Another point for Blu-ray

Started by Aug 11, 2005 17 posts
Read-only archive
#1
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html

Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
talking about in 3-4 months!

Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
seeing you all on HD.net :)

Jason Burroughs

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#2
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Those 80 titles supposed to have been released with the HD-DVD player sure
got reduced. It looks like about a dozen titles now and that will not fly,
at least not with me. Hollywood loves "copy protection", and it appears
that for the moment Blu-Ray is leading in that area of the technology so we
may actually wind up with the best.

Hugh


----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:22 AM
Subject: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html

Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
talking about in 3-4 months!

Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
seeing you all on HD.net :)

Jason Burroughs

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#3
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Also as previously mentioned, Blu-Ray is supposed to have much greater audio
potential (resolution)!!

Larry


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Hugh Campbell
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:44 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Those 80 titles supposed to have been released with the HD-DVD player sure
got reduced. It looks like about a dozen titles now and that will not fly,
at least not with me. Hollywood loves "copy protection", and it appears
that for the moment Blu-Ray is leading in that area of the technology so we
may actually wind up with the best.

Hugh


----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:22 AM
Subject: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html

Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
talking about in 3-4 months!

Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
seeing you all on HD.net :)

Jason Burroughs

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#4
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

So how does the "watermark" and "dynamic encryption" work in conjunction
with HDCP or are they separate entities doing different things?

Anthony R.
Orlando, FL

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html

Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
talking about in 3-4 months!

Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
seeing you all on HD.net :)

Jason Burroughs

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#5
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Watermark and dynamic encryption are at the software layer - in other
words, independent of the physical connection. The data is store in
certain ways to ensure it isn't easily copied from disc to disc using a
computer, etc.

HDCP is at a different layer and implemented between devices that
support it. They are 'software agnostic' and will encrypt whatever is
put through them.

These layers are not interdependent but can be used together. In other
words, you could have a blu-ray system with dynamic encryption and no
HDCP connection, a system without encryption (like some DVDs) with HDCP,
or both.

Does that help?

Jason Burroughs


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
Of Anthony Rizzuto
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:30 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

So how does the "watermark" and "dynamic encryption" work in conjunction
with HDCP or are they separate entities doing different things?

Anthony R.
Orlando, FL

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html

Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
talking about in 3-4 months!

Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
seeing you all on HD.net :)

Jason Burroughs

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same day) send an email to:
[email protected]

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#6
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Yes it does. If all of the new software manufactured to Blu-Ray's standards
will have both the "watermark" and dynamic encryption, and further if the
studios are confident enough in these processes to jump from one camp to the
other, then why not pass the 1080 signal (be it i or P) through component so
"Early Adopters" can take advantage of the new format and help it along
financially until it reaches the mass population? I know how you feel about
this already Jason.

Anthony R.
Orlando, FL

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:34 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Watermark and dynamic encryption are at the software layer - in other
words, independent of the physical connection. The data is store in
certain ways to ensure it isn't easily copied from disc to disc using a
computer, etc.

HDCP is at a different layer and implemented between devices that
support it. They are 'software agnostic' and will encrypt whatever is
put through them.

These layers are not interdependent but can be used together. In other
words, you could have a blu-ray system with dynamic encryption and no
HDCP connection, a system without encryption (like some DVDs) with HDCP,
or both.

Does that help?

Jason Burroughs


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
Of Anthony Rizzuto
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:30 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

So how does the "watermark" and "dynamic encryption" work in conjunction
with HDCP or are they separate entities doing different things?

Anthony R.
Orlando, FL

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html

Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
talking about in 3-4 months!

Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
seeing you all on HD.net :)

Jason Burroughs

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same day) send an email to:
[email protected]

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#7
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the requirement to have
such B-R players attached to the internet (all of the time)! It is also
claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R DVD, that the player
(not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code! Whether or not
the disabled player can be restored to operational status with a trip to
a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed at some length on
slashdot (/.) yesterday.

http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810

No one greeted this feature with positive enthusiasm. It looks like a
hackers dream, free targets for destruction all over the place!

