HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday

Started by ar2261 Jan 10, 2007 12 posts
Read-only archive
#1
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the journalist was making suggestions of what to purchase and what to wait on purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on the purchase of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested that it was quite possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI interface in favor of something else, although he did not mention what the alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that effect? That would certainly turn things upside down. Any comments one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.

Anthony R.
Orlando, FL

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#2
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace HDMI, as
well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes sense to move
toward one connector for all digital video - especially if it is "pin
compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.

Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort

I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki it"!

Jason

Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the journalist was making suggestions of what to purchase and what to wait on purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on the purchase of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested that it was quite possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI interface in favor of something else, although he did not mention what the alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that effect? That would certainly turn things upside down. Any comments one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#3
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Jason,

Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you say that it makes sense to move toward on connector for all digital video but what about consumers who have invested millions of dollars (collectively) in audio and video equipped with HDMI, what happens to them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we go again, the article in the link states that "the display port Video signal is not compatible with DVI or HDMI". The article further states that there is yet another competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This just boggles the mind. Not the fact that there are competing technologies but the fact that it seems that no one is willing to settle on a long term standard. I know that a lot of this is driven by the computer side but as I've said on more than one occasion, consumers grasp the concept of bigger, better, faster with cell phone and computer technology, but with price points of 2.5k and up that is a difficult concept when it comes to televisions. Just my two cents. Thanks again for the info.

Anthony R.
Orlando, FL

----- Original Message ----
From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace HDMI, as
well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes sense to move
toward one connector for all digital video - especially if it is "pin
compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.

Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort

I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki it"!

Jason

Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the journalist was making suggestions of what to purchase and what to wait on purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on the purchase of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested that it was quite possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI interface in favor of something else, although he did not mention what the alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that effect? That would certainly turn things upside down. Any comments one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#4
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I believe Rodolfo has some more info on this. If I recall correctly,
they are in essence competitors to HDMI. When the initiative started,
their goal was to provide wider bandwidth that HDMI for video, but with
1.3 that has become a non-issue. I'll defer to Rodolfo to fill in the
details.

Shane Sturgeon


Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Jason,
>
> Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you say that it makes sense to move toward on connector for all digital video but what about consumers who have invested millions of dollars (collectively) in audio and video equipped with HDMI, what happens to them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we go again, the article in the link states that "the display port Video signal is not compatible with DVI or HDMI". The article further states that there is yet another competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This just boggles the mind. Not the fact that there are competing technologies but the fact that it seems that no one is willing to settle on a long term standard. I know that a lot of this is driven by the computer side but as I've said on more than one occasion, consumers grasp the concept of bigger, better, faster with cell phone and computer technology, but with price points of 2.5k and up that is a difficult concept when it comes to televisions. Just my two cents. Thanks again for the info.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
> To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
> Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace HDMI, as
> well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes sense to move
> toward one connector for all digital video - especially if it is "pin
> compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.
>
> Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort
>
> I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki it"!
>
> Jason
>
> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the journalist was making suggestions of what to purchase and what to wait on purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on the purchase of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested that it was quite possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI interface in favor of something else, although he did not mention what the alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that effect? That would certainly turn things upside down. Any comments one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#5
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I discussed this subject with HDMI Licensing before CES but did not have the
chance to talk with DP yet. I do not feel appropriate for me to comment
until I do so; there are always two sides of any story.

Additionally I still have another meeting pending with SI and HDMI here at
CES and the information I have (about why another format) might become more
logical (to consumers).

To analyze the subject properly on should also bring HDMI wireless to the
picture.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Shane Sturgeon
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:41 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I believe Rodolfo has some more info on this. If I recall correctly,
they are in essence competitors to HDMI. When the initiative started,
their goal was to provide wider bandwidth that HDMI for video, but with
1.3 that has become a non-issue. I'll defer to Rodolfo to fill in the
details.

