Lost among Choices

Started by rwbrobertwadebrown Dec 27, 2007 42 posts
Read-only archive
#1
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

12/27/2007 2:59pm ct

I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
to explain.

I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma

Is this because I'm used to CRT ?

I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
50" 1080p Plasma HDTV

Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.

Advice please.
Best,
Robert B

4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
903-792-2022



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#2
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

1. My F38310 was "blown" about a year ago and I had it repaired. The
service person removed the main board and took it to his shop. The charge
was about $125 for labor and $10 for parts.
2. I recently moved it to the rec room and replaced it with a 55" Sony rear
projection LCos. It is a great picture for the money. Drawback is off
angle viewing.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Wade Brown" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:36 PM
Subject: Lost among Choices


> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT tube)
> which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet to
> explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to replace
> it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084 50"
> 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p and HDMI
> 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#3
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Robert,

True it is what Fred says....but be careful.

Sony just announced on December 20th that it will no longer manufacture its
fabulous SXRD RPTV sets, and will movr to LCD since that's what the public
wants.

Convenience over quality....again.

I'm kinda stuck now myself in trying to decide what to get for my great room


Mike Malkin

-------Original Message-------

From: Fred Cotton
Date: 12/27/2007 4:08:17 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

1. My F38310 was "blown" about a year ago and I had it repaired. The
service person removed the main board and took it to his shop. The charge
was about $125 for labor and $10 for parts.
2. I recently moved it to the rec room and replaced it with a 55" Sony rear
projection LCos. It is a great picture for the money. Drawback is off
angle viewing.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Wade Brown" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:36 PM
Subject: Lost among Choices


> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT tube)
> which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet to
> explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to replace
> it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084 50"
> 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p and HDMI
> 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same

> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]
.


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#4
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Robert,

1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
anything of that loss.

2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
would check their policy as well.

3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times the
main issue of disappointment.

4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would not
do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal itself
you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
half resolution the HD images look pristine.

5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).

6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure you
evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like) on
color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see pixel
structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of analog
CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that issue
with time.

7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic (in
that order), but since you are looking for a good price without compromising
quality I would consider a Vizio panel.

8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in price
quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
you.

9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern with
the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not have
a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video processing,
XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can display
the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it won't.

10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than the
barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks in
my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).

11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you had
was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while they
are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs, you
do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.

I hope this helps Robert.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

12/27/2007 2:59pm ct

I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
to explain.

I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma

Is this because I'm used to CRT ?

I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
50" 1080p Plasma HDTV

Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.

Advice please.
Best,
Robert B

4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
903-792-2022



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#5
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails

Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Robert,
>
> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> anything of that loss.
>
> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> would check their policy as well.
>
> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times the
> main issue of disappointment.
>
> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would not
> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal itself
> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>
> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>
> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure you
> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like) on
> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see pixel
> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of analog
> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that issue
> with time.
>
> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic (in
> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without compromising
> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>
> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in price
> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> you.
>
> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern with
> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not have
> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video processing,
> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can display
> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it won't.
>
> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than the
> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks in
> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>
> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you had
> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while they
> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs, you
> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>
> I hope this helps Robert.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> to explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#6
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts. That
#7
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----


As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a quick
look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.

In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless of
how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing company
decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own one
and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter how
much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
unmatched audio quality.

Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes all
over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now in
chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
similar interests of quality service.

http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory

In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.

When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert had:
"no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a set
at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.

Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation at
Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after a
low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the parts,
the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite the
opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from every
part of the industry, including retail.

Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.

Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to panels
that otherwise people could not buy:

http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php

http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml

http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml

Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.

Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in perspective,
I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he needs
to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I offer
that option, among others.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts. That's
how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If I
can find the article, I will forward.

6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
the more profitable one?

9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these differences.
Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-Fhd1
is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.

10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it. but
never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
about that.

See you guys at CES!




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Richard Fisher
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails

Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Robert,
>
> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> anything of that loss.
>
> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> would check their policy as well.
>
> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times the
> main issue of disappointment.
>
> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
not
> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
itself
> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>
> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>
> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
you
> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like) on
> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
pixel
> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
analog
> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
issue
> with time.
>
> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
(in
> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
compromising
> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>
> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
price
> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> you.
>
> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
with
> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
have
> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
processing,
> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
display
> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
won't.
>
> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than the
> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
in
> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>
> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you had
> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
they
> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
you
> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>
> I hope this helps Robert.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> to explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#8
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107

Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk and
not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do much
to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king? Fujitsu
is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
state of the art.

Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores rather
than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and service
for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
with better performance.

Why even buy poor performance?




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----


As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a quick
look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.

In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless of
how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing company
decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own one
and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter how
much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
unmatched audio quality.

Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes all
over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now in
chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
similar interests of quality service.

http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory

In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.

When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert had:
"no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a set
at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.

Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation at
Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after a
low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the parts,
the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite the
opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from every
part of the industry, including retail.

Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.

Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to panels
that otherwise people could not buy:

http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php

http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml

http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml

Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.

Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in perspective,
I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he needs
to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I offer
that option, among others.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts. That's
how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If I
can find the article, I will forward.

6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
the more profitable one?

9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these differences.
Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-Fhd1
is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.

10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it. but
never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
about that.

See you guys at CES!




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Richard Fisher
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails

Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Robert,
>
> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> anything of that loss.
>
> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> would check their policy as well.
>
> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times the
> main issue of disappointment.
>
> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
not
> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
itself
> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>
> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>
> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
you
> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like) on
> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
pixel
> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
analog
> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
issue
> with time.
>
> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
(in
> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
compromising
> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>
> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
price
> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> you.
>
> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
with
> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
have
> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
processing,
> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
display
> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
won't.
>
> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than the
> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
in
> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>
> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you had
> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
they
> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
you
> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>
> I hope this helps Robert.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> to explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#9
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

The conspiracy theories are getting a little ahead of themselves. While I
don't disagree with your quality concerns over lesser known brands,
suggestions of counterfeiting parts are getting out there. If anyone can
provide me with an example of a video chip that has been reverse engineered
or "counterfeited" via some other means, I would be amazed as I don't
believe that is technically possible.

Keep in mind that all manufacturers have some sort of failure rate. Even the
linked blog includes several references to just that as well as corrections
for misinformation about warranty claims for larger sets on the lesser
brands.

Anybody remember Goldstar products? I do. I considered them junk. They are
now known as LG Electronics and I would say some of their stuff today is
pretty darn good. So are Vizio, Oleivia and the like going through the same
growing pains that Goldstar once did?

BTW, you'll find that many of the off brand sets go down the assembly lines
in the same factories as the big name brands. Find out for yourself who
makes Insignia. The world runs on contract manufacturing these days.

The reality is Sony's move is a business decision, all about the bottom
line. As video/audiophiles, don't let your wishes and informed perspectives
blind you to thinking better quality first and foremost in the Board room.
Do those Execs make a product line decision that caters to the videophile
and sell 100k units or does he gamble with a lesser quality product with a
lower price point that sells to a million Joe Sixpacks? The decisions are no
mystery when you put them in those terms.

Bob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
> That's
> how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
> There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
> another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
> work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If
> I
> can find the article, I will forward.
>
> 6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
> Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
> the more profitable one?
>
> 9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
> differences.
> Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-
> Fhd1
> is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
>
> 10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
> better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
> but
> never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
> about that.
>
> See you guys at CES!
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Richard Fisher
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
>
> Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
> seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
>
> Richard Fisher
> ISF and HAA certified
> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> > anything of that loss.
> >
> > 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> > would check their policy as well.
> >
> > 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> > competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> > there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> > notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
> the
> > main issue of disappointment.
> >
> > 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> > lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> > introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
> not
> > do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
> itself
> > you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> > well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> > half resolution the HD images look pristine.
> >
> > 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> > 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
> >
> > 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
> you
> > evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of
> image
> > setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
> on
> > color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> > material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
> pixel
> > structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
> analog
> > CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
> issue
> > with time.
> >
> > 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
> (in
> > that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
> compromising
> > quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
> >
> > 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
> price
> > quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the
> market
> > for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> > you.
> >
> > 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
> with
> > the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
> have
> > a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> > probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
> processing,
> > XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> > words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
> display
> > the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
> won't.
> >
> > 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
> the
> > barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps
> you
> > should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
> in
> > my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
> >
> > 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
> had
> > was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
> they
> > are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the
> best
> > price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
> you
> > do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> > research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
> >
> > I hope this helps Robert.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> > Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
> >
> > I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> > tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> > to explain.
> >
> > I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> > replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> > Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> > LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
> >
> > Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
> >
> > I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> > 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
> >
> > Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> > and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
> >
> > Advice please.
> > Best,
> > Robert B
> >
> > 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> > 903-792-2022
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same
> day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#10
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,

Aren't you a high end audio-video retailer, or do I have you confused with
another of our long time Tips members?

