HDTV Magazine
Welcome, Anonymous  •  Sign In  •  Register  •  Help
Receive instant notification of HDTV Bulletins: Register Now to receive notification of HDTV Bulletins via email as soon as they are published.
CableLabs® Develops 3D Test Support, Opens Laboratory for 3D TV Technology
by Shane Sturgeon on January 5, 2010 Categories: 3D HDTV, Cable, Satellite & Fiber

CableLabs® Develops 3D Test Support, Opens Laboratory for 3D TV Technology

LOUISVILLE, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--CableLabs® has expanded support for development of 3D television technology. This effort results from the positive responses of the consumer electronics and programming industries.

CableLabs is providing testing capabilities for 3D TV implementation scenarios over cable. These capabilities cover a full range of technologies including various frame compatible, spatial multiplexing solutions for transmission. Examples of the systems were shown publicly at a CableLabs-organized 3D TV Pavilion demonstration held in Denver as part of the Society of Cable & Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) Cable-Tec Expo in October.

Based upon an RFI issued by CableLabs in March 2009, CableLabs opened its test facilities for development and support to vendors and TV designers to explore interoperability with 3D cable delivery systems.

As a result of these investigations, CableLabs has determined that many of the digital set-top boxes deployed by cable operators are capable of processing 3D TV signals in frame-compatible formats. Today’s new generation of 3D TV receivers is expected to support these formats using an HDMI video connection. It was through this testing that CableLabs played an influential role in the recently announced changes to the HDMI 3D specifications to add support for the "Top/Bottom" format and enable legacy STBs to signal 3D carriage.

A "frame-compatible" 3D format is one that carries separate left and right video signals within the video frame used to convey a conventional (2D) high-definition signal by squeezing them to fit within the space of one picture. The advantage of such a format is that it can be delivered through existing plant and equipment as if it were a 2D HDTV signal.

While the frame-compatible formats will enable support for stereoscopic 3D signaling almost immediately, work continues on an effort to define a long-term solution that will enable support for 3D content that can be delivered at resolutions and frame rates as high as 1080p60 for both eyes.

“We’ve found today’s cable system is a flexible system that enables delivery of 3D TV signals with little to no change in cable’s existing video on demand and switched digital video infrastructure to existing set-top boxes,” said CableLabs President and CEO Dr. Paul Liao. “This system will deliver a high-definition 3D image to today’s new generation of 3D TVs regardless of their native display technology,” he added.

“As with 3D cinema, the viewing of 3D TV in the home will require special glasses. Cable delivered 3D video works equally well with displays using active shutter glasses and with displays using passive polarized glasses,” said David Broberg, Vice President of Consumer Video Technology at CableLabs.

Cable’s VOD and SDV systems can deliver the 3DTV signals to those subscribers who have upgraded to new 3DTVs, while simultaneously delivering a 2D variation of the program to existing subscribers with only a small fractional increase in bandwidth needed.

The importance of cable delivery of 3D video was underscored in a recent Quixel Research survey of consumers who own HDTVs. The survey found 46% of respondents had a strong interest in viewing 3D TV in their homes over a cable or satellite distribution system versus other distribution means such as Blu-ray. A summary of the research is available at the following Web site: http://www.quixelresearch.com/pdfs/Quixel_3D_Study_2009_Overview_ZZZ.pdf.

Working with content owners, cable equipment manufacturers, consumer electronics companies and 3D technology companies, CableLabs actively supports work in standards bodies such as SCTE, Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) and the Society of Motion Picture and Television Executives (SMPTE) to standardize technologies that enable distribution of 3D TV content over cable systems.

Founded in 1988 by members of the cable television industry, Cable Television Laboratories is a non-profit research and development consortium that is dedicated to pursuing new cable telecommunications technologies and to helping its cable operator members integrate those advancements into their business objectives. Cable operators from around the world are members. CableLabs maintains Web sites at www.cablelabs.com; www.opencable.com, www.tru2way.com, www.advancedadvertising.tv, www.packetcable.com; www.cablemodem.com; and www.cablenet.org.

CableCARD™, CableHome®, CableLabs®, CableNET®, CablePC™, DCAS™, DOCSIS®, Go2BroadbandSM, M-Card™, OpenCable™, OCAP™, PacketCable™, and tru2way® are marks of Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.

Posted by Shane Sturgeon, January 5, 2010 10:14 AM

Reader Commentary

Reply
hharris4earthlink • Jan 6, 4:50am
I would really appreciate an analysis of what this announcement is talking about because it has me totally confused.

"A "frame-compatible" 3D format is one that carries separate left and right video signals within the video frame used to convey a conventional (2D) high-definition signal by squeezing them to fit within the space of one picture. The advantage of such a format is that it can be delivered through existing plant and equipment as if it were a 2D HDTV signal."

Yes, but that means, if I understand this correctly, that in this format, 3D will have half the resolution of my current HD TV. Speaking for myself, the added dimension of 3D isn't worth sacrificing resolution and polarized 3D was never very popular in the theater so I don't see why it would be popular at home.

The other question I have to ask is WHY? There seems to be some muddled thinking here. Jumping on the 3D bandwagon only makes sense if the TV experience emulates the QUALITY of theater 3D. It's quality t...
Reply
Richard • Jan 6, 9:59am
We are trying to get my 3D article out...

Yes, broadcast 3D will take a hit in performance. Will you notice? If you do how bad is it? Unknown...

Blu-ray will be providing the 3D full meal deal you want.

There will be different 3D display technologies but only one 3D standard.

Gotta have a 120hz display (3D ready) to support the 3D full meal deal at 60 frames....
Reply
hharris4earthlink • Jan 6, 1:26pm
Thanks! In your analysis could you address the question of why not just adding a 3D synch signal to the existing standard wouldn't solve the problem simply with the least impact on the consumer? This way you'd just buy a box that would read the synch signal and use it to switch active shutter glasses. I think I've seen something like this for the PS3, but I've not seen enough hard technical info to be sure....
Reply
Richard • Jan 7, 1:23pm
You and I went over all that already...
http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/viewt ... ght=#39816

BTW, forgot to add that while DTV has no option but to take a hit in 3D performance that is not the case with satellite and cable services... especially satellite since they already use MPEG4 and support 1080p......

About Shane Sturgeon

Shane Sturgeon is the Co-Publisher and Chief Technologist of HDTV Magazine, an industry publication with HDTV roots going back to 1984, when Dale Cripps founded The HDTV Newsletter. Today, HDTV Magazine is a leading online resource for HDTV news and information and captures the eyes and imaginations of over 3 million visitors annually. Mr. Sturgeon has a background in information technology and has served in various consulting capacities for Fortune 500 companies such as J.P. Morgan Chase, Verizon Communications, Proctor & Gamble and Nationwide Insurance. He has a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Wright State University.