Shane Sturgeon


Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Jason,
>
> Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you say that it
makes sense to move toward on connector for all digital video but what about
consumers who have invested millions of dollars (collectively) in audio and
video equipped with HDMI, what happens to them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we
go again, the article in the link states that "the display port Video signal
is not compatible with DVI or HDMI". The article further states that there
is yet another competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This just boggles the mind.
Not the fact that there are competing technologies but the fact that it
seems that no one is willing to settle on a long term standard. I know that
a lot of this is driven by the computer side but as I've said on more than
one occasion, consumers grasp the concept of bigger, better, faster with
cell phone and computer technology, but with price points of 2.5k and up
that is a difficult concept when it comes to televisions. Just my two
cents. Thanks again for the info.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
> To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
> Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace HDMI, as
> well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes sense to move
> toward one connector for all digital video - especially if it is "pin
> compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.
>
> Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort
>
> I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki it"!
>
> Jason
>
> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly provided
a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The Thursday edition had
on article on the CES in which the journalist was making suggestions of what
to purchase and what to wait on purchasing. In the article he mentioned
waiting on the purchase of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested
that it was quite possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI
interface in favor of something else, although he did not mention what the
alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that effect?
That would certainly turn things upside down. Any comments one way or the
other would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#6
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Thanks Rodolfo,

I eagerly await your report.

Anthony R.
Orlando, FL

----- Original Message ----
From: Rodolfo La Maestra <[email protected]>
To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:15:34 PM
Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I discussed this subject with HDMI Licensing before CES but did not have the
chance to talk with DP yet. I do not feel appropriate for me to comment
until I do so; there are always two sides of any story.

Additionally I still have another meeting pending with SI and HDMI here at
CES and the information I have (about why another format) might become more
logical (to consumers).

To analyze the subject properly on should also bring HDMI wireless to the
picture.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Shane Sturgeon
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:41 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I believe Rodolfo has some more info on this. If I recall correctly,
they are in essence competitors to HDMI. When the initiative started,
their goal was to provide wider bandwidth that HDMI for video, but with
1.3 that has become a non-issue. I'll defer to Rodolfo to fill in the
details.

Shane Sturgeon


Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Jason,
>
> Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you say that it
makes sense to move toward on connector for all digital video but what about
consumers who have invested millions of dollars (collectively) in audio and
video equipped with HDMI, what happens to them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we
go again, the article in the link states that "the display port Video signal
is not compatible with DVI or HDMI". The article further states that there
is yet another competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This just boggles the mind.
Not the fact that there are competing technologies but the fact that it
seems that no one is willing to settle on a long term standard. I know that
a lot of this is driven by the computer side but as I've said on more than
one occasion, consumers grasp the concept of bigger, better, faster with
cell phone and computer technology, but with price points of 2.5k and up
that is a difficult concept when it comes to televisions. Just my two
cents. Thanks again for the info.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
> To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
> Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace HDMI, as
> well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes sense to move
> toward one connector for all digital video - especially if it is "pin
> compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.
>
> Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort
>
> I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki it"!
>
> Jason
>
> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly provided
a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The Thursday edition had
on article on the CES in which the journalist was making suggestions of what
to purchase and what to wait on purchasing. In the article he mentioned
waiting on the purchase of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested
that it was quite possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI
interface in favor of something else, although he did not mention what the
alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that effect?
That would certainly turn things upside down. Any comments one way or the
other would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#7
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Anthony, I'm also very interested in Rodolfo's comments after CES, but I
personally see DisplayPort as more than just another short term
standard. The venerable VGA cable has been present on monitors/computers
for probably 20 years, and with improvements in the software, has kept
the same form factor from 640x480 all the way up to 1920x1080. DVI was a
non-encrypted digital interface that really wasn't up to the task of
being the next generation interface, but served to help LCD monitors
overthrow CRT displays. Now that acceptable encryption is here, and many
displays go beyond DVI's 1920x1080 limit (correct me if I'm wrong, but
"dual link DVI" is required beyond 1920x1080/60), we must have something
that can address the multitude of higher res displays, compatibility
with protected content such as HD DVD and Blu-Ray, and better support
for multiple displays. Because we are moving from one digital format to
another, the "transition" should be MUCH less painful, as it's easy to
convert from one software protocol to another, when compared to
converted analog to digital and digital to analog. Any major issues the
come up will likely be more on the software side than hardware - as in,
this DVI monitor doesn't support HDCP, so I can't connect anything with
protected content to it. If there's a DisplayPort monitor and a DVI
computer (for example), there will likely be a 'dongle' cable that will
convert from one to the other. The same thing should go for an HDMI
television with a DisplayPort cable box (for example). Again, as long as
they support the same software protocols like HDCP, etc., they should be
just as compatible as DVI and HDMI.