As a person who has been around this industry for a long time, I would be
inclined to believe what you say about Vizio.....except that I probably
couldn't purchase a Vizio at your store, could I?

I'm just an end user whose first HDTV was a Hitachi RPT, and who presently
owns a Sony SXRD (XBR 1). I like quality that I can afford. Is it just
possible that there are a lot of people out here who can't afford high end
stuff and jump at the chance to pay under $2K for a 60" Vizio plasma at
Sam's or similar outlet? Won't Vizio go out of business if they sell a lot
of junk? Won't they face a lot of lawsuits for selling junk?

I mean no disrespect.

Jack


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Azar" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices


> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107
>
> Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk and
> not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do
> much
> to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king?
> Fujitsu
> is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
> state of the art.
>
> Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores
> rather
> than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and
> service
> for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
> costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
> with better performance.
>
> Why even buy poor performance?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>
> As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
> bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
> with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a quick
> look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.
>
> In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless of
> how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing
> company
> decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own
> one
> and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter how
> much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
> unmatched audio quality.
>
> Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes all
> over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now in
> chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
> similar interests of quality service.
>
> http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory
>
> In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
> consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
> only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.
>
> When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert had:
> "no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a set
> at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.
>
> Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation
> at
> Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after a
> low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
> Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the
> parts,
> the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite
> the
> opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from every
> part of the industry, including retail.
>
> Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.
>
> Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to panels
> that otherwise people could not buy:
>
> http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php
>
> http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml
>
> http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml
>
> Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
> person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.
>
> Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
> Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in
> perspective,
> I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he
> needs
> to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I
> offer
> that option, among others.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
> That's
> how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
> There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
> another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
> work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If
> I
> can find the article, I will forward.
>
> 6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
> Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
> the more profitable one?
>
> 9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
> differences.
> Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the
> Pro-Fhd1
> is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
>
> 10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
> better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
> but
> never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
> about that.
>
> See you guys at CES!
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Richard Fisher
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
>
> Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
> seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
>
> Richard Fisher
> ISF and HAA certified
> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Robert,
>>
>> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
>> anything of that loss.
>>
>> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
>> would check their policy as well.
>>
>> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
>> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
>> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
>> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
>> the
>> main issue of disappointment.
>>
>> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
>> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
>> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
> not
>> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
> itself
>> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
>> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
>> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>>
>> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
>> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>>
>> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
> you
>> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
>> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
>> on
>> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
>> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
> pixel
>> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
> analog
>> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
> issue
>> with time.
>>
>> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
> (in
>> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
> compromising
>> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>>
>> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
> price
>> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
>> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
>> you.
>>
>> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
> with
>> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
> have
>> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
>> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
> processing,
>> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
>> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
> display
>> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
> won't.
>>
>> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
>> the
>> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
>> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
> in
>> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>>
>> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
>> had
>> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
> they
>> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
>> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
> you
>> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
>> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>>
>> I hope this helps Robert.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rodolfo La Maestra
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
>> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
>> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>> Subject: Lost among Choices
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>>
>> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
>> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
>> to explain.
>>
>> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
>> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
>> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
>> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>>
>> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>>
>> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
>> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>>
>> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
>> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>>
>> Advice please.
>> Best,
>> Robert B
>>
>> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
>> 903-792-2022
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#11
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,

I understand your valid concern.

When VHS was preferred was not for quality either, when LCD was preferred
was not for quality either. Massive amounts of people buy those, and many
of those do not even care for your store type.

That wheel is running since hi-fi was invented and the Internet and Costco
type shifted the savings with lower prices to the buyer, not to the salesman
that in most cases is poorly informed, and have done nothing other than
pointing to a floor sample they do not even know or properly calibrate for
proper presentation and comparison.

Many times I go to hi and low end stores to listen to the gross errors and
misinformation their ignorance fills consumers heads, then I take those
consumers to the side, present myself, and give them true knowledge, free.

Your store might be different, but I could not find one in ten years of HDTV
that really knew well the technology and the products, I make them pass all
kinds of tests, and 99% of them fail, and with a face of confidence.

That is the state of business.

You have not provided a source for the Vizio "junk" issue, other than the
article that talks about warranties for tier levels. Those will always
exist. Out of warranty tier 1 also makes people pay for all the expenses,
and they are not cheap, so this is pay now or pay later, and most prefer the
"pay-later" chance because they might be lucky and actually "pay-never", and
the money is in their pocket since day one.

When a plasma sells for hundreds to a $1000 less on Costco or the Internet
than in the brick and mortar uninformed place, that by itself pays for many
many years of extended warranty if that is the buyer's concern.
Joe-six-pack has the choice to buy the warranty with that saving or use the
money for a whole surround system, cabinets, etc.

In other words, how to spend the saving is on the consumer control, not as
an inaccessible commission in the salesmen pocket that no even know the
products they sell; and those are not only the BB and CC type, but also hi
end places that charge full MSRP and believe they are the Queen of HDTV.

The way I see it is simple, the value added service/knowledge a good store
can give to a consumer has become now too expensive by current standards
compared to alternative markets anyone has access to, which means that
survival without knowledge and sensitive overhead cost could not be
possible.

Look at it from another angle, if an informed consumer gets into those
stores, ignores the uninformed salesmen, points to a product and just signs
the check and leave, the store does not pass the value of the not provided
effort as a saving to the consumer, maybe they should start to do that in a
flexible way at the moment of negotiating the sale.

So it comes to "who controls the savings", and consumers will always try to
control the savings, especially when they are large, they have done the
research already, and the store has done nothing regarding advice, even when
they know that a Vizio is inferior to a Panasonic.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:39 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107

Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk and
not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do much
to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king? Fujitsu
is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
state of the art.

Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores rather
than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and service
for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
with better performance.

Why even buy poor performance?




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----


As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a quick
look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.

In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless of
how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing company
decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own one
and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter how
much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
unmatched audio quality.

Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes all
over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now in
chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
similar interests of quality service.

http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory

In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.

When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert had:
"no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a set
at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.

Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation at
Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after a
low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the parts,
the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite the
opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from every
part of the industry, including retail.

Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.

Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to panels
that otherwise people could not buy:

http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php

http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml

http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml

Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.

Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in perspective,
I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he needs
to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I offer
that option, among others.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts. That's
how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If I
can find the article, I will forward.

6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
the more profitable one?

9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these differences.
Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-Fhd1
is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.

10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it. but
never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
about that.

See you guys at CES!




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Richard Fisher
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails

Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Robert,
>
> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> anything of that loss.
>
> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> would check their policy as well.
>
> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times the
> main issue of disappointment.
>
> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
not
> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
itself
> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>
> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>
> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
you
> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like) on
> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
pixel
> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
analog
> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
issue
> with time.
>
> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
(in
> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
compromising
> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>
> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
price
> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> you.
>
> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
with
> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
have
> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
processing,
> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
display
> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
won't.
>
> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than the
> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
in
> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>
> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you had
> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
they
> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
you
> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>
> I hope this helps Robert.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> to explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#12
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Bob,

I have the article somewhere, an engineering mag that showed chips
repackaged as another. If I find it and a link, I will send it, but it
surprised me to see this.



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Bob Mankin
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 11:57 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

The conspiracy theories are getting a little ahead of themselves. While I
don't disagree with your quality concerns over lesser known brands,
suggestions of counterfeiting parts are getting out there. If anyone can
provide me with an example of a video chip that has been reverse engineered
or "counterfeited" via some other means, I would be amazed as I don't
believe that is technically possible.

Keep in mind that all manufacturers have some sort of failure rate. Even the
linked blog includes several references to just that as well as corrections
for misinformation about warranty claims for larger sets on the lesser
brands.

Anybody remember Goldstar products? I do. I considered them junk. They are
now known as LG Electronics and I would say some of their stuff today is
pretty darn good. So are Vizio, Oleivia and the like going through the same
growing pains that Goldstar once did?

BTW, you'll find that many of the off brand sets go down the assembly lines
in the same factories as the big name brands. Find out for yourself who
makes Insignia. The world runs on contract manufacturing these days.

