HDTV Magazine
Welcome, Guest  •  Sign In  •  Register  •  Help
Receive instant notification of HDTV Bulletins: Register Now to receive notification of HDTV Bulletins via email as soon as they are published.
Magid Study Finds Lingering Misperceptions in Countdown to Digital
by Shane Sturgeon on November 10, 2008 Category: Digital (DTV) Transition

Somehow I missed this story when it came out on Friday. Hopefully you still find it relevant following the weekend.

- Shane


Magid Study Finds Lingering Misperceptions in Countdown to Digital

NEW YORK, Nov. 7 /PRNewswire/ -- With only 100 days remaining before broadcasters shut down their analog television transmissions, new research from Frank N. Magid Associates finds that an unprecedented 96 percent of all consumers ages 21 and older now say they have heard something about the pending digital transition.

That increased awareness, however, does not mean everyone has taken the steps necessary to be prepared for the dawn of a new era in television.

Magid's online survey, fielded in September, reveals that 59 percent of all consumers say they have what they need to receive local broadcast television signals on February 17, 2009. This proportion drops to 40 percent among households at greatest risk -- those who rely solely on over-the-air signals for their TV programming.

In many cases, this lack of preparedness has to do with the fact that these households simply haven't yet done what they know they need to do to get ready. Half of the over-the-air-only households say they have applied for the digital receiver coupons offered by the government. However, it's not clear whether they have received their coupons, purchased the receiver or connected it to their analog TV sets.

"It will be important for any further communication from the government -- or from cable operators, satellite companies and broadcasters -- to focus on taking those last steps to readiness," said Maryann Baldwin, Vice President, Magid Media Futures(TM) and the architect of the study. She notes that a fourth of those consumers with over-the-air-only TV sets say they remain likely to purchase a TV set with an integrated digital tuner, bypassing the need for an external device.

As the digital transition draws near, one misperception has actually become somewhat stronger. Three in ten (29%) consumers now believe that all television programming will be presented in high definition after the digital transition takes place. This errant expectation exists among cable and satellite subscribers as well as those who receive their TV signals over the air. In reality, while digital broadcasting makes over-the-air transmission of high-definition programming possible, many cable networks and broadcast day parts are not yet available in HD, and many programs are still not produced in HD.

"Many of those consumers who have purchased HDTV sets and made arrangements for HD programming will likely be disappointed on February 17," said Jill Rosengard Hill, Senior Vice President, Frank N. Magid Associates. "While these households will indeed continue to receive local broadcast signals via their cable, satellite or digital receivers, a significant amount of programming will still come to them in traditional standard definition."

The online survey includes 1,238 adults who are 21 years or older and is nationally representative in gender, age, race and geography. It was fielded September 14-26, 2008.

About Frank N. Magid Associates

Founded in 1957, Frank N. Magid Associates provides research-driven, strategic media counsel on the evolving consumer mindset for clients in 37 countries. The company helps businesses that are struggling to make sense of a constantly evolving marketplace connect with an increasingly elusive, splintered consumer who is seemingly hidden behind an expansive array of technologies. Magid not only provides businesses with an understanding of the attitudes, opinions and actions of today's technology-saturated consumers, but also offers research-driven strategic advice on how to successfully brand, advertise, market and design their products and services. For more information, please visit Magid on the Web at www.magid.com.

Source: Frank N. Magid Associates

Posted by Shane Sturgeon, November 10, 2008 1:00 PM

Reader Commentary

Reply
eliwhitney • Nov 10, 1:23pm
Hi Shane & others -


Our local PBS station held an "open workshop" free to all { stuffed, too !} ..... although many were informed like this recent survey regarding a high % aware of "switch" .... there are or seem to be a huge number totally unaware of being unable to simply "connect" their federal coupon Converter between the "V" Rabbit Ears & the TV ! They popular comment is ... that's what the TV commercial said!

IF very old at all, these set tops have long-since LOST the loop or bow tie portion for the mandatory UHF Band needed, excepting NYC, Chicago + a few others.

And, "rabbit ears" - even with those old UHF elements - don't provide enough "gain" in many instances, either.

An unpleasant Feb is possible !

eli...
Reply
tnsprin • Nov 11, 12:32pm
I suspect those who are ready for the conversion are actually already watching the digital channels rather than the analog ones.

However I have noticed a few disturbing trends in addition

At least one major cable company is advertising that for those who still have an antenna, they should call them an convert to digital by subscirbing to their cable system.

Although a few of the conversion boxes are sold at $40(the coupon value), most are sold for more.

A number of stations are now are will be going to digital frequencies in the VHF range, but many people were misinformed that they only need a UHF antenna.