This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much worse than the ill-fated
Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).

Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!

On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:46 -0400, Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Yes it does. If all of the new software manufactured to Blu-Ray's standards
> will have both the "watermark" and dynamic encryption, and further if the
> studios are confident enough in these processes to jump from one camp to the
> other, then why not pass the 1080 signal (be it i or P) through component so
> "Early Adopters" can take advantage of the new format and help it along
> financially until it reaches the mass population? I know how you feel about
> this already Jason.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:34 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Watermark and dynamic encryption are at the software layer - in other
> words, independent of the physical connection. The data is store in
> certain ways to ensure it isn't easily copied from disc to disc using a
> computer, etc.
>
> HDCP is at a different layer and implemented between devices that
> support it. They are 'software agnostic' and will encrypt whatever is
> put through them.
>
> These layers are not interdependent but can be used together. In other
> words, you could have a blu-ray system with dynamic encryption and no
> HDCP connection, a system without encryption (like some DVDs) with HDCP,
> or both.
>
> Does that help?
>
> Jason Burroughs
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
> Of Anthony Rizzuto
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:30 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> So how does the "watermark" and "dynamic encryption" work in conjunction
> with HDCP or are they separate entities doing different things?
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html
>
> Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
> feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
> delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
> tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
> talking about in 3-4 months!
>
> Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
> horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
> this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
> seeing you all on HD.net :)
>
> Jason Burroughs
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#8
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Yes it was called Divix. So you are saying that the current rumor is that
in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to have a constant internet
connection? Are these people out of their minds? Joe six-pack is not going
to have his house rewired in order to accommodate a dvd player. This in my
mind is a major disadvantage for the B-R camp. If I were Toshiba I would do
everything I could to get this out on the street. Talk about Nazi tactics.

Anthony R.
Orlando, FL

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Howard A. Blackstead
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:12 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the requirement to have
such B-R players attached to the internet (all of the time)! It is also
claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R DVD, that the player
(not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code! Whether or not
the disabled player can be restored to operational status with a trip to
a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed at some length on
slashdot (/.) yesterday.

http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810

No one greeted this feature with positive enthusiasm. It looks like a
hackers dream, free targets for destruction all over the place!

This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much worse than the ill-fated
Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).

Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!

On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:46 -0400, Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Yes it does. If all of the new software manufactured to Blu-Ray's
standards
> will have both the "watermark" and dynamic encryption, and further if the
> studios are confident enough in these processes to jump from one camp to
the
> other, then why not pass the 1080 signal (be it i or P) through component
so
> "Early Adopters" can take advantage of the new format and help it along
> financially until it reaches the mass population? I know how you feel
about
> this already Jason.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:34 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Watermark and dynamic encryption are at the software layer - in other
> words, independent of the physical connection. The data is store in
> certain ways to ensure it isn't easily copied from disc to disc using a
> computer, etc.
>
> HDCP is at a different layer and implemented between devices that
> support it. They are 'software agnostic' and will encrypt whatever is
> put through them.
>
> These layers are not interdependent but can be used together. In other
> words, you could have a blu-ray system with dynamic encryption and no
> HDCP connection, a system without encryption (like some DVDs) with HDCP,
> or both.
>
> Does that help?
>
> Jason Burroughs
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
> Of Anthony Rizzuto
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:30 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> So how does the "watermark" and "dynamic encryption" work in conjunction
> with HDCP or are they separate entities doing different things?
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html
>
> Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
> feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
> delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
> tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
> talking about in 3-4 months!
>
> Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
> horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
> this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
> seeing you all on HD.net :)
>
> Jason Burroughs
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#9
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Never underestimate the influence of the MPAA and it's ability to promote
stupidity in the marketplace.