Some of that is my own hope coming through, so please slap me back into
reality if needed!

Jason

Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Jason,
>
> Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you say that it makes sense to move toward on connector for all digital video but what about consumers who have invested millions of dollars (collectively) in audio and video equipped with HDMI, what happens to them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we go again, the article in the link states that "the display port Video signal is not compatible with DVI or HDMI". The article further states that there is yet another competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This just boggles the mind. Not the fact that there are competing technologies but the fact that it seems that no one is willing to settle on a long term standard. I know that a lot of this is driven by the computer side but as I've said on more than one occasion, consumers grasp the concept of bigger, better, faster with cell phone and computer technology, but with price points of 2.5k and up that is a difficult concept when it comes to televisions. Just my two cents. Thanks again for the info.
>
> Anthony R.
> Orlando, FL
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
> To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
> Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace HDMI, as
> well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes sense to move
> toward one connector for all digital video - especially if it is "pin
> compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.
>
> Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort
>
> I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki it"!
>
> Jason
>
> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the journalist was making suggestions of what to purchase and what to wait on purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on the purchase of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested that it was quite possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI interface in favor of something else, although he did not mention what the alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that effect? That would certainly turn things upside down. Any comments one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#8
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

compared with VGA and DVI, Agreed. But what about vs. HDMI? Do we
really need another connection type? What does it get me that HDMI 1.3
can't?

Shane Sturgeon


Jason Burroughs wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Anthony, I'm also very interested in Rodolfo's comments after CES, but
> I personally see DisplayPort as more than just another short term
> standard. The venerable VGA cable has been present on
> monitors/computers for probably 20 years, and with improvements in the
> software, has kept the same form factor from 640x480 all the way up to
> 1920x1080. DVI was a non-encrypted digital interface that really
> wasn't up to the task of being the next generation interface, but
> served to help LCD monitors overthrow CRT displays. Now that
> acceptable encryption is here, and many displays go beyond DVI's
> 1920x1080 limit (correct me if I'm wrong, but "dual link DVI" is
> required beyond 1920x1080/60), we must have something that can address
> the multitude of higher res displays, compatibility with protected
> content such as HD DVD and Blu-Ray, and better support for multiple
> displays. Because we are moving from one digital format to another,
> the "transition" should be MUCH less painful, as it's easy to convert
> from one software protocol to another, when compared to converted
> analog to digital and digital to analog. Any major issues the come up
> will likely be more on the software side than hardware - as in, this
> DVI monitor doesn't support HDCP, so I can't connect anything with
> protected content to it. If there's a DisplayPort monitor and a DVI
> computer (for example), there will likely be a 'dongle' cable that
> will convert from one to the other. The same thing should go for an
> HDMI television with a DisplayPort cable box (for example). Again, as
> long as they support the same software protocols like HDCP, etc., they
> should be just as compatible as DVI and HDMI.
>
> Some of that is my own hope coming through, so please slap me back
> into reality if needed!
>
> Jason
>
> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Jason,
>> Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you say that it
>> makes sense to move toward on connector for all digital video but
>> what about consumers who have invested millions of dollars
>> (collectively) in audio and video equipped with HDMI, what happens to
>> them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we go again, the article in the link
>> states that "the display port Video signal is not compatible with DVI
>> or HDMI". The article further states that there is yet another
>> competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This just boggles the mind. Not the
>> fact that there are competing technologies but the fact that it seems
>> that no one is willing to settle on a long term standard. I know
>> that a lot of this is driven by the computer side but as I've said on
>> more than one occasion, consumers grasp the concept of bigger,
>> better, faster with cell phone and computer technology, but with
>> price points of 2.5k and up that is a difficult concept when it comes
>> to televisions. Just my two cents. Thanks again for the info.
>>
>> Anthony R.
>> Orlando, FL
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
>> To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
>> Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace HDMI,
>> as well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes sense to
>> move toward one connector for all digital video - especially if it is
>> "pin compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.
>>
>> Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort
>>
>> I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki it"!
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>>
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly
>>> provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The
>>> Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the journalist
>>> was making suggestions of what to purchase and what to wait on
>>> purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on the purchase of
>>> either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested that it was quite
>>> possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI interface in
>>> favor of something else, although he did not mention what the
>>> alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that
>>> effect? That would certainly turn things upside down. Any comments
>>> one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Anthony R.
>>> Orlando, FL
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#9
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Oh I left that part out completely. HDMI is owned by HDMI, LLC and
charges royalty fees (like many technologies). DisplayPort is an
industry standard that does not involve much, if any, proprietary
company information (although Philips developed an optional encryption
method). I think that is a key differentiator. Also, the connector locks
into place like Ethernet, and is keyed for easier insertion. It's been
touted as "hdmi for computers" by some.

