|
|
In a press release, The Diffusion Group (TDG) announced its new report, “The Possibilities and Challenges for Mobile TV”. In the release, TDG states that mobile TV subscription services are forecast to double their subscriber base by 2013. This sounds exciting until you find out that this means increasing from 1.6 million this year to 3.3 million subscribers in 2013. That number pales in comparison to other services; for example, Comcast is estimated to have 23.5 million cable TV subscribers. The press release indicates that demand for the service is lower than originally expected, partly because it is an additional fee on top of other subscription services. Also, few mobile phones are equipped to receive the over-the-air Mobile TV signals. I agree that the cost may be part of the problem, but the real barrier to growth for these offerings is that users have good alternatives already. Most of the people who would be willing to pay for a mobile TV service already have smart phones with data plans. And this allows them to access streaming content from the Internet at no additional fee beyond their existing data plan. (And if they’re paying for the data plan, they may as well use it.) TDG suggests that the solution may be to bundle Mobile TV service in with other subscription TV services such as cable or satellite. This doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. Cable and satellite are already struggling to stop the bleeding of lost customers, and are working feverishly to make their own content available to subscribers over the Internet, through TV Everywhere initiatives. Mobile TV is a cool idea that would have been a lot cooler 15 years ago. Unfortunately, in today’s crowded market of free, pay-as-you-go, and subscribtion services on the Internet, there really is not room — or need – for another entertainment distribution system. Posted by Alfred Poor, September 2, 2010 6:00 AM Reader Commentaryccclvib • Sep 3, 12:11am I am reminded of the satellite telephone service, of which I had intimate experience. The cost and time involved with sending in excess of fifty satellites into orbit, moving them around and then providing all the equipment in multiple locations around the world with which to create the network - then sell some very expensive cell phones - was immense. The fact it came right on top of the explosion of regular cell phone use, which eliminated more than half the prospective buyers, meant satellite telephone service was relegated almost immediately to a niche market. An extremely expensive (due to the low number of users) niche market. They have proven their worth in many disaster situations (Hurricane Katrina for one), when all other forms of vocal communication have been knocked out, but as a large scale competitor to other vocal communication, it just didn't happen. A whole lot of companies lost a lot of money on what was, when it was originally formulated, a really good idea. Ju... alfredpoor • Sep 3, 6:14am
I think you have it about right. Flexible beats dedicated just about every time. Alfred... More from Alfred Poor
More in Category: Mobile HDTV
About Alfred PoorAlfred Poor is a well-known display industry expert, who writes the daily HDTV Almanac. He wrote for PC Magazine for more than 20 years, and now is focusing on the home entertainment and home networking markets. |
advertisement
Authors
Categories
Other Recent Discussion
advertisement
|
||||||||