HDTV Magazine
Welcome, Anonymous  •  Sign In  •  Register  •  Help
Receive instant notification of new columns: Register Now to receive notification of new HDTV Magazine Columns via email as soon as they are published.
HDTV Almanac - NetFlix Posts Good News
by Alfred Poor on January 27, 2012 Categories: Internet HD Video

In a letter to shareholders about 4th Quarter 2011 results, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings reported good news and bad news. As I read the letter, it looks to me that while the company may have made some very public missteps along the way, there is no question in my mind that the corporate change of direction was a good choice and that it is already paying dividends.

The big news for many people is that the online streaming subscribers now outnumber the DVD-in-the-mail subscribers almost two t0 one. Netflix ended the year with nearly 22 million streaming subscribers and a little more than 11 million DVD subscribers. The DVD users still produce the bulk of the profits, however, $194 million for the quarter compared with just $52 million for the streaming. Still, the company had hoped that streaming would account for as much as 8% of the company profits by the end of last year; it turns out that they exceeded that goal with almost 11% of profits coming from streaming.

Netflix has turned the corner and is not looking back. They see that the days are numbered for DVD rentals; “As expected, DVD members declined this quarter to 11.2 million due to the continued impact of the price changes, as hybrid members continued to predominantly choose a streaming-only plan over a higher priced hybrid plan.” The consumers are voting with their dollars, and moving from disc to broadband delivery. One interesting point is that they see the existing television subscription services as their main competition going forward. “Just as broadcast networks have substantially transformed themselves into cable channels over the last twenty years, both broadcast and cable networks will effectively also become Internet networks like Netflix. As a pure-play we have many advantages, however, just as cable did over broadcast.” Netflix clearly has a strong head start over the others in streaming video, and their commitment to expanding their catalog of content is evidence of their will to compete. They lost the Starz content, but they have already contracted with studios to license many of the same titles directly. And they’re even launching their own original production of content, including a resurrection of the popular series “Arrested Development.”

The company’s future success is anything but guaranteed, but it clearly remains a force to be reckoned with in the market. The transition from in-the-mail to Internet has not been without its bumps, for certain, but Netflix looks strong and will play a role in shaping the future of television.

Posted by Alfred Poor, January 27, 2012 5:00 AM

Reader Commentary

Reply
Rodolfo • Jan 27, 3:07pm
Delivering streaming content over broadband is subjected to the price consumers pay for the separate Internet service, which is out of Netflix control, and certainly could affect its streaming business once all services settle their requirements and caps, for example due to Net Neutrality, which can also bring changes in pricing and monthly caps as companies react to new policies.

Such combination of charges could potentially make streaming economically illogical for a subscriber regardless how convenient maybe. More illogical (to Netflix and indirectly the subscriber) than absorbing occasional increases of a few cents more for the postage of a mailed disc from time to time, which I would say is easier to calculate and plan for future budgeting than the Internet mess. Although mailing cost is also out of control of Netflix they have historical data for proyections and years of experience doing it, as opposed to Internet charges that could end up anywhere and make the whole service r...
Reply
videograbber • Jan 27, 7:30pm
Rodolfo,

those are all really good points, and I was happy to see you making them. To prosper, Netflix needs to be adaptable enough that they can change to meet the needs of a dynamic marketplace. And not try to put all their eggs into a basket which, as you say, may at some point become too heavy to carry. Their expectations that the streaming side will continue to grow, and overshadow their hard-media rentals may not actually come to pass. Bandwidth still isn't free.

For myself, I don't have much interest in the convenience of streaming, simply because I value the quality of blu-ray too highly. If I'm going to take the time in my busy day to sit down and spend 2 hours to watch a movie, I want to see it in the highest quality possible. I spent too much time and money on display technology and ancillary hardware, to enable a best quality user experience. With multiple avenues for blu-ray rentals of new releases available (local shops, Redbox, and Netflix), combined with very r...
Reply
Rodolfo • Jan 27, 8:44pm
Videograbber,

I agree 100% with your approach; that is exactly what I am doing and for the same reason.

Throughout the years I have spent about $100,000 in hardware and software for my HT in pursue of the ultimate video and audio quality, and the 2 hours I spend transporting myself into a good movie would be a total waste of time and HT investment if just clicking to stream a Netflix substandard movie. It is substandard even when it could eventually be 1080i/p, compared to the current ultimate Blu-ray standard, and 4K Blu-ray is around the corner as pre-recorded media of content that is already filmed and stored as 4K.

Reason by which I am installing a Sony's 4K projector to take my HT to a higher level of image quality needed by a Cinemascope screen, and it would be more criminal to spend even an hour of this beauty projecting streamed content and upscaling 4 times the compression artifacts it brings, even when my Internet connection is 100Mbps.

But I admit that, sometimes, wha...
Reply
wessokolosky • Feb 3, 10:09am
I opted for the physical disc for the reasons noted above, but also because of the supplementary materials on the disc that do not come with the streaming versions. Sometimes these supplements are fascinating, and lead to a deeper understanding/appreciation of the principal material. I had Netflix streaming for quite sometime, and could live with less than best quality video. However, I often found myself requesting the disc as well just for the supplements. It seems unlikely that these will ever be included with the streamed versions.

Keep up the good work guys.

Wes...
Reply
alesch111 • Feb 4, 1:19pm
I opted for the physical disc for the reasons noted above, but also because of the supplementary materials on the disc that do not come with the streaming versions. Sometimes these supplements are fascinating, and lead to a deeper understanding/appreciation of the principal material. I had Netflix streaming for quite sometime, and could live with less than best quality video. However, I often found myself requesting the disc as well just for the supplements. It seems unlikely that these will ever be included with the streamed versions.

Keep up the good work guys.

Wes
Many of the discs I get from in the mail from Netflix are a "rental" version and do not have the extra features....
Reply
wessokolosky • Feb 4, 1:30pm

Many of the discs I get from in the mail from Netflix are a "rental" version and do not have the extra features.


Curious! While not all of the Netflix discs I receive have supplemental materials, a fair number do. Don't really know what to make of that, though my original stated preference for having the supplementary materials when available stands, and led me to drop streaming in favor of physical discs.

Wes...
Reply
alfredpoor • Feb 5, 8:33am
I think Netflix rarely sends out the second disc of a two disc set, which is one of the reasons that you don't get the supplementary content for some films.

Alfred
HDTV Almanac...

More from Alfred Poor

» - Currently Reading

About Alfred Poor

Alfred Poor is a well-known display industry expert, who writes the daily HDTV Almanac. He wrote for PC Magazine for more than 20 years, and now is focusing on the home entertainment and home networking markets.