Jason

Shane Sturgeon wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> compared with VGA and DVI, Agreed. But what about vs. HDMI? Do we
> really need another connection type? What does it get me that HDMI 1.3
> can't?
>
> Shane Sturgeon
>
>
> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Anthony, I'm also very interested in Rodolfo's comments after CES,
>> but I personally see DisplayPort as more than just another short term
>> standard. The venerable VGA cable has been present on
>> monitors/computers for probably 20 years, and with improvements in
>> the software, has kept the same form factor from 640x480 all the way
>> up to 1920x1080. DVI was a non-encrypted digital interface that
>> really wasn't up to the task of being the next generation interface,
>> but served to help LCD monitors overthrow CRT displays. Now that
>> acceptable encryption is here, and many displays go beyond DVI's
>> 1920x1080 limit (correct me if I'm wrong, but "dual link DVI" is
>> required beyond 1920x1080/60), we must have something that can
>> address the multitude of higher res displays, compatibility with
>> protected content such as HD DVD and Blu-Ray, and better support for
>> multiple displays. Because we are moving from one digital format to
>> another, the "transition" should be MUCH less painful, as it's easy
>> to convert from one software protocol to another, when compared to
>> converted analog to digital and digital to analog. Any major issues
>> the come up will likely be more on the software side than hardware -
>> as in, this DVI monitor doesn't support HDCP, so I can't connect
>> anything with protected content to it. If there's a DisplayPort
>> monitor and a DVI computer (for example), there will likely be a
>> 'dongle' cable that will convert from one to the other. The same
>> thing should go for an HDMI television with a DisplayPort cable box
>> (for example). Again, as long as they support the same software
>> protocols like HDCP, etc., they should be just as compatible as DVI
>> and HDMI.
>>
>> Some of that is my own hope coming through, so please slap me back
>> into reality if needed!
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> Jason, Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you
>>> say that it makes sense to move toward on connector for all digital
>>> video but what about consumers who have invested millions of dollars
>>> (collectively) in audio and video equipped with HDMI, what happens
>>> to them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we go again, the article in the
>>> link states that "the display port Video signal is not compatible
>>> with DVI or HDMI". The article further states that there is yet
>>> another competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This just boggles the
>>> mind. Not the fact that there are competing technologies but the
>>> fact that it seems that no one is willing to settle on a long term
>>> standard. I know that a lot of this is driven by the computer side
>>> but as I've said on more than one occasion, consumers grasp the
>>> concept of bigger, better, faster with cell phone and computer
>>> technology, but with price points of 2.5k and up that is a difficult
>>> concept when it comes to televisions. Just my two cents. Thanks
>>> again for the info.
>>>
>>> Anthony R.
>>> Orlando, FL
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
>>> To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
>>> Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace
>>> HDMI, as well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes
>>> sense to move toward one connector for all digital video -
>>> especially if it is "pin compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.
>>>
>>> Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort
>>>
>>> I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki it"!
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>>>
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly
>>>> provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The
>>>> Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the journalist
>>>> was making suggestions of what to purchase and what to wait on
>>>> purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on the purchase of
>>>> either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested that it was quite
>>>> possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI interface in
>>>> favor of something else, although he did not mention what the
>>>> alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that
>>>> effect? That would certainly turn things upside down. Any
>>>> comments one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Anthony R.
>>>> Orlando, FL
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#10
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I think I read somewhere that the royalty fee for HDMI is like 4 cents
per unit. I, as a consumer, am willing to absorb that in order to have
one less wire behind my TV. But maybe that's just me.

