----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
Hmmm.........poor frequency response. Does that mean the picture was poor?
Just kidding you. As you probably remember I've got a JVC D-VHS from long
ago and never did think the picture quality was that stunning versus 480p
DVD. Better yes.........fantastically better, no.
Hugh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Fisher" <
[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine" <
[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: HD-DVD compared to D-VHS?
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> As good as DVHS is or was the technical performance was quite shabby for
> frequency response unless you used the 1394 to another D/A convertor and
> even then that only took you from shabby to poor.
>
> Have not tested DVHS with DVI/HDMI connections; don't have that player.
>
> Can't say the new HD-DVD will be any different for analog component but if
> HDMI/DVI in your display chain is up to snuff hopefully we can now get a
> full and flat frequency response.
>
> Richard Fisher
>
www.HDLibrary.com Published by Tech Services
> A division of Mastertech Repair Corporation
>
> Hugh Campbell wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> When someone gets one of the Toshiba HD-DVD players I would like to know
>> how it compares to JVC's D-VHS. I've seen comments to the effect that
>> it is superior to D-VHS and I would question that but who knows.
>>
>> Hugh
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click:
[email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>>
[email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click:
[email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
>
[email protected]
>
To unsubscribe please click:
[email protected]
To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected] 