Bob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Howard A. Blackstead
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:12 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the requirement to have
> such B-R players attached to the internet (all of the time)! It is also
> claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R DVD, that the player
> (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code! Whether or not
> the disabled player can be restored to operational status with a trip to
> a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed at some length on
> slashdot (/.) yesterday.
>
> http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810
>
> No one greeted this feature with positive enthusiasm. It looks like a
> hackers dream, free targets for destruction all over the place!
>
> This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much worse than the ill-fated
> Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).
>
> Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#10
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

The CC-DIVX story is reviewed at:

http://hometheater.about.com/library/we ... 062199.htm

It cost CC $114 million in losses. The new B-R story could be a whole
lot costlier! Protest groups opposing the DIVX format appeared. Perhaps
it would be good for similar groups to foment interest!

Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!


>
> Never underestimate the influence of the MPAA and it's ability to promote
> stupidity in the marketplace.
>
> Bob
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> > Howard A. Blackstead
> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:12 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine
> > Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the requirement to have
> > such B-R players attached to the internet (all of the time)! It is also
> > claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R DVD, that the player
> > (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code! Whether or not
> > the disabled player can be restored to operational status with a trip to
> > a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed at some length on
> > slashdot (/.) yesterday.
> >
> > http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810
> >
> > No one greeted this feature with positive enthusiasm. It looks like a
> > hackers dream, free targets for destruction all over the place!
> >
> > This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much worse than the ill-fated
> > Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).
> >
> > Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#11
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

This will not happen. Online DRM is just one of many approaches AACS can
take, and may be appropriate for some implementations of their
technology, but not for prerecorded movies bought and rented for home
use. If you want to read the actual specifications, check out
http://www.aacsla.com/specifications/specifications.htm.


Jason Burroughs


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
Of Bob Mankin
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:04 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Never underestimate the influence of the MPAA and it's ability to
promote
stupidity in the marketplace.

Bob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
Of
> Howard A. Blackstead
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:12 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the requirement to have
> such B-R players attached to the internet (all of the time)! It is
also
> claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R DVD, that the
player
> (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code! Whether or not
> the disabled player can be restored to operational status with a trip
to
> a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed at some length on
> slashdot (/.) yesterday.
>
> http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810
>
> No one greeted this feature with positive enthusiasm. It looks like a
> hackers dream, free targets for destruction all over the place!
>
> This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much worse than the
ill-fated
> Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).
>
> Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same day) send an email to:
[email protected]

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#12
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

A note from the real world.........neither of these will ever happen:

"that the player (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code"

"in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to have a constant internet
connection"

When stuff like this comes from the internet we should find a means of
setting the record straight and not perpetuate the rumor. Divix (?) was
such a poorly conceived idea I could not believe it was ever brought out by
CC. If they don't want any sales then a "self-destruct" or "connect to
internet" machine would be great. Mfg. and Hollywood are both seeing sales
of DVDs fall off and now a new format is needed and not just needed for
people like us but for everyone.

Hugh





----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Rizzuto" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray


> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Yes it was called Divix. So you are saying that the current rumor is that
> in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to have a constant internet
> connection? Are these people out of their minds? Joe six-pack is not
> going
> to have his house rewired in order to accommodate a dvd player. This in
> my
> mind is a major disadvantage for the B-R camp. If I were Toshiba I would
> do
> everything I could to get this out on the street. Talk about Nazi
> tactics.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Howard A. Blackstead
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:12 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the requirement to have
> such B-R players attached to the internet (all of the time)! It is also
> claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R DVD, that the player
> (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code! Whether or not
> the disabled player can be restored to operational status with a trip to
> a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed at some length on
> slashdot (/.) yesterday.
>
> http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810
>
> No one greeted this feature with positive enthusiasm. It looks like a
> hackers dream, free targets for destruction all over the place!
>
> This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much worse than the ill-fated
> Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).
>
> Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!
>
> On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:46 -0400, Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Yes it does. If all of the new software manufactured to Blu-Ray's
> standards
>> will have both the "watermark" and dynamic encryption, and further if the
>> studios are confident enough in these processes to jump from one camp to
> the
>> other, then why not pass the 1080 signal (be it i or P) through component
> so
>> "Early Adopters" can take advantage of the new format and help it along
>> financially until it reaches the mass population? I know how you feel
> about
>> this already Jason.
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:34 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Watermark and dynamic encryption are at the software layer - in other
>> words, independent of the physical connection. The data is store in
>> certain ways to ensure it isn't easily copied from disc to disc using a
>> computer, etc.
>>
>> HDCP is at a different layer and implemented between devices that
>> support it. They are 'software agnostic' and will encrypt whatever is
>> put through them.
>>
>> These layers are not interdependent but can be used together. In other
>> words, you could have a blu-ray system with dynamic encryption and no
>> HDCP connection, a system without encryption (like some DVDs) with HDCP,
>> or both.
>>
>> Does that help?
>>
>> Jason Burroughs
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
>> Of Anthony Rizzuto
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:30 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> So how does the "watermark" and "dynamic encryption" work in conjunction
>> with HDCP or are they separate entities doing different things?
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html
>>
>> Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
>> feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
>> delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
>> tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
>> talking about in 3-4 months!
>>
>> Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
>> horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
>> this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
>> seeing you all on HD.net :)
>>
>> Jason Burroughs
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#13
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I remember vividly when Cicuit City came out with
DIVX. It was early in the DVD general launch, and
potentially further confused the adoption of DVD.

It was conceived by a bunch of lawyers (no offense to
any legal folks here) :).

I started boycotting CC then, and to this day avoid
spending money there.



--- "Howard A. Blackstead" <[email protected]> wrote:

> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> The CC-DIVX story is reviewed at:
>
>
http://hometheater.about.com/library/we ... 062199.htm
>
> It cost CC $114 million in losses. The new B-R story
> could be a whole
> lot costlier! Protest groups opposing the DIVX
> format appeared. Perhaps
> it would be good for similar groups to foment
> interest!
>
> Howard in South Bend, where football is being
> practiced!
>
>
> >
> > Never underestimate the influence of the MPAA and
> it's ability to promote
> > stupidity in the marketplace.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: HDTV Magazine
> On Behalf
> Of
> > > Howard A. Blackstead
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:12 PM
> > > To: HDTV Magazine
> > > Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
> > >
> > > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> > >
> > > Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the
> requirement to have
> > > such B-R players attached to the internet (all
> of the time)! It is also
> > > claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated
> B-R DVD, that the player
> > > (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct
> code! Whether or not
> > > the disabled player can be restored to
> operational status with a trip to
> > > a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed
> at some length on
> > > slashdot (/.) yesterday.
> > >
> > > http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810
> > >
> > > No one greeted this feature with positive
> enthusiasm. It looks like a
> > > hackers dream, free targets for destruction all
> over the place!
> > >
> > > This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much
> worse than the ill-fated
> > > Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).
> > >
> > > Howard in South Bend, where football is being
> practiced!
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click:
> [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made
> from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click:
> [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made
> from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#14
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Jason,

Regarding your question below, other than the models of both formats that I included on the CES
reports throughout the years, and the Hi Def DVD article I wrote for DVDetc (that I believe you
already have), I did not make any efforts in obtaining any more updates from the back channels.

I have followed Hi Def DVD and their "US prototypes" for more than 5 years and in my book it has
reached the official level of a circus, I am exhausted with these fools.

I know they will continue to make software and hardware changes up to the last minute in an effort
of both formats to win the battle. Even the discs are changing, so I am not surprised content
providers are holding their plans to a tentative lower scale of releases.

If I would be a studio I would not want to release a movie on a dual layer 30GB disc when HD DVD is
already doing 45GB capacity on 3 layers and a hybrid version of HD DVD/Regular DVD in one disc. As
a studio, I would arrange with the player manufacturer and the disc maker for the necessary effort
to use such advances in a rush to avoid more confusion and consumer tensions.