Keep in mind I know NOTHING about DisplayPort, and am quite likely
making some LARGE assumptions to what it is (and isn't). Just an
end-user speaking here...

Shane Sturgeon


Jason Burroughs wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Oh I left that part out completely. HDMI is owned by HDMI, LLC and
> charges royalty fees (like many technologies). DisplayPort is an
> industry standard that does not involve much, if any, proprietary
> company information (although Philips developed an optional encryption
> method). I think that is a key differentiator. Also, the connector
> locks into place like Ethernet, and is keyed for easier insertion.
> It's been touted as "hdmi for computers" by some.
>
> Jason
>
> Shane Sturgeon wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> compared with VGA and DVI, Agreed. But what about vs. HDMI? Do we
>> really need another connection type? What does it get me that HDMI
>> 1.3 can't?
>>
>> Shane Sturgeon
>>
>>
>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> Anthony, I'm also very interested in Rodolfo's comments after CES,
>>> but I personally see DisplayPort as more than just another short
>>> term standard. The venerable VGA cable has been present on
>>> monitors/computers for probably 20 years, and with improvements in
>>> the software, has kept the same form factor from 640x480 all the way
>>> up to 1920x1080. DVI was a non-encrypted digital interface that
>>> really wasn't up to the task of being the next generation interface,
>>> but served to help LCD monitors overthrow CRT displays. Now that
>>> acceptable encryption is here, and many displays go beyond DVI's
>>> 1920x1080 limit (correct me if I'm wrong, but "dual link DVI" is
>>> required beyond 1920x1080/60), we must have something that can
>>> address the multitude of higher res displays, compatibility with
>>> protected content such as HD DVD and Blu-Ray, and better support for
>>> multiple displays. Because we are moving from one digital format to
>>> another, the "transition" should be MUCH less painful, as it's easy
>>> to convert from one software protocol to another, when compared to
>>> converted analog to digital and digital to analog. Any major issues
>>> the come up will likely be more on the software side than hardware -
>>> as in, this DVI monitor doesn't support HDCP, so I can't connect
>>> anything with protected content to it. If there's a DisplayPort
>>> monitor and a DVI computer (for example), there will likely be a
>>> 'dongle' cable that will convert from one to the other. The same
>>> thing should go for an HDMI television with a DisplayPort cable box
>>> (for example). Again, as long as they support the same software
>>> protocols like HDCP, etc., they should be just as compatible as DVI
>>> and HDMI.
>>>
>>> Some of that is my own hope coming through, so please slap me back
>>> into reality if needed!
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> Jason, Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you
>>>> say that it makes sense to move toward on connector for all digital
>>>> video but what about consumers who have invested millions of
>>>> dollars (collectively) in audio and video equipped with HDMI, what
>>>> happens to them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we go again, the article
>>>> in the link states that "the display port Video signal is not
>>>> compatible with DVI or HDMI". The article further states that
>>>> there is yet another competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This just
>>>> boggles the mind. Not the fact that there are competing
>>>> technologies but the fact that it seems that no one is willing to
>>>> settle on a long term standard. I know that a lot of this is
>>>> driven by the computer side but as I've said on more than one
>>>> occasion, consumers grasp the concept of bigger, better, faster
>>>> with cell phone and computer technology, but with price points of
>>>> 2.5k and up that is a difficult concept when it comes to
>>>> televisions. Just my two cents. Thanks again for the info.
>>>>
>>>> Anthony R.
>>>> Orlando, FL
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>> From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
>>>> To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace
>>>> HDMI, as well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes
>>>> sense to move toward one connector for all digital video -
>>>> especially if it is "pin compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.
>>>>
>>>> Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort
>>>>
>>>> I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki
>>>> it"!
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>
>>>>> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly
>>>>> provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The
>>>>> Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the journalist
>>>>> was making suggestions of what to purchase and what to wait on
>>>>> purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on the purchase
>>>>> of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested that it was quite
>>>>> possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI interface in
>>>>> favor of something else, although he did not mention what the
>>>>> alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry to that
>>>>> effect? That would certainly turn things upside down. Any
>>>>> comments one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony R.
>>>>> Orlando, FL
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#11
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

