is fast enough to stream that content without excessive compression is a different issue entirely, and I'll need firsthand experience before I can pass judgment on that.) (1) As for the current movies, iTV is supposedly going to get day and date release of movies as they come out on DVD, so it will be much more current than the existing Netflix offerings. On the other hand, I can't imagine that Netflix is going to have to wait much longer to get access to more new releases for their streaming service. Alfred... alice • Sep 3, 3:36pm I do not get it either . The HD content from what i gather is 720p and seems more suited to music streaming... ccclvib • Sep 12, 11:41am
Back to what excites you, I guess. Don't forget: most TV viewers, whether they have an HD TV or not, don't know 720 from 1080 from 480. They might, if pressed, begin to notice the granularity of 480 over 1080, but it won't make a difference. Steve Jobs knows this! ...and as far as he - and Apple - are concerned they'll be happy to sell you as low a quality anything (MP3 vs .wav, for instance) as you'll take. I too often forget just how much in the minority those of who (obsess?) over video and audio quality appear to be. I'm reminded often by my neighbors and the folks who work with my wife. Just give them a picture they can see and sound that isn't so muddled they can't understand it, and they're just fine. I guess being a professional musician once-up-a-time was a bad thing. I never used to think so.... More from Alfred Poor
More in Category: Cable HDTV
About Alfred PoorAlfred Poor is a well-known display industry expert, who writes the daily HDTV Almanac. He wrote for PC Magazine for more than 20 years, and now is focusing on the home entertainment and home networking markets. |
advertisement
Authors
Categories
Other Recent Discussion
advertisement
|
||||||||