The reality is Sony's move is a business decision, all about the bottom
line. As video/audiophiles, don't let your wishes and informed perspectives
blind you to thinking better quality first and foremost in the Board room.
Do those Execs make a product line decision that caters to the videophile
and sell 100k units or does he gamble with a lesser quality product with a
lower price point that sells to a million Joe Sixpacks? The decisions are no
mystery when you put them in those terms.

Bob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
> That's
> how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
> There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
> another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
> work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If
> I
> can find the article, I will forward.
>
> 6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
> Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
> the more profitable one?
>
> 9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
> differences.
> Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-
> Fhd1
> is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
>
> 10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
> better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
> but
> never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
> about that.
>
> See you guys at CES!
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Richard Fisher
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
>
> Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
> seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
>
> Richard Fisher
> ISF and HAA certified
> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> > anything of that loss.
> >
> > 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> > would check their policy as well.
> >
> > 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> > competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> > there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> > notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
> the
> > main issue of disappointment.
> >
> > 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> > lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> > introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
> not
> > do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
> itself
> > you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> > well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> > half resolution the HD images look pristine.
> >
> > 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> > 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
> >
> > 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
> you
> > evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of
> image
> > setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
> on
> > color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> > material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
> pixel
> > structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
> analog
> > CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
> issue
> > with time.
> >
> > 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
> (in
> > that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
> compromising
> > quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
> >
> > 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
> price
> > quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the
> market
> > for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> > you.
> >
> > 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
> with
> > the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
> have
> > a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> > probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
> processing,
> > XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> > words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
> display
> > the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
> won't.
> >
> > 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
> the
> > barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps
> you
> > should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
> in
> > my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
> >
> > 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
> had
> > was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
> they
> > are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the
> best
> > price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
> you
> > do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> > research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
> >
> > I hope this helps Robert.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> > Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
> >
> > I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> > tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> > to explain.
> >
> > I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> > replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> > Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> > LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
> >
> > Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
> >
> > I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> > 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
> >
> > Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> > and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
> >
> > Advice please.
> > Best,
> > Robert B
> >
> > 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> > 903-792-2022
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same
> day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#13
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Yes, mid and some upper end, though not as much upper nor as high as in the
past. That part of the market has shrunk some.

No, why would I sell Vizio when a Panny can be had for just a little more?

If size is the only thing, not quality, Chevy station wagons should outsell
Porsche 100 to 1. But the average person at a BB or CC thinks size, not
quality as no one there knows quality. As long as junk does not cause any
damages, no on biz or lawsuits.

As PT Barnum supposedly said, no one went out of business underestimating
the American public.



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Fr Jack
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:36 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,

Aren't you a high end audio-video retailer, or do I have you confused with
another of our long time Tips members?

As a person who has been around this industry for a long time, I would be
inclined to believe what you say about Vizio.....except that I probably
couldn't purchase a Vizio at your store, could I?

I'm just an end user whose first HDTV was a Hitachi RPT, and who presently
owns a Sony SXRD (XBR 1). I like quality that I can afford. Is it just
possible that there are a lot of people out here who can't afford high end
stuff and jump at the chance to pay under $2K for a 60" Vizio plasma at
Sam's or similar outlet? Won't Vizio go out of business if they sell a lot
of junk? Won't they face a lot of lawsuits for selling junk?

I mean no disrespect.

Jack


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Azar" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices


> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107
>
> Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk and
> not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do
> much
> to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king?
> Fujitsu
> is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
> state of the art.
>
> Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores
> rather
> than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and
> service
> for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
> costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
> with better performance.
>
> Why even buy poor performance?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>
> As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
> bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
> with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a quick
> look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.
>
> In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless of
> how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing
> company
> decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own
> one
> and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter how
> much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
> unmatched audio quality.
>
> Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes all
> over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now in
> chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
> similar interests of quality service.
>
> http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory
>
> In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
> consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
> only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.
>
> When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert had:
> "no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a set
> at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.
>
> Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation
> at
> Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after a
> low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
> Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the
> parts,
> the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite
> the
> opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from every
> part of the industry, including retail.
>
> Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.
>
> Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to panels
> that otherwise people could not buy:
>
> http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php
>
> http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml
>
> http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml
>
> Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
> person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.
>
> Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
> Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in
> perspective,
> I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he
> needs
> to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I
> offer
> that option, among others.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
> That's
> how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
> There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
> another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
> work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If
> I
> can find the article, I will forward.
>
> 6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
> Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
> the more profitable one?
>
> 9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
> differences.
> Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the
> Pro-Fhd1
> is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
>
> 10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
> better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
> but
> never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
> about that.
>
> See you guys at CES!
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Richard Fisher
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
>
> Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
> seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
>
> Richard Fisher
> ISF and HAA certified
> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Robert,
>>
>> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
>> anything of that loss.
>>
>> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
>> would check their policy as well.
>>
>> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
>> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
>> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
>> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
>> the
>> main issue of disappointment.
>>
>> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
>> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
>> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
> not
>> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
> itself
>> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
>> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
>> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>>
>> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
>> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>>
>> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
> you
>> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
>> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
>> on
>> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
>> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
> pixel
>> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
> analog
>> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
> issue
>> with time.
>>
>> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
> (in
>> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
> compromising
>> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>>
>> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
> price
>> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
>> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
>> you.
>>
>> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
> with
>> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
> have
>> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
>> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
> processing,
>> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
>> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
> display
>> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
> won't.
>>
>> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
>> the
>> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
>> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
> in
>> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>>
>> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
>> had
>> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
> they
>> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
>> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
> you
>> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
>> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>>
>> I hope this helps Robert.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rodolfo La Maestra
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
>> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
>> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>> Subject: Lost among Choices
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>>
>> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
>> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
>> to explain.
>>
>> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
>> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
>> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
>> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>>
>> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>>
>> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
>> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>>
>> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
>> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>>
>> Advice please.
>> Best,
>> Robert B
>>
>> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
>> 903-792-2022
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same

> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#14
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

The Joe you're thinking about here, I am not Joe Azar.
#15
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Damn, where is that queen? Is it a real female, or just a drag one? When you
find the queen around here, parade that sucker by, Rodolfo. In the meantime,
your son and I can check out the ones in LV!

My local repair company informs me of good vs. junk stuff, gear they will
take, gear they would rather not, and gear that I can just go throw in the
river as they never want to see it. That article came from them, and they
are quite competent, ISF, and old timers in the biz.

Unfortunately, it is hard to know all about all video. Even you struggle to
know whats what. We try at my store and do a satisfactory job, even though
half of us are really stereo music lovers and can give you a real ear
education. I may even give you a turntable ed if I can ever find time to sit
down and write the course material.

Surprise! We sell Panny and Pioneer for the same, or less than the big guys.
Yep. You heard right. The 5000ex and pro hd1 we sell for $2999. We sell the
1080 50" Kuro for $500 or more less than BB. We do not get rich like this,
but make a decent profit, yet more importantly, take care of our customers.
I allow calls to my mobile up to midnight, and even had one Thanksgiving
that I solved via phone. But it was a national emergency: football day!

I know the small stores like mine are disappearing rapidly, and what a
shame! However, with the housing crisis, I hear from reps the appointment
only and trunk slammers are also disappearing. I do believe that our retail
biz will again grow due to the need for somewhere to call for real info and
help. Get them all day: "I can't get my _____ to work. What do I do?"

"Yes, where did you buy it? Have you tried calling them?"

"Yes, but they can't help me. They don't seem to know."

At that point I suggest a either a service call at hourly rates, to include
our learning time on gear we do not sell, or take it back and come buy from
us at the same price for better gear.

My point is we are losing specialists in many fields, not only audio/video.
When is the last time you saw a good photo shop, one that can help you buy a
good film or electronic camera? By not patronizing craftsmen, we lose them,
and ultimately hurt ourselves. One of the big problems for high end guys is
the lack of showrooms and intelligent sales personnel for their product. The
internet serves them poorly, and you too for truly purchasing correctly.

As one customer just told one of our staff, why would I want to buy from the
internet or appointment only? I want to try it and have some one who can
help anytime after I buy it.





-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:38 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,

I understand your valid concern.

When VHS was preferred was not for quality either, when LCD was preferred
was not for quality either. Massive amounts of people buy those, and many
of those do not even care for your store type.

That wheel is running since hi-fi was invented and the Internet and Costco
type shifted the savings with lower prices to the buyer, not to the salesman
that in most cases is poorly informed, and have done nothing other than
pointing to a floor sample they do not even know or properly calibrate for
proper presentation and comparison.

Many times I go to hi and low end stores to listen to the gross errors and
misinformation their ignorance fills consumers heads, then I take those
consumers to the side, present myself, and give them true knowledge, free.