plus $10,000 per year! I still maintain I want to spend < $20 for a 6
foot digital cable, just like i do with ethernet, fibre channel, or
fiber optic cables. The only way we get there is having a million
companies making the cables for a few bucks apiece.

Everything you ever wanted to know, and then some:

http://www.edn.com/article/CA6402885.html

Jason



Shane Sturgeon wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> I think I read somewhere that the royalty fee for HDMI is like 4 cents
> per unit. I, as a consumer, am willing to absorb that in order to have
> one less wire behind my TV. But maybe that's just me.
>
> Keep in mind I know NOTHING about DisplayPort, and am quite likely
> making some LARGE assumptions to what it is (and isn't). Just an
> end-user speaking here...
>
> Shane Sturgeon
>
>
> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Oh I left that part out completely. HDMI is owned by HDMI, LLC and
>> charges royalty fees (like many technologies). DisplayPort is an
>> industry standard that does not involve much, if any, proprietary
>> company information (although Philips developed an optional
>> encryption method). I think that is a key differentiator. Also, the
>> connector locks into place like Ethernet, and is keyed for easier
>> insertion. It's been touted as "hdmi for computers" by some.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> Shane Sturgeon wrote:
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> compared with VGA and DVI, Agreed. But what about vs. HDMI? Do we
>>> really need another connection type? What does it get me that HDMI
>>> 1.3 can't?
>>>
>>> Shane Sturgeon
>>>
>>>
>>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> Anthony, I'm also very interested in Rodolfo's comments after CES,
>>>> but I personally see DisplayPort as more than just another short
>>>> term standard. The venerable VGA cable has been present on
>>>> monitors/computers for probably 20 years, and with improvements in
>>>> the software, has kept the same form factor from 640x480 all the
>>>> way up to 1920x1080. DVI was a non-encrypted digital interface that
>>>> really wasn't up to the task of being the next generation
>>>> interface, but served to help LCD monitors overthrow CRT displays.
>>>> Now that acceptable encryption is here, and many displays go beyond
>>>> DVI's 1920x1080 limit (correct me if I'm wrong, but "dual link DVI"
>>>> is required beyond 1920x1080/60), we must have something that can
>>>> address the multitude of higher res displays, compatibility with
>>>> protected content such as HD DVD and Blu-Ray, and better support
>>>> for multiple displays. Because we are moving from one digital
>>>> format to another, the "transition" should be MUCH less painful, as
>>>> it's easy to convert from one software protocol to another, when
>>>> compared to converted analog to digital and digital to analog. Any
>>>> major issues the come up will likely be more on the software side
>>>> than hardware - as in, this DVI monitor doesn't support HDCP, so I
>>>> can't connect anything with protected content to it. If there's a
>>>> DisplayPort monitor and a DVI computer (for example), there will
>>>> likely be a 'dongle' cable that will convert from one to the other.
>>>> The same thing should go for an HDMI television with a DisplayPort
>>>> cable box (for example). Again, as long as they support the same
>>>> software protocols like HDCP, etc., they should be just as
>>>> compatible as DVI and HDMI.
>>>>
>>>> Some of that is my own hope coming through, so please slap me back
>>>> into reality if needed!
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason, Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you
>>>>> say that it makes sense to move toward on connector for all
>>>>> digital video but what about consumers who have invested millions
>>>>> of dollars (collectively) in audio and video equipped with HDMI,
>>>>> what happens to them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we go again, the
>>>>> article in the link states that "the display port Video signal is
>>>>> not compatible with DVI or HDMI". The article further states that
>>>>> there is yet another competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This just
>>>>> boggles the mind. Not the fact that there are competing
>>>>> technologies but the fact that it seems that no one is willing to
>>>>> settle on a long term standard. I know that a lot of this is
>>>>> driven by the computer side but as I've said on more than one
>>>>> occasion, consumers grasp the concept of bigger, better, faster
>>>>> with cell phone and computer technology, but with price points of
>>>>> 2.5k and up that is a difficult concept when it comes to
>>>>> televisions. Just my two cents. Thanks again for the info.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony R.
>>>>> Orlando, FL
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>> From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace
>>>>> HDMI, as well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes
>>>>> sense to move toward one connector for all digital video -
>>>>> especially if it is "pin compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort
>>>>>
>>>>> I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say "wiki
>>>>> it"!
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly
>>>>>> provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The
>>>>>> Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the
>>>>>> journalist was making suggestions of what to purchase and what to
>>>>>> wait on purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on the
>>>>>> purchase of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested that it
>>>>>> was quite possible that HD manufacturers might abandon the HDMI
>>>>>> interface in favor of something else, although he did not mention
>>>>>> what the alternative might be. Are there rumors in the industry
>>>>>> to that effect? That would certainly turn things upside down.
>>>>>> Any comments one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anthony R.
>>>>>> Orlando, FL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#12
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