As a consumer I would be disappointed that after I bought the "basic" HD DVD player for the pocket
change of $1000 and plain HD only discs, the same manufacturer and content provider come up right
after with the hybrid extended play version of disc and player, a version that would allow me to
also play the regular DVD movie layer on regular DVD players I own on the car, boat, kid's room, etc
without buying several copies for backward compatibility with DVD, or to have a larger collection of
classical music of the same composer on a single disc, not to mention multiple seasons of popular TV
series).

The same applies to Blu-ray, they have done 100GB, 200GB, and hybrid, but in their case the larger
capacity makes the opportunities for storing content much more appealing than HD DVD.

Unfortunately, many uninformed people will be suck on the first wave, but the electronics industry
is always that way.

The mess on this circus has now at least two major dimensions:

a) the battle of the format domination, and
b) the battle for extended/hybrid discs,

Both at the expense of the consumer, we all.

Regarding you comment of not attending the Display Search HDTV Conference next week, I am sorry to
hear that I was looking forward to see you there. I frankly hope Hi Def DVD will not be there, I
would be looking pretty mad at them in the HD Net camera (as you said).

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra








-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html

Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
talking about in 3-4 months!

Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
seeing you all on HD.net :)

Jason Burroughs

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#15
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Thanks Hugh. I would certainly hope this would not be the case. Given the
fact that there is an excellent chance that they are going to cut out the
early adopters (the old Component/DVI/HDMI bit) who in the world would they
have been marketing to using the draconian copy protection methods described
below. Blu-Ray would have been still born as would HD DVD although with the
latter that rapidly seems to be the case regardless. I will say this
however. As much as we have decried the two format situation ( I include
myself in that) ultimately this may have real benefits to the consumer as
competition between the two may cause improvements prior to initial release
that would normally have waited until after the fact. Just my two cents.

Anthony R.
Orlando, FL

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Hugh Campbell
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:13 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

A note from the real world.........neither of these will ever happen:

"that the player (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code"

"in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to have a constant internet
connection"

When stuff like this comes from the internet we should find a means of
setting the record straight and not perpetuate the rumor. Divix (?) was
such a poorly conceived idea I could not believe it was ever brought out by
CC. If they don't want any sales then a "self-destruct" or "connect to
internet" machine would be great. Mfg. and Hollywood are both seeing sales
of DVDs fall off and now a new format is needed and not just needed for
people like us but for everyone.

Hugh





----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Rizzuto" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray


> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Yes it was called Divix. So you are saying that the current rumor is that
> in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to have a constant internet
> connection? Are these people out of their minds? Joe six-pack is not
> going
> to have his house rewired in order to accommodate a dvd player. This in
> my
> mind is a major disadvantage for the B-R camp. If I were Toshiba I would
> do
> everything I could to get this out on the street. Talk about Nazi
> tactics.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Howard A. Blackstead
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:12 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the requirement to have
> such B-R players attached to the internet (all of the time)! It is also
> claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R DVD, that the player
> (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code! Whether or not
> the disabled player can be restored to operational status with a trip to
> a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed at some length on
> slashdot (/.) yesterday.
>
> http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810
>
> No one greeted this feature with positive enthusiasm. It looks like a
> hackers dream, free targets for destruction all over the place!
>
> This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much worse than the ill-fated
> Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).
>
> Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!
>
> On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:46 -0400, Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Yes it does. If all of the new software manufactured to Blu-Ray's
> standards
>> will have both the "watermark" and dynamic encryption, and further if the
>> studios are confident enough in these processes to jump from one camp to
> the
>> other, then why not pass the 1080 signal (be it i or P) through component
> so
>> "Early Adopters" can take advantage of the new format and help it along
>> financially until it reaches the mass population? I know how you feel
> about
>> this already Jason.
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:34 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Watermark and dynamic encryption are at the software layer - in other
>> words, independent of the physical connection. The data is store in
>> certain ways to ensure it isn't easily copied from disc to disc using a
>> computer, etc.
>>
>> HDCP is at a different layer and implemented between devices that
>> support it. They are 'software agnostic' and will encrypt whatever is
>> put through them.
>>
>> These layers are not interdependent but can be used together. In other
>> words, you could have a blu-ray system with dynamic encryption and no
>> HDCP connection, a system without encryption (like some DVDs) with HDCP,
>> or both.
>>
>> Does that help?
>>
>> Jason Burroughs
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
>> Of Anthony Rizzuto
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:30 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> So how does the "watermark" and "dynamic encryption" work in conjunction
>> with HDCP or are they separate entities doing different things?
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html
>>
>> Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
>> feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
>> delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
>> tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
>> talking about in 3-4 months!
>>
>> Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
>> horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
>> this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
>> seeing you all on HD.net :)
>>
>> Jason Burroughs
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#16
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