Your store might be different, but I could not find one in ten years of HDTV
that really knew well the technology and the products, I make them pass all
kinds of tests, and 99% of them fail, and with a face of confidence.

That is the state of business.

You have not provided a source for the Vizio "junk" issue, other than the
article that talks about warranties for tier levels. Those will always
exist. Out of warranty tier 1 also makes people pay for all the expenses,
and they are not cheap, so this is pay now or pay later, and most prefer the
"pay-later" chance because they might be lucky and actually "pay-never", and
the money is in their pocket since day one.

When a plasma sells for hundreds to a $1000 less on Costco or the Internet
than in the brick and mortar uninformed place, that by itself pays for many
many years of extended warranty if that is the buyer's concern.
Joe-six-pack has the choice to buy the warranty with that saving or use the
money for a whole surround system, cabinets, etc.

In other words, how to spend the saving is on the consumer control, not as
an inaccessible commission in the salesmen pocket that no even know the
products they sell; and those are not only the BB and CC type, but also hi
end places that charge full MSRP and believe they are the Queen of HDTV.

The way I see it is simple, the value added service/knowledge a good store
can give to a consumer has become now too expensive by current standards
compared to alternative markets anyone has access to, which means that
survival without knowledge and sensitive overhead cost could not be
possible.

Look at it from another angle, if an informed consumer gets into those
stores, ignores the uninformed salesmen, points to a product and just signs
the check and leave, the store does not pass the value of the not provided
effort as a saving to the consumer, maybe they should start to do that in a
flexible way at the moment of negotiating the sale.

So it comes to "who controls the savings", and consumers will always try to
control the savings, especially when they are large, they have done the
research already, and the store has done nothing regarding advice, even when
they know that a Vizio is inferior to a Panasonic.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:39 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107

Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk and
not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do much
to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king? Fujitsu
is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
state of the art.

Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores rather
than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and service
for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
with better performance.

Why even buy poor performance?




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----


As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a quick
look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.

In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless of
how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing company
decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own one
and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter how
much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
unmatched audio quality.

Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes all
over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now in
chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
similar interests of quality service.

http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory

In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.

When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert had:
"no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a set
at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.

Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation at
Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after a
low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the parts,
the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite the
opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from every
part of the industry, including retail.

Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.

Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to panels
that otherwise people could not buy:

http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php

http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml

http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml

Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.

Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in perspective,
I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he needs
to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I offer
that option, among others.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts. That's
how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If I
can find the article, I will forward.

6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
the more profitable one?

9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these differences.
Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-Fhd1
is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.

10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it. but
never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
about that.

See you guys at CES!




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Richard Fisher
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails

Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Robert,
>
> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> anything of that loss.
>
> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> would check their policy as well.
>
> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times the
> main issue of disappointment.
>
> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
not
> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
itself
> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>
> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>
> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
you
> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like) on
> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
pixel
> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
analog
> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
issue
> with time.
>
> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
(in
> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
compromising
> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>
> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
price
> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> you.
>
> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
with
> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
have
> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
processing,
> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
display
> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
won't.
>
> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than the
> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
in
> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>
> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you had
> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
they
> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
you
> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>
> I hope this helps Robert.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> to explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#16
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

1) This is where connections, longevity in business, and good mfgs. benefit
the customer. I pick my companies more carefully than they pick me, and I
make sure I know who the decision makers are to get repairs done for my
customer. That is the main reason I quit selling Sony years ago and turned
down the line again 2 months ago.

2) Spiffs, rebates, free merchandise, trips, etc. are powerful motivators to
business and sales people alike. The other side of this is the customer does
not know HD. 1080, p vs. I, NTSC, 4x3, all is foreign to them. So they buy
based on "dynamic" settings, trim, unnecessary features, store presentation,
and size and price.

3) You are right on!

As for JD Power and other satisfaction surveys, I overheard a very
interesting conversation a few days ago. The reason Lexus, BMW and other
high end vehicles get high satisfaction ratings is because the owners do not
want to say what they bought is junk, even if it was in the shop for 2
weeks. Slamming a car they spent mucho for makes them look bad, especially
one with cache. Never thought of that. The same thing may exist in TV as
these are over $1000, and TVs of yesterday were generally in the $200-800
range.



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joe Hart
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:19 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

The Joe you're thinking about here, I am not Joe Azar.
#17
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

12/29/2007 10:30am ct

Since I started this particular thread, I want to make a point.

It is not possible for even the interested HD consumer to
keep up with all the choices. It's just not possible, and have a life.

One has to immerse oneself in all the latest papers and
other inside briefings in order to keep up with the improvements and
evolution of the plethora of technologies which end up putting an HD
picture in your home.

And I don't think it's fair to expect Joe Six-Pack to
understand the subtleties.

Let's face it. There has been something close to a
conspiracy by the FCC to make sure the public was left uneducated
about digital and HD TV. The FCC dragged their feet on requiring
digital tuners be included in ALL sets since ATSC was adopted. They
didn't learn a thing from the UHF problem of the '60s. Even
traditional NTSC sets should have had mandated digital tuners
included in them by, say, 2001, so the impact of the digital
transition could have been minimized. They kept giving in to the
industry for delay, they've not mandated HD, they've botched
must-carry, and they've not written and published mandatory sales tag
information IN BIG TYPE be included on the sales literature, sales
tags and advertising of digital and HD sets. For instance, in the
last several years, how many people thought they were buying a
standard 720 or 1080 set but got lesser resolution than that? The
answer: "most". Any set not meeting the 720p and 1080i standard
should be required to include a big warning label on the
screen: "This set doesn't cut the mustard". Right now the FCC has
no practical plans for educating the public about the
transition. They've punted everything over to the
industry. Ha! Talk about the fox in the hen house! And have you
ever heard of a sillier plan than to give out coupons for digital set
top boxes to be used with NTSC sets without price controls? The
result will be a rip-off of both the public and the government. It's
as if they were trained by FEMA.

Right now, one of the biggest problems is people buying HD
and not understanding they are not going to be getting HD (on local
channels) from Dish and DirecTV, plus, being aware of the cost of an
upgrade to an HD satellite set-top-box. I don't know how many people
I've talked to who are so proud of their new HD set and don't have a
clue that they aren't watched HD. And let's don't forget the public
not being alerted to the 5:1 issues.

It's a mess.