right, I thought you were just talking about royalties, not license
cost. $10k/year is nothing compared to 4 cents per unit ... for most
manufacturers. Ship 250,000 units per year and it averages to 5 cents
per unit total ... still workable, yes?

I will read your link in the morning ... must get some rest.

Shane Sturgeon


Jason Burroughs wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> plus $10,000 per year! I still maintain I want to spend < $20 for a 6
> foot digital cable, just like i do with ethernet, fibre channel, or
> fiber optic cables. The only way we get there is having a million
> companies making the cables for a few bucks apiece.
>
> Everything you ever wanted to know, and then some:
>
> http://www.edn.com/article/CA6402885.html
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> Shane Sturgeon wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> I think I read somewhere that the royalty fee for HDMI is like 4
>> cents per unit. I, as a consumer, am willing to absorb that in order
>> to have one less wire behind my TV. But maybe that's just me.
>>
>> Keep in mind I know NOTHING about DisplayPort, and am quite likely
>> making some LARGE assumptions to what it is (and isn't). Just an
>> end-user speaking here...
>>
>> Shane Sturgeon
>>
>>
>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> Oh I left that part out completely. HDMI is owned by HDMI, LLC and
>>> charges royalty fees (like many technologies). DisplayPort is an
>>> industry standard that does not involve much, if any, proprietary
>>> company information (although Philips developed an optional
>>> encryption method). I think that is a key differentiator. Also, the
>>> connector locks into place like Ethernet, and is keyed for easier
>>> insertion. It's been touted as "hdmi for computers" by some.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> Shane Sturgeon wrote:
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> compared with VGA and DVI, Agreed. But what about vs. HDMI? Do we
>>>> really need another connection type? What does it get me that HDMI
>>>> 1.3 can't?
>>>>
>>>> Shane Sturgeon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony, I'm also very interested in Rodolfo's comments after CES,
>>>>> but I personally see DisplayPort as more than just another short
>>>>> term standard. The venerable VGA cable has been present on
>>>>> monitors/computers for probably 20 years, and with improvements in
>>>>> the software, has kept the same form factor from 640x480 all the
>>>>> way up to 1920x1080. DVI was a non-encrypted digital interface
>>>>> that really wasn't up to the task of being the next generation
>>>>> interface, but served to help LCD monitors overthrow CRT displays.
>>>>> Now that acceptable encryption is here, and many displays go
>>>>> beyond DVI's 1920x1080 limit (correct me if I'm wrong, but "dual
>>>>> link DVI" is required beyond 1920x1080/60), we must have something
>>>>> that can address the multitude of higher res displays,
>>>>> compatibility with protected content such as HD DVD and Blu-Ray,
>>>>> and better support for multiple displays. Because we are moving
>>>>> from one digital format to another, the "transition" should be
>>>>> MUCH less painful, as it's easy to convert from one software
>>>>> protocol to another, when compared to converted analog to digital
>>>>> and digital to analog. Any major issues the come up will likely be
>>>>> more on the software side than hardware - as in, this DVI monitor
>>>>> doesn't support HDCP, so I can't connect anything with protected