If indeed high definition DVD in whatever format does
not include component, then it will be that much
easier for me to be patient and wait out the early
market shakeout, as I'm not ready to replace my Elite
610HD, until the large lcd/plasma's come down in
price.

--- Anthony Rizzuto <[email protected]> wrote:

> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Thanks Hugh. I would certainly hope this would not
> be the case. Given the
> fact that there is an excellent chance that they are
> going to cut out the
> early adopters (the old Component/DVI/HDMI bit) who
> in the world would they
> have been marketing to using the draconian copy
> protection methods described
> below. Blu-Ray would have been still born as would
> HD DVD although with the
> latter that rapidly seems to be the case regardless.
> I will say this
> however. As much as we have decried the two format
> situation ( I include
> myself in that) ultimately this may have real
> benefits to the consumer as
> competition between the two may cause improvements
> prior to initial release
> that would normally have waited until after the
> fact. Just my two cents.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine
> On Behalf Of
> Hugh Campbell
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:13 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> A note from the real world.........neither of these
> will ever happen:
>
> "that the player (not the media) will be disabled
> with a destruct code"
>
> "in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to
> have a constant internet
> connection"
>
> When stuff like this comes from the internet we
> should find a means of
> setting the record straight and not perpetuate the
> rumor. Divix (?) was
> such a poorly conceived idea I could not believe it
> was ever brought out by
> CC. If they don't want any sales then a
> "self-destruct" or "connect to
> internet" machine would be great. Mfg. and
> Hollywood are both seeing sales
> of DVDs fall off and now a new format is needed and
> not just needed for
> people like us but for everyone.
>
> Hugh
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Rizzuto" <[email protected]>
> To: "HDTV Magazine"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Yes it was called Divix. So you are saying that
> the current rumor is that
> > in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to
> have a constant internet
> > connection? Are these people out of their minds?
> Joe six-pack is not
> > going
> > to have his house rewired in order to accommodate
> a dvd player. This in
> > my
> > mind is a major disadvantage for the B-R camp. If
> I were Toshiba I would
> > do
> > everything I could to get this out on the street.
> Talk about Nazi
> > tactics.
> >
> > Anthony R.
> > Orlando, FL
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine
> On Behalf Of
> > Howard A. Blackstead
> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:12 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine
> > Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
> >
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the
> requirement to have
> > such B-R players attached to the internet (all of
> the time)! It is also
> > claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R
> DVD, that the player
> > (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct
> code! Whether or not
> > the disabled player can be restored to operational
> status with a trip to
> > a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed
> at some length on
> > slashdot (/.) yesterday.
> >
> > http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810
> >
> > No one greeted this feature with positive
> enthusiasm. It looks like a
> > hackers dream, free targets for destruction all
> over the place!
> >
> > This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much
> worse than the ill-fated
> > Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).
> >
> > Howard in South Bend, where football is being
> practiced!
> >
> > On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:46 -0400, Anthony Rizzuto
> wrote:
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> Yes it does. If all of the new software
> manufactured to Blu-Ray's
> > standards
> >> will have both the "watermark" and dynamic
> encryption, and further if the
> >> studios are confident enough in these processes
> to jump from one camp to
> > the
> >> other, then why not pass the 1080 signal (be it i
> or P) through component
> > so
> >> "Early Adopters" can take advantage of the new
> format and help it along
> >> financially until it reaches the mass population?
> I know how you feel
> > about
> >> this already Jason.
> >>
> >> Anthony R.
> >> Orlando, FL
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: HDTV Magazine
> On Behalf Of
> >> [email protected]
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:34 AM
> >> To: HDTV Magazine
> >> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> Watermark and dynamic encryption are at the
> software layer - in other
> >> words, independent of the physical connection.
> The data is store in
> >> certain ways to ensure it isn't easily copied
> from disc to disc using a
> >> computer, etc.
> >>
> >> HDCP is at a different layer and implemented
> between devices that
> >> support it. They are 'software agnostic' and will
> encrypt whatever is
> >> put through them.
> >>
> >> These layers are not interdependent but can be
> used together. In other
> >> words, you could have a blu-ray system with
> dynamic encryption and no
> >> HDCP connection, a system without encryption
> (like some DVDs) with HDCP,
> >> or both.
> >>
> >> Does that help?
> >>
> >> Jason Burroughs
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: HDTV Magazine
>
=== message truncated ===