Best,
Robert












At 01:37 AM 12/29/2007, you wrote:
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>1) This is where connections, longevity in business, and good mfgs. benefit
>the customer. I pick my companies more carefully than they pick me, and I
>make sure I know who the decision makers are to get repairs done for my
>customer. That is the main reason I quit selling Sony years ago and turned
>down the line again 2 months ago.
>
>2) Spiffs, rebates, free merchandise, trips, etc. are powerful motivators to
>business and sales people alike. The other side of this is the customer does
>not know HD. 1080, p vs. I, NTSC, 4x3, all is foreign to them. So they buy
>based on "dynamic" settings, trim, unnecessary features, store presentation,
>and size and price.
>
>3) You are right on!
>
>As for JD Power and other satisfaction surveys, I overheard a very
>interesting conversation a few days ago. The reason Lexus, BMW and other
>high end vehicles get high satisfaction ratings is because the owners do not
>want to say what they bought is junk, even if it was in the shop for 2
>weeks. Slamming a car they spent mucho for makes them look bad, especially
>one with cache. Never thought of that. The same thing may exist in TV as
>these are over $1000, and TVs of yesterday were generally in the $200-800
>range.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Joe Hart
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:19 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>The Joe you're thinking about here, I am not Joe Azar.
>
>I have to admit watching the exchanges have me wanting to comment.
>
>1) calling a customer service rep (regardless of title) and asking them to
> create policy is pointless. The folks that write the policies don't
> answer phones and won't allow the folks at that level to do so. The folks
>
> on the phone FOLLOW policy, if they can't resolve the problem a written
> inquiry/complaint is the way to go. The installed base of lamp based RPTV
>
> is so large that lamps will most likely not be a problem for years to
>come.
> There are already several independent lamp suppliers out there that are
> buying the lamps directly from Osram and Philips and selling them directly
>
> to consumers to replace the actual bulb in the "cage" that makes the lamp
> assembly. The only way I see a problem on down the line is if the
> cage for your lamp wears out/fails, as a safeguard I would buy an extra
> lamp now and put it aside. I imagine most of the lamp based units will be
> put out to pasture long before lamps become an issue.
>
>2) I realize a lot of folks out there imagine some sort of back room
> conspiracy to "get" the consumer to buy something they don't want or
> deprive them of some choice, the reality is that the consumer
> drives the market by voting with their dollars. If people bought
> RPTV someone would sell it, the fact is that in most markets that
> Business is going away. When a 50" entry level plasma hit $1500.00,
> the average consumer voted for that over the big box of the RPTV.
> The question isn't absolute performance it's a question of how good is
> good enough for most folks.
>
>3) No, we don't sell Vizio, not that it's a good or bad product we just
>can't
> carry every manufacturer that exists. I imagine some folks will have
> great luck with a vizio and some will have horrible luck (as with any
>
> manufacturer). There isn't something that Vizio (or anyone else) has
> figured out how to do for $1.00 that costs everybody else $5.00 to do.
> The reality is that the costs of manufacturing are fairly close for most
> companies-the way to lower cost is leave something out of the equation,
> support and build quality are the most common items to get dropped.
>
> Part of buying a "better" product is the expectation of longer life and
> higher satisfaction, not every unit is going to be perfect so you will
> (unfortunately) always find someone who has had a bad experience with a
> particular model or manufacturer no matter what level of cost. That's
> where the dealer becomes your ally. We have to intercede on behalf of
> clients with companies from time to time and we'll ask them to do us a
> favor and take care of something that isn't genuinely their fault.
> Sometimes we have to twist their arms but typically when we ask politely
>
> we get the response we all want. Most manufacturers and dealers want to
>
> keep you happy, that's the way they sell more toys.
>
>Anyone who is interested should check out the information that "HD guru"
>dug up and posted about service at some of the companies, to back that up
>look at the results of the owner satisfaction survey that JD Power did on
>HDTVs it's at their web site and if you look into the details you'll see
>some interesting trends in low cost TVs.
>
>Ultimately we work in an industry that evolves quickly. Manufacturers shift
>resources to satisfy consumer demands and make more money they went from CRT
>based RPTV to LCD, DLP, SXRD, LCOS etc. because we wanted a brighter,
>smaller lower cost TV. Now we want thinner TVs and again they will build
>the flat panels that we want.
>
>Cheers to all,
>Joe Hart
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Fr Jack
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:36 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>Joe,
>
>Aren't you a high end audio-video retailer, or do I have you confused with
>another of our long time Tips members?
>
>As a person who has been around this industry for a long time, I would be
>inclined to believe what you say about Vizio.....except that I probably
>couldn't purchase a Vizio at your store, could I?
>
>I'm just an end user whose first HDTV was a Hitachi RPT, and who presently
>owns a Sony SXRD (XBR 1). I like quality that I can afford. Is it just
>possible that there are a lot of people out here who can't afford high end
>stuff and jump at the chance to pay under $2K for a 60" Vizio plasma at
>Sam's or similar outlet? Won't Vizio go out of business if they sell a lot
>of junk? Won't they face a lot of lawsuits for selling junk?
>
>I mean no disrespect.
>
>Jack
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joseph Azar" <[email protected]>
>To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:39 PM
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107
> >
> > Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk and
> > not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do
> > much
> > to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king?
> > Fujitsu
> > is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
> > state of the art.
> >
> > Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores
> > rather
> > than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and
> > service
> > for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
> > costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
> > with better performance.
> >
> > Why even buy poor performance?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> > Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> >
> > As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
> > bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
> > with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a quick
> > look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.
> >
> > In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless of
> > how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing
> > company
> > decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own
> > one
> > and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter how
> > much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
> > unmatched audio quality.
> >
> > Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes all
> > over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now in
> > chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
> > similar interests of quality service.
> >
> > http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory
> >
> > In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
> > consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
> > only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.
> >
> > When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert had:
> > "no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a set
> > at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.
> >
> > Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation
> > at
> > Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after a
> > low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
> > Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the
> > parts,
> > the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite
> > the
> > opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from every
> > part of the industry, including retail.
> >
> > Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.
> >
> > Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to panels
> > that otherwise people could not buy:
> >
> > http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php
> >
> > http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml
> >
> > http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml
> >
> > Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
> > person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.
> >
> > Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
> > Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in
> > perspective,
> > I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he
> > needs
> > to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I
> > offer
> > that option, among others.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> > Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
> > That's
> > how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
> > There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
> > another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
> > work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If
> > I
> > can find the article, I will forward.
> >
> > 6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
> > Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
> > the more profitable one?
> >
> > 9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
> > differences.
> > Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the
> > Pro-Fhd1
> > is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
> >
> > 10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
> > better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
> > but
> > never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
> > about that.
> >
> > See you guys at CES!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> > Behalf Of Richard Fisher
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > 7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
> >
> > Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
> > seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
> >
> > Richard Fisher
> > ISF and HAA certified
> > HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> > Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> Robert,
> >>
> >> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> >> anything of that loss.
> >>
> >> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> >> would check their policy as well.
> >>
> >> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> >> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> >> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> >> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
> >> the
> >> main issue of disappointment.
> >>
> >> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> >> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> >> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
> > not
> >> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
> > itself
> >> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> >> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> >> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
> >>
> >> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> >> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
> >>
> >> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
> > you
> >> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
> >> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
> >> on
> >> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> >> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
> > pixel
> >> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
> > analog
> >> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
> > issue
> >> with time.
> >>
> >> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
> > (in
> >> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
> > compromising
> >> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
> >>
> >> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
> > price
> >> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
> >> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> >> you.
> >>
> >> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
> > with
> >> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
> > have
> >> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> >> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
> > processing,
> >> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> >> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
> > display
> >> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
> > won't.
> >>
> >> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
> >> the
> >> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
> >> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
> > in
> >> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
> >>
> >> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
> >> had
> >> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
> > they
> >> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
> >> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
> > you
> >> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> >> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
> >>
> >> I hope this helps Robert.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Rodolfo La Maestra
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> >> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> >> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> >> Subject: Lost among Choices
> >>
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
> >>
> >> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> >> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> >> to explain.
> >>
> >> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> >> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> >> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> >> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
> >>
> >> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
> >>
> >> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> >> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
> >>
> >> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> >> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
> >>
> >> Advice please.
> >> Best,
> >> Robert B
> >>
> >> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> >> 903-792-2022
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> >> day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> > day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>day) send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>day) send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
>2:02 PM
>
>
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
>2:02 PM
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>that same day) send an email to:
>[email protected]

4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
903-792-2022

<
#18
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I have noticed on the new Directv boxes there is no local antenna provision.
What a scam and shame!



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:20 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

12/29/2007 10:30am ct

Since I started this particular thread, I want to make a point.

It is not possible for even the interested HD consumer to
keep up with all the choices. It's just not possible, and have a life.

One has to immerse oneself in all the latest papers and
other inside briefings in order to keep up with the improvements and
evolution of the plethora of technologies which end up putting an HD
picture in your home.

And I don't think it's fair to expect Joe Six-Pack to
understand the subtleties.

Let's face it. There has been something close to a
conspiracy by the FCC to make sure the public was left uneducated
about digital and HD TV. The FCC dragged their feet on requiring
digital tuners be included in ALL sets since ATSC was adopted. They
didn't learn a thing from the UHF problem of the '60s. Even
traditional NTSC sets should have had mandated digital tuners
included in them by, say, 2001, so the impact of the digital
transition could have been minimized. They kept giving in to the
industry for delay, they've not mandated HD, they've botched
must-carry, and they've not written and published mandatory sales tag
information IN BIG TYPE be included on the sales literature, sales
tags and advertising of digital and HD sets. For instance, in the
last several years, how many people thought they were buying a
standard 720 or 1080 set but got lesser resolution than that? The
answer: "most". Any set not meeting the 720p and 1080i standard
should be required to include a big warning label on the
screen: "This set doesn't cut the mustard". Right now the FCC has
no practical plans for educating the public about the
transition. They've punted everything over to the
industry. Ha! Talk about the fox in the hen house! And have you
ever heard of a sillier plan than to give out coupons for digital set
top boxes to be used with NTSC sets without price controls? The
result will be a rip-off of both the public and the government. It's
as if they were trained by FEMA.

Right now, one of the biggest problems is people buying HD
and not understanding they are not going to be getting HD (on local
channels) from Dish and DirecTV, plus, being aware of the cost of an
upgrade to an HD satellite set-top-box. I don't know how many people
I've talked to who are so proud of their new HD set and don't have a
clue that they aren't watched HD. And let's don't forget the public
not being alerted to the 5:1 issues.

It's a mess.