Not sure what day they will do it, but for those channels currently using a temporary Digital frequency and will switch to a permanent one. When they switch to there permanent one (for example several in NY are going back to there old VHF frequencies), many people will again be confused. Most of the Tuners will have to rescan to pickup the channel....
Reply
eliwhitney • Nov 11, 1:11pm
Hello tnsprin

Your concerns are often "asked " by many others - but - a point or two, please -

* Those public Infomercials all have the telephone number and / or the web site listed for more information.

* The final Channel assignments have been done / made available for Quite some time now ... surely, "IF " one was at all informed / involved, they would have reconfirmed as to the Post Feb < VHF / UHF Band or Combo> prior to buying a new antenna unit for their address / ZIP.

* Everyone should rescan on the morning After the Analog elimination, be it a TV & it's federal coupon Converter or a new HDTV, with it's internal ATSC .

* IF unable to safely self-install a required Roof Top antenna system, then, perhaps a cable may well be not a totally-bad alternative ... antenna installations commercially can easily run several hundred dollars ... that pays for many months of very basic service !

* When strictly UHF Band, there will be "fringe" areas wherein No antenna r...
Reply
Roger Halstead • Nov 12, 4:21pm
Although I agree with almost everything you said, it is not true that digital signals are either perfect of gone. The range of signal strength where they are marginal is much narrower than analog, but it exists. In that range you will see pixelation, temporary freezing, and even the audio going out of sync with the image. Rather than a weak, snowy image it acts like a poor connection.

OTOH where an analog signal is weak and snowy and not worth watching the digital will be sharp and solid.

I see almost no difference in my ability to pick up UHF stations at the longer distances than I do VHF. Many of our stations around here are operating both VHF and UHF and will continue to do so after the switch.

For those with outdoor antennas that get their present stations those same antennas should work well with digital IF the digital station is not at a different location. Years ago I put up a large Winegard UHF dish with remote preamp, on the side of a tower so I could watch th...
Reply
akirby • Nov 13, 6:37am

I see almost no difference in my ability to pick up UHF stations at the longer distances than I do VHF.

That's because you have an antenna that picks up both UHF and VHF. Some people only have one or the other and for them it could be a problem.

Many of our stations around here are operating both VHF and UHF and will continue to do so after the switch.

That is totally false. Stations will only be allowed to broadcast on 1 channel after February. Those final channels have already been assigned and in some cases it's a totally different channel the 2 they're currently using....
Reply
Roger Halstead • Nov 13, 3:54pm

I see almost no difference in my ability to pick up UHF stations at the longer distances than I do VHF.

That's because you have an antenna that picks up both UHF and VHF. Some people only have one or the other and for them it could be a problem.

No, I only have a single, but large UHF antenna that points South. I'll soon have another that points NW. The VHF stations are mostly within 45-50 miles, but I still get 6 out of Lansing (snowy on analog, but crystal clear on digital). This is what makes the TV antenna selector site almost useless as half, or more of the stations I watch are outside what they consider usable
distances. OTOH as I said in the earlier post, I seldom watch the networks and their watered down programming and reality shows.


Many of our stations around here are operating both VHF and UHF and will c...
Reply
akirby • Nov 13, 9:02pm
I get it now - that was a little confusing. Here is the document with final channel assignments.

In some cases they're sticking with their original NTSC channel, some stay on their current ATSC channel and some go to a totally different channel.

http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.pdf...
Reply
Roger Halstead • Nov 14, 12:16am
Thanks for the link to the list. It apparently isn't complete or completely accurate with some typos. Which? I don't know.

A while back they had most of the stations in our area listed as staying on the current primary channel. The list now shows only 4 of the 21 I can receive with the assignment unchanged. Some are swapping assignments. Bay City is leaving 5 for 22, but Kalamazoo is leaving 52 for 5 and there are a number of others. There are some mistakes in it as well. Currently Ch 19 is near Bay City or Saginaw, but the only 19 listed is in Marquette which is in the Upper Peninsula. Nor are the call letters listed.

Some of the changes are already in effect. IOW if you punch in the new channel number it will take you to the current channel assignment. With others there is nothing on the new assignment... yet. The major players are running 1080i, but most are 720p Some PBS are running 4 channels on the one assignment which means SD and that changes according to the time of ...
Reply
akirby • Nov 14, 7:05am
ABC and Fox are 720p - everyone else is 1080i as far as broadcast TV. That's decided by the network. ESPN channels are also 720p....

About Shane Sturgeon

Shane Sturgeon is the Co-Publisher and Chief Technologist of HDTV Magazine, an industry publication with HDTV roots going back to 1984, when Dale Cripps founded The HDTV Newsletter. Today, HDTV Magazine is a leading online resource for HDTV news and information and captures the eyes and imaginations of over 3 million visitors annually. Mr. Sturgeon has a background in information technology and has served in various consulting capacities for Fortune 500 companies such as J.P. Morgan Chase, Verizon Communications, Proctor & Gamble and Nationwide Insurance. He has a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Wright State University.