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#17
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Rodolfo, I agree that it's a circus and I have stayed out of the details
for the most part. With Christmas only 4 months away, things had better
start falling into place quickly if there is any hope of getting product
in the consumer's hands by the holiday season.

My prediction: there will be both hd-dvd and blu-ray product on the
shelves, with a handful of titles and all will sell out quickly,
including the oft-quoted $1000 players. NEXT year, we will see the real
battle for domination, which will be based almost entirely on the
backwards-compatibility you mentioned. There are simply not enough of
'us' to make either product a winner without the average consumer buying
a hybrid unit for the living room and putting their old dvd player in
the kids room.

Jason Burroughs

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:48 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Jason,

Regarding your question below, other than the models of both formats
that I included on the CES
reports throughout the years, and the Hi Def DVD article I wrote for
DVDetc (that I believe you
already have), I did not make any efforts in obtaining any more updates
from the back channels.

I have followed Hi Def DVD and their "US prototypes" for more than 5
years and in my book it has
reached the official level of a circus, I am exhausted with these fools.

I know they will continue to make software and hardware changes up to
the last minute in an effort
of both formats to win the battle. Even the discs are changing, so I am
not surprised content
providers are holding their plans to a tentative lower scale of
releases.

If I would be a studio I would not want to release a movie on a dual
layer 30GB disc when HD DVD is
already doing 45GB capacity on 3 layers and a hybrid version of HD
DVD/Regular DVD in one disc. As
a studio, I would arrange with the player manufacturer and the disc
maker for the necessary effort
to use such advances in a rush to avoid more confusion and consumer
tensions.

As a consumer I would be disappointed that after I bought the "basic" HD
DVD player for the pocket
change of $1000 and plain HD only discs, the same manufacturer and
content provider come up right
after with the hybrid extended play version of disc and player, a
version that would allow me to
also play the regular DVD movie layer on regular DVD players I own on
the car, boat, kid's room, etc
without buying several copies for backward compatibility with DVD, or to
have a larger collection of
classical music of the same composer on a single disc, not to mention
multiple seasons of popular TV
series).

The same applies to Blu-ray, they have done 100GB, 200GB, and hybrid,
but in their case the larger
capacity makes the opportunities for storing content much more appealing
than HD DVD.

Unfortunately, many uninformed people will be suck on the first wave,
but the electronics industry
is always that way.

The mess on this circus has now at least two major dimensions:

a) the battle of the format domination, and
b) the battle for extended/hybrid discs,

Both at the expense of the consumer, we all.

Regarding you comment of not attending the Display Search HDTV
Conference next week, I am sorry to
hear that I was looking forward to see you there. I frankly hope Hi
Def DVD will not be there, I
would be looking pretty mad at them in the HD Net camera (as you said).

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra








-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Another point for Blu-ray


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html

Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
talking about in 3-4 months!

Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
seeing you all on HD.net :)

Jason Burroughs

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same day) send an email to:
[email protected]

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]