Best,
Robert














At 01:37 AM 12/29/2007, you wrote:
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>1) This is where connections, longevity in business, and good mfgs. benefit
>the customer. I pick my companies more carefully than they pick me, and I
>make sure I know who the decision makers are to get repairs done for my
>customer. That is the main reason I quit selling Sony years ago and turned
>down the line again 2 months ago.
>
>2) Spiffs, rebates, free merchandise, trips, etc. are powerful motivators
to
>business and sales people alike. The other side of this is the customer
does
>not know HD. 1080, p vs. I, NTSC, 4x3, all is foreign to them. So they buy
>based on "dynamic" settings, trim, unnecessary features, store
presentation,
>and size and price.
>
>3) You are right on!
>
>As for JD Power and other satisfaction surveys, I overheard a very
>interesting conversation a few days ago. The reason Lexus, BMW and other
>high end vehicles get high satisfaction ratings is because the owners do
not
>want to say what they bought is junk, even if it was in the shop for 2
>weeks. Slamming a car they spent mucho for makes them look bad, especially
>one with cache. Never thought of that. The same thing may exist in TV as
>these are over $1000, and TVs of yesterday were generally in the $200-800
>range.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Joe Hart
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:19 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>The Joe you're thinking about here, I am not Joe Azar.
>
>I have to admit watching the exchanges have me wanting to comment.
>
>1) calling a customer service rep (regardless of title) and asking them to
> create policy is pointless. The folks that write the policies don't
> answer phones and won't allow the folks at that level to do so. The
folks
>
> on the phone FOLLOW policy, if they can't resolve the problem a written
> inquiry/complaint is the way to go. The installed base of lamp based
RPTV
>
> is so large that lamps will most likely not be a problem for years to
>come.
> There are already several independent lamp suppliers out there that are
> buying the lamps directly from Osram and Philips and selling them
directly
>
> to consumers to replace the actual bulb in the "cage" that makes the
lamp
> assembly. The only way I see a problem on down the line is if the
> cage for your lamp wears out/fails, as a safeguard I would buy an extra
> lamp now and put it aside. I imagine most of the lamp based units will
be
> put out to pasture long before lamps become an issue.
>
>2) I realize a lot of folks out there imagine some sort of back room
> conspiracy to "get" the consumer to buy something they don't want or
> deprive them of some choice, the reality is that the consumer
> drives the market by voting with their dollars. If people bought
> RPTV someone would sell it, the fact is that in most markets that
> Business is going away. When a 50" entry level plasma hit $1500.00,
> the average consumer voted for that over the big box of the RPTV.
> The question isn't absolute performance it's a question of how good is
> good enough for most folks.
>
>3) No, we don't sell Vizio, not that it's a good or bad product we just
>can't
> carry every manufacturer that exists. I imagine some folks will have
> great luck with a vizio and some will have horrible luck (as with any
>
> manufacturer). There isn't something that Vizio (or anyone else) has
> figured out how to do for $1.00 that costs everybody else $5.00 to do.
> The reality is that the costs of manufacturing are fairly close for most
> companies-the way to lower cost is leave something out of the equation,
> support and build quality are the most common items to get dropped.
>
> Part of buying a "better" product is the expectation of longer life and
> higher satisfaction, not every unit is going to be perfect so you will
> (unfortunately) always find someone who has had a bad experience with a
> particular model or manufacturer no matter what level of cost. That's
> where the dealer becomes your ally. We have to intercede on behalf of
> clients with companies from time to time and we'll ask them to do us a
> favor and take care of something that isn't genuinely their fault.
> Sometimes we have to twist their arms but typically when we ask
politely
>
> we get the response we all want. Most manufacturers and dealers want
to
>
> keep you happy, that's the way they sell more toys.
>
>Anyone who is interested should check out the information that "HD guru"
>dug up and posted about service at some of the companies, to back that up
>look at the results of the owner satisfaction survey that JD Power did on
>HDTVs it's at their web site and if you look into the details you'll see
>some interesting trends in low cost TVs.
>
>Ultimately we work in an industry that evolves quickly. Manufacturers
shift
>resources to satisfy consumer demands and make more money they went from
CRT
>based RPTV to LCD, DLP, SXRD, LCOS etc. because we wanted a brighter,
>smaller lower cost TV. Now we want thinner TVs and again they will build
>the flat panels that we want.
>
>Cheers to all,
>Joe Hart
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Fr Jack
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:36 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>Joe,
>
>Aren't you a high end audio-video retailer, or do I have you confused with
>another of our long time Tips members?
>
>As a person who has been around this industry for a long time, I would be
>inclined to believe what you say about Vizio.....except that I probably
>couldn't purchase a Vizio at your store, could I?
>
>I'm just an end user whose first HDTV was a Hitachi RPT, and who presently
>owns a Sony SXRD (XBR 1). I like quality that I can afford. Is it just
>possible that there are a lot of people out here who can't afford high end
>stuff and jump at the chance to pay under $2K for a 60" Vizio plasma at
>Sam's or similar outlet? Won't Vizio go out of business if they sell a lot
>of junk? Won't they face a lot of lawsuits for selling junk?
>
>I mean no disrespect.
>
>Jack
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joseph Azar" <[email protected]>
>To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:39 PM
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107
> >
> > Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk
and
> > not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do
> > much
> > to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king?
> > Fujitsu
> > is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
> > state of the art.
> >
> > Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores
> > rather
> > than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and
> > service
> > for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
> > costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
> > with better performance.
> >
> > Why even buy poor performance?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> > Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> >
> > As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
> > bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
> > with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a
quick
> > look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.
> >
> > In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless
of
> > how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing
> > company
> > decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own
> > one
> > and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter
how
> > much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
> > unmatched audio quality.
> >
> > Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes
all
> > over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now
in
> > chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
> > similar interests of quality service.
> >
> > http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory
> >
> > In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
> > consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
> > only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.
> >
> > When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert
had:
> > "no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a
set
> > at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.
> >
> > Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation
> > at
> > Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after
a
> > low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
> > Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the
> > parts,
> > the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite
> > the
> > opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from
every
> > part of the industry, including retail.
> >
> > Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.
> >
> > Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to
panels
> > that otherwise people could not buy:
> >
> > http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php
> >
> > http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml
> >
> > http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml
> >
> > Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
> > person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.
> >
> > Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
> > Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in
> > perspective,
> > I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he
> > needs
> > to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I
> > offer
> > that option, among others.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> > Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
> > That's
> > how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
> > There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
> > another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They
may
> > work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire.
If
> > I
> > can find the article, I will forward.
> >
> > 6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
> > Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to
sell
> > the more profitable one?
> >
> > 9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
> > differences.
> > Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the
> > Pro-Fhd1
> > is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
> >
> > 10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
> > better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
> > but
> > never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
> > about that.
> >
> > See you guys at CES!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> > Behalf Of Richard Fisher
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > 7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
> >
> > Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
> > seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
> >
> > Richard Fisher
> > ISF and HAA certified
> > HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> > Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> Robert,
> >>
> >> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> >> anything of that loss.
> >>
> >> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like,
I
> >> would check their policy as well.
> >>
> >> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> >> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On
CRT
> >> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> >> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
> >> the
> >> main issue of disappointment.
> >>
> >> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below
900
> >> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> >> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
> > not
> >> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
> > itself
> >> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical
as
> >> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing
at
> >> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
> >>
> >> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially
the
> >> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in
many).
> >>
> >> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make
sure
> > you
> >> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of
image
> >> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
> >> on
> >> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> >> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
> > pixel
> >> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
> > analog
> >> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
> > issue
> >> with time.
> >>
> >> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
> > (in
> >> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
> > compromising
> >> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
> >>
> >> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
> > price
> >> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the
market
> >> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern
to
> >> you.
> >>
> >> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
> > with
> >> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
> > have
> >> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> >> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
> > processing,
> >> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> >> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
> > display
> >> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
> > won't.
> >>
> >> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
> >> the
> >> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps
you
> >> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best
blacks
> > in
> >> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
> >>
> >> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
> >> had
> >> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
> > they
> >> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the
best
> >> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
> > you
> >> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> >> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
> >>
> >> I hope this helps Robert.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Rodolfo La Maestra
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> >> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> >> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> >> Subject: Lost among Choices
> >>
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
> >>
> >> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> >> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> >> to explain.
> >>
> >> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> >> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> >> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> >> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
> >>
> >> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
> >>
> >> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> >> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
> >>
> >> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> >> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
> >>
> >> Advice please.
> >> Best,
> >> Robert B
> >>
> >> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> >> 903-792-2022
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> >> day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> > day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
>
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>day) send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>day) send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
>2:02 PM
>
>
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
>2:02 PM
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>that same day) send an email to:
>[email protected]

4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
903-792-2022



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#19
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

At 03:52 PM 12/29/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>By the way, we better do not touch the subject of the virtues of vinyl, tube
>amps, and stands "for the cables not to touch the floor", because our good
>friend Robert F. might suffer a temporary increase in blood pressure after
>his last comment about the subject. Who knows? He might be pushed to admit
>that the thousands of laserdiscs jackets displayed on the full wall of his
>HT are actually "vinyl LPs" and the $25K turntable is not shown on the his
>web site.

