----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
Maybe Blu-Ray will be the only one!
http://www.avrev.com/news/0805/18.hdtrouble.html
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Hugh Campbell
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:13 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
A note from the real world.........neither of these will ever happen:
"that the player (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code"
"in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to have a constant internet
connection"
When stuff like this comes from the internet we should find a means of
setting the record straight and not perpetuate the rumor. Divix (?) was
such a poorly conceived idea I could not believe it was ever brought out by
CC. If they don't want any sales then a "self-destruct" or "connect to
internet" machine would be great. Mfg. and Hollywood are both seeing sales
of DVDs fall off and now a new format is needed and not just needed for
people like us but for everyone.
Hugh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Rizzuto" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Yes it was called Divix. So you are saying that the current rumor is that
> in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to have a constant internet
> connection? Are these people out of their minds? Joe six-pack is not
> going
> to have his house rewired in order to accommodate a dvd player. This in
> my
> mind is a major disadvantage for the B-R camp. If I were Toshiba I would
> do
> everything I could to get this out on the street. Talk about Nazi
> tactics.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Howard A. Blackstead
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:12 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the requirement to have
> such B-R players attached to the internet (all of the time)! It is also
> claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R DVD, that the player
> (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code! Whether or not
> the disabled player can be restored to operational status with a trip to
> a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed at some length on
> slashdot (/.) yesterday.
>
> http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810
>
> No one greeted this feature with positive enthusiasm. It looks like a
> hackers dream, free targets for destruction all over the place!
>
> This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much worse than the ill-fated
> Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).
>
> Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!
>
> On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:46 -0400, Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Yes it does. If all of the new software manufactured to Blu-Ray's
> standards
>> will have both the "watermark" and dynamic encryption, and further if the
>> studios are confident enough in these processes to jump from one camp to
> the
>> other, then why not pass the 1080 signal (be it i or P) through component
> so
>> "Early Adopters" can take advantage of the new format and help it along
>> financially until it reaches the mass population? I know how you feel
> about
>> this already Jason.
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:34 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Watermark and dynamic encryption are at the software layer - in other
>> words, independent of the physical connection. The data is store in
>> certain ways to ensure it isn't easily copied from disc to disc using a
>> computer, etc.
>>
>> HDCP is at a different layer and implemented between devices that
>> support it. They are 'software agnostic' and will encrypt whatever is
>> put through them.
>>
>> These layers are not interdependent but can be used together. In other
>> words, you could have a blu-ray system with dynamic encryption and no
>> HDCP connection, a system without encryption (like some DVDs) with HDCP,
>> or both.
>>
>> Does that help?
>>
>> Jason Burroughs
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
>> Of Anthony Rizzuto
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:30 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> So how does the "watermark" and "dynamic encryption" work in conjunction
>> with HDCP or are they separate entities doing different things?
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html
>>
>> Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
>> feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
>> delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
>> tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
>> talking about in 3-4 months!
>>
>> Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
>> horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
>> this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
>> seeing you all on HD.net
>>
>> Jason Burroughs
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
Maybe Blu-Ray will be the only one!
http://www.avrev.com/news/0805/18.hdtrouble.html
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Hugh Campbell
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:13 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
A note from the real world.........neither of these will ever happen:
"that the player (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code"
"in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to have a constant internet
connection"
When stuff like this comes from the internet we should find a means of
setting the record straight and not perpetuate the rumor. Divix (?) was
such a poorly conceived idea I could not believe it was ever brought out by
CC. If they don't want any sales then a "self-destruct" or "connect to
internet" machine would be great. Mfg. and Hollywood are both seeing sales
of DVDs fall off and now a new format is needed and not just needed for
people like us but for everyone.
Hugh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Rizzuto" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Yes it was called Divix. So you are saying that the current rumor is that
> in order to use a Blu-Ray player it will have to have a constant internet
> connection? Are these people out of their minds? Joe six-pack is not
> going
> to have his house rewired in order to accommodate a dvd player. This in
> my
> mind is a major disadvantage for the B-R camp. If I were Toshiba I would
> do
> everything I could to get this out on the street. Talk about Nazi
> tactics.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Howard A. Blackstead
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:12 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Guys: Another aspect of the announced DRM is the requirement to have
> such B-R players attached to the internet (all of the time)! It is also
> claimed that if one attempts to play a pirated B-R DVD, that the player
> (not the media) will be disabled with a destruct code! Whether or not
> the disabled player can be restored to operational status with a trip to
> a repair shop is not decided. This was discussed at some length on
> slashdot (/.) yesterday.
>
> http://slashdot.org/index.pl?issue=20050810
>
> No one greeted this feature with positive enthusiasm. It looks like a
> hackers dream, free targets for destruction all over the place!
>
> This looks like a Frankenstein's Monster, much worse than the ill-fated
> Circuit-City DVD system (was it called DivX?).
>
> Howard in South Bend, where football is being practiced!
>
> On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:46 -0400, Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Yes it does. If all of the new software manufactured to Blu-Ray's
> standards
>> will have both the "watermark" and dynamic encryption, and further if the
>> studios are confident enough in these processes to jump from one camp to
> the
>> other, then why not pass the 1080 signal (be it i or P) through component
> so
>> "Early Adopters" can take advantage of the new format and help it along
>> financially until it reaches the mass population? I know how you feel
> about
>> this already Jason.
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:34 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Watermark and dynamic encryption are at the software layer - in other
>> words, independent of the physical connection. The data is store in
>> certain ways to ensure it isn't easily copied from disc to disc using a
>> computer, etc.
>>
>> HDCP is at a different layer and implemented between devices that
>> support it. They are 'software agnostic' and will encrypt whatever is
>> put through them.
>>
>> These layers are not interdependent but can be used together. In other
>> words, you could have a blu-ray system with dynamic encryption and no
>> HDCP connection, a system without encryption (like some DVDs) with HDCP,
>> or both.
>>
>> Does that help?
>>
>> Jason Burroughs
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
>> Of Anthony Rizzuto
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:30 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> So how does the "watermark" and "dynamic encryption" work in conjunction
>> with HDCP or are they separate entities doing different things?
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:23 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Another point for Blu-ray
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050810-5194.html
>>
>> Looks more and more like the tide is turning towards Blu-ray. My gut
>> feeling is that Christmas 2005 will be over promised and under
>> delivered...a few titles and even fewer players; I hope my fellow
>> tipsters are saving their pennies for the $1000 player we'll all be
>> talking about in 3-4 months!
>>
>> Rodolfo, any news on your end of *real* blu-ray/hddvd players on the
>> horizon? I was hoping to get more info at the HD Conference in LA later
>> this month, but will be unable to attend. I'll be looking forward to
>> seeing you all on HD.net
>>
>> Jason Burroughs
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]