>>>>> content to it. If there's a DisplayPort monitor and a DVI computer
>>>>> (for example), there will likely be a 'dongle' cable that will
>>>>> convert from one to the other. The same thing should go for an
>>>>> HDMI television with a DisplayPort cable box (for example). Again,
>>>>> as long as they support the same software protocols like HDCP,
>>>>> etc., they should be just as compatible as DVI and HDMI.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of that is my own hope coming through, so please slap me back
>>>>> into reality if needed!
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason, Thanks for the link. You are absolutely correct when you
>>>>>> say that it makes sense to move toward on connector for all
>>>>>> digital video but what about consumers who have invested millions
>>>>>> of dollars (collectively) in audio and video equipped with HDMI,
>>>>>> what happens to them? (Rhetorical) Also, here we go again, the
>>>>>> article in the link states that "the display port Video signal is
>>>>>> not compatible with DVI or HDMI". The article further states
>>>>>> that there is yet another competitor in the pipeline, UDI? This
>>>>>> just boggles the mind. Not the fact that there are competing
>>>>>> technologies but the fact that it seems that no one is willing to
>>>>>> settle on a long term standard. I know that a lot of this is
>>>>>> driven by the computer side but as I've said on more than one
>>>>>> occasion, consumers grasp the concept of bigger, better, faster
>>>>>> with cell phone and computer technology, but with price points of
>>>>>> 2.5k and up that is a difficult concept when it comes to
>>>>>> televisions. Just my two cents. Thanks again for the info.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anthony R.
>>>>>> Orlando, FL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>>> From: Jason Burroughs <[email protected]>
>>>>>> To: HDTV Magazine <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:54:24 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: HDMI replaced? USA Today ariticle of last Thursday
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anthony, it's called DisplayPort, and it may eventually replace
>>>>>> HDMI, as well as the interface between PCs and monitors. It makes
>>>>>> sense to move toward one connector for all digital video -
>>>>>> especially if it is "pin compatible" like DVI and HDMI are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I used to tell people "google for it", but now i usually say
>>>>>> "wiki it"!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anthony Rizzuto wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was in Boston last week and the hotel I was staying at kindly
>>>>>>> provided a complimentary copy of USA Today to the guests. The
>>>>>>> Thursday edition had on article on the CES in which the
>>>>>>> journalist was making suggestions of what to purchase and what
>>>>>>> to wait on purchasing. In the article he mentioned waiting on
>>>>>>> the purchase of either Blu-Ray or HDDVD and further suggested
>>>>>>> that it was quite possible that HD manufacturers might abandon
>>>>>>> the HDMI interface in favor of something else, although he did
>>>>>>> not mention what the alternative might be. Are there rumors in
>>>>>>> the industry to that effect? That would certainly turn things
>>>>>>> upside down. Any comments one way or the other would be greatly
>>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anthony R.
>>>>>>> Orlando, FL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]