<g>, Rudolfo!

Actually, the photo is more than a little dated at this point since
the ~2000 LDs have been moved to a back room storage location to make
way for the increasing number of smaller silver platters (over 6000
and counting) in the HT. And within that subset the Red and Blue
cases of HD media are beginning to make their mark felt. Thanks to
the format "war" and "BOGO" (Buy One Get One Free) sales at places
like Amazon.com I'm actually paying less than $8 each for most HD
titles of both formats. Not only does this provide me with high
quality picture, but high quality sound as well (assuming well
constructed original elements). When it's good it doesn't get any
better than this. I thought that "by now" I'd be at about 100 HD
titles, total but thanks to the "buy now" nature of BOGO I recently
crossed the 300 title mark in HD media much sooner than anticipated.

And oh yes, the 1000 or so vinyl albums reside in an upstairs room
(thanks to kids growing up, leaving the nest and providing disposable
room space). The platters still play, and they are still appreciated
for the "subtle nuances" that they provide but they are, after all, a
window to a golden age of sound that, while providing some
"continuous" basic elements that wax nostalgic (pun intended) also
suffer the slings and arrows of extra baggage (limited dynamic range,
ambient noise, etc.) As we have moved from kilo to mega sampling
rates, the real world distinction between the discontinuous and the
continuous becomes impossible to discern by most measures of the
human ear. And throw "golden ager" into the same essay as the
"golden age" and it becomes mostly academic when comparing Vinyl to
modern HD audio.

What's that you said? "Thursday?" Yes, I'll have a glass of water, thank you.

;)


-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#20
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Robert, getting back to your concern, I'm not sure how much this will help
you with a limited budget but here goes.

The Consumer Reports magazine recently said the Panasonic plasma TH-50PZ700U
had the best picture of any flat-panel TV they had ever tested. Since March
2001 I have had the same F38310 which you have and I had always thought it
had the best HDTV picture I had ever seen. But because I wanted a bigger
picture I went into a store in late September, after reading the article, to
see the TH-50PZ700U. I was impressed with the picture but next to it was the
Panasonic TH-50PZ77U which was released earlier in the month by Panasonic.
It was the successor to the TH-50PZ700U and it had a 10,000:1 contrast
ratio, anti glare screen and 100,000 hour panel which the TH-50PZ700U did
not have. Well I purchased the TH-50PZ77U the next day. I have it calibrated
using the Digital Video Essentials DVD and I sit 8.5 feet from the screen
and I am very happy with the picture. I am now saying the TH-50PZ77U has the
best picture I have ever seen.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Wade Brown" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:36 PM
Subject: Lost among Choices


> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT tube)
> which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet to
> explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to replace
> it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084 50"
> 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p and HDMI
> 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#21
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,


This is just to correct your statement below.

There is NO connection for OTA on their new DVR however there is a
connection for OTA of their non-record boxes. I own one of each.

I do also think it's a shame they do not include an OTA hook up on their
latest DVR's. It's short sided thinking with no backwards capability.

They must be thinking newer monitors have a built in ATSC tuners.

Thanks goodness Hughes does not build PC's.

Larry



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 10:07 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I have noticed on the new Directv boxes there is no local antenna provision.
What a scam and shame!



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:20 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

12/29/2007 10:30am ct

Since I started this particular thread, I want to make a point.

It is not possible for even the interested HD consumer to
keep up with all the choices. It's just not possible, and have a life.

One has to immerse oneself in all the latest papers and
other inside briefings in order to keep up with the improvements and
evolution of the plethora of technologies which end up putting an HD
picture in your home.

And I don't think it's fair to expect Joe Six-Pack to
understand the subtleties.

Let's face it. There has been something close to a
conspiracy by the FCC to make sure the public was left uneducated
about digital and HD TV. The FCC dragged their feet on requiring
digital tuners be included in ALL sets since ATSC was adopted. They
didn't learn a thing from the UHF problem of the '60s. Even
traditional NTSC sets should have had mandated digital tuners
included in them by, say, 2001, so the impact of the digital
transition could have been minimized. They kept giving in to the
industry for delay, they've not mandated HD, they've botched
must-carry, and they've not written and published mandatory sales tag
information IN BIG TYPE be included on the sales literature, sales
tags and advertising of digital and HD sets. For instance, in the
last several years, how many people thought they were buying a
standard 720 or 1080 set but got lesser resolution than that? The
answer: "most". Any set not meeting the 720p and 1080i standard
should be required to include a big warning label on the
screen: "This set doesn't cut the mustard". Right now the FCC has
no practical plans for educating the public about the
transition. They've punted everything over to the
industry. Ha! Talk about the fox in the hen house! And have you
ever heard of a sillier plan than to give out coupons for digital set
top boxes to be used with NTSC sets without price controls? The
result will be a rip-off of both the public and the government. It's
as if they were trained by FEMA.

Right now, one of the biggest problems is people buying HD
and not understanding they are not going to be getting HD (on local
channels) from Dish and DirecTV, plus, being aware of the cost of an
upgrade to an HD satellite set-top-box. I don't know how many people
I've talked to who are so proud of their new HD set and don't have a
clue that they aren't watched HD. And let's don't forget the public
not being alerted to the 5:1 issues.

It's a mess.

Best,
Robert














At 01:37 AM 12/29/2007, you wrote:
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>1) This is where connections, longevity in business, and good mfgs. benefit
>the customer. I pick my companies more carefully than they pick me, and I
>make sure I know who the decision makers are to get repairs done for my
>customer. That is the main reason I quit selling Sony years ago and turned
>down the line again 2 months ago.
>
>2) Spiffs, rebates, free merchandise, trips, etc. are powerful motivators
to
>business and sales people alike. The other side of this is the customer
does
>not know HD. 1080, p vs. I, NTSC, 4x3, all is foreign to them. So they buy
>based on "dynamic" settings, trim, unnecessary features, store
presentation,
>and size and price.
>
>3) You are right on!
>
>As for JD Power and other satisfaction surveys, I overheard a very
>interesting conversation a few days ago. The reason Lexus, BMW and other
>high end vehicles get high satisfaction ratings is because the owners do
not
>want to say what they bought is junk, even if it was in the shop for 2
>weeks. Slamming a car they spent mucho for makes them look bad, especially
>one with cache. Never thought of that. The same thing may exist in TV as
>these are over $1000, and TVs of yesterday were generally in the $200-800
>range.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Joe Hart
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:19 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>The Joe you're thinking about here, I am not Joe Azar.
>
>I have to admit watching the exchanges have me wanting to comment.
>
>1) calling a customer service rep (regardless of title) and asking them to
> create policy is pointless. The folks that write the policies don't
> answer phones and won't allow the folks at that level to do so. The
folks
>
> on the phone FOLLOW policy, if they can't resolve the problem a written
> inquiry/complaint is the way to go. The installed base of lamp based
RPTV
>
> is so large that lamps will most likely not be a problem for years to
>come.
> There are already several independent lamp suppliers out there that are
> buying the lamps directly from Osram and Philips and selling them
directly
>
> to consumers to replace the actual bulb in the "cage" that makes the
lamp
> assembly. The only way I see a problem on down the line is if the
> cage for your lamp wears out/fails, as a safeguard I would buy an extra
> lamp now and put it aside. I imagine most of the lamp based units will
be
> put out to pasture long before lamps become an issue.
>
>2) I realize a lot of folks out there imagine some sort of back room
> conspiracy to "get" the consumer to buy something they don't want or
> deprive them of some choice, the reality is that the consumer
> drives the market by voting with their dollars. If people bought
> RPTV someone would sell it, the fact is that in most markets that
> Business is going away. When a 50" entry level plasma hit $1500.00,
> the average consumer voted for that over the big box of the RPTV.
> The question isn't absolute performance it's a question of how good is
> good enough for most folks.
>
>3) No, we don't sell Vizio, not that it's a good or bad product we just
>can't
> carry every manufacturer that exists. I imagine some folks will have
> great luck with a vizio and some will have horrible luck (as with any
>
> manufacturer). There isn't something that Vizio (or anyone else) has
> figured out how to do for $1.00 that costs everybody else $5.00 to do.
> The reality is that the costs of manufacturing are fairly close for most
> companies-the way to lower cost is leave something out of the equation,
> support and build quality are the most common items to get dropped.
>
> Part of buying a "better" product is the expectation of longer life and
> higher satisfaction, not every unit is going to be perfect so you will
> (unfortunately) always find someone who has had a bad experience with a
> particular model or manufacturer no matter what level of cost. That's
> where the dealer becomes your ally. We have to intercede on behalf of
> clients with companies from time to time and we'll ask them to do us a
> favor and take care of something that isn't genuinely their fault.
> Sometimes we have to twist their arms but typically when we ask
politely
>
> we get the response we all want. Most manufacturers and dealers want
to
>
> keep you happy, that's the way they sell more toys.
>
>Anyone who is interested should check out the information that "HD guru"
>dug up and posted about service at some of the companies, to back that up
>look at the results of the owner satisfaction survey that JD Power did on
>HDTVs it's at their web site and if you look into the details you'll see
>some interesting trends in low cost TVs.
>
>Ultimately we work in an industry that evolves quickly. Manufacturers
shift
>resources to satisfy consumer demands and make more money they went from
CRT
>based RPTV to LCD, DLP, SXRD, LCOS etc. because we wanted a brighter,
>smaller lower cost TV. Now we want thinner TVs and again they will build
>the flat panels that we want.
>
>Cheers to all,
>Joe Hart
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Fr Jack
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:36 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>Joe,
>
>Aren't you a high end audio-video retailer, or do I have you confused with
>another of our long time Tips members?
>
>As a person who has been around this industry for a long time, I would be
>inclined to believe what you say about Vizio.....except that I probably
>couldn't purchase a Vizio at your store, could I?
>
>I'm just an end user whose first HDTV was a Hitachi RPT, and who presently
>owns a Sony SXRD (XBR 1). I like quality that I can afford. Is it just
>possible that there are a lot of people out here who can't afford high end
>stuff and jump at the chance to pay under $2K for a 60" Vizio plasma at
>Sam's or similar outlet? Won't Vizio go out of business if they sell a lot
>of junk? Won't they face a lot of lawsuits for selling junk?
>
>I mean no disrespect.
>
>Jack
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joseph Azar" <[email protected]>
>To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:39 PM
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107
> >
> > Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk
and
> > not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do
> > much
> > to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king?
> > Fujitsu
> > is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
> > state of the art.
> >
> > Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores
> > rather
> > than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and
> > service
> > for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
> > costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
> > with better performance.
> >
> > Why even buy poor performance?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> > Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> >
> > As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
> > bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
> > with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a
quick
> > look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.
> >
> > In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless
of
> > how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing
> > company
> > decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own
> > one
> > and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter
how
> > much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
> > unmatched audio quality.
> >
> > Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes
all
> > over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now
in
> > chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
> > similar interests of quality service.
> >
> > http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory
> >
> > In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
> > consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
> > only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.
> >
> > When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert
had:
> > "no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a
set
> > at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.
> >
> > Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation
> > at
> > Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after
a
> > low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
> > Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the
> > parts,
> > the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite
> > the
> > opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from
every
> > part of the industry, including retail.
> >
> > Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.
> >
> > Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to
panels
> > that otherwise people could not buy:
> >
> > http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php
> >
> > http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml
> >
> > http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml
> >
> > Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
> > person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.
> >
> > Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
> > Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in
> > perspective,
> > I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he
> > needs
> > to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I
> > offer
> > that option, among others.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> > Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
> > That's
> > how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
> > There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
> > another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They
may
> > work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire.
If
> > I
> > can find the article, I will forward.
> >
> > 6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
> > Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to
sell
> > the more profitable one?
> >
> > 9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
> > differences.
> > Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the
> > Pro-Fhd1
> > is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
> >
> > 10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
> > better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
> > but
> > never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
> > about that.
> >
> > See you guys at CES!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> > Behalf Of Richard Fisher
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > 7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
> >
> > Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
> > seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
> >
> > Richard Fisher
> > ISF and HAA certified
> > HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> > Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> Robert,
> >>
> >> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> >> anything of that loss.
> >>
> >> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like,
I
> >> would check their policy as well.
> >>
> >> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> >> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On
CRT
> >> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> >> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
> >> the
> >> main issue of disappointment.
> >>
> >> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below
900
> >> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> >> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
> > not
> >> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
> > itself
> >> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical
as
> >> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing
at
> >> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
> >>
> >> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially
the
> >> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in
many).
> >>
> >> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make
sure
> > you
> >> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of
image
> >> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
> >> on
> >> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> >> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
> > pixel
> >> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
> > analog
> >> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
> > issue
> >> with time.
> >>
> >> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
> > (in
> >> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
> > compromising
> >> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
> >>
> >> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
> > price
> >> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the
market
> >> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern
to
> >> you.
> >>
> >> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
> > with
> >> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
> > have
> >> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> >> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
> > processing,
> >> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> >> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
> > display
> >> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
> > won't.
> >>
> >> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
> >> the
> >> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps
you
> >> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best
blacks
> > in
> >> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
> >>
> >> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
> >> had
> >> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
> > they
> >> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the
best
> >> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
> > you
> >> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> >> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
> >>
> >> I hope this helps Robert.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Rodolfo La Maestra
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> >> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> >> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> >> Subject: Lost among Choices
> >>
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
> >>
> >> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> >> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> >> to explain.
> >>
> >> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> >> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> >> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> >> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
> >>
> >> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
> >>
> >> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> >> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
> >>
> >> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> >> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
> >>
> >> Advice please.
> >> Best,
> >> Robert B
> >>
> >> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> >> 903-792-2022
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> >> day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> > day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
>
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>day) send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>day) send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
>2:02 PM
>
>
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
>2:02 PM
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>that same day) send an email to:
>[email protected]

4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
903-792-2022



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Editio
#22
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

My further explanation on D* HD dvr's... the older 20-700(or-100) had the OTA connection
and capability and is still available either by luck or hard bargaining. The 21-700 at this time
does not have OTA capability BUT there is some sort of hardware/software fix in the works
to gve the 21-700 OTA ability.

Tony

On 29 Dec 2007 at 12:35, Larry Megugorac wrote:

> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Joe,
>
>
> This is just to correct your statement below.
>
> There is NO connection for OTA on their new DVR however there is a
> connection for OTA of their non-record boxes. I own one of each.
>
> I do also think it's a shame they do not include an OTA hook up on their
> latest DVR's. It's short sided thinking with no backwards capability.
>
> They must be thinking newer monitors have a built in ATSC tuners.
>
> Thanks goodness Hughes does not build PC's.
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 10:07 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> I have noticed on the new Directv boxes there is no local antenna provision.
> What a scam and shame!


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#23
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joseph,

Good, it looks like you are actually doing what I suggested regarding
passing some savings to the consumer, and in your case even better because
you pass the savings even when you still give the advice and the effort.

I have to admit that there is one thing you said to me personally in one of
the last conferences that I take my hat off, there is no owner or manager of
ANY of the hi end places I am familiarized with that would do what you do:
"taking your staff to attend to real life acoustic musical events to let
them learn the inner details of musical instruments, their tones, harmonics,
musical arrangements, etc.

After all a good hi-end store should properly demo and sell high quality
electronic equipment to try to imitate as much as possible a real life
musical event, and any salesman should know what is the real thing before
they can demo how each amp or speaker can convey the musical inner details
differently, to the same ears, and been able to explain it.

Exactly the same should apply to HDTV, many do not even know how a properly
ISF calibrated set looks like, and many do not even know what ISF is.

On my other email I mentioned about stores and consumers being lost in
differentiating between quality and not, and that might be a driver for
looking for rock bottom prices on buying anything, but many years ago I
thought that by now, one year before flicking the switch out of analog TV,
would be much better than what it is.

Ironically, the situation now is similar than when I wrote the following
article 4 years ago for another HDTV magazine about the same subject, there
is no much improvement on the human part, other than the abundance of HD
panels on the showroom and hi def DVD as source in some individual demos,
the increase was in the Internet information, online stores, forums, actual
owners detailing experiences, etc.

http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/20 ... _be_prepar
ed_to_select_the_one_for_you.php

This reminds me of the changes the car dealership industry suffered since
the Internet is now the source of research for most car buyers before they
get to a showroom, if they get to a showroom. Those buyers research all the
options, the dealer cost of each of them, the dealer and manufacturer
discounts, and compare between online and brick and mortar dealers; when
they enter the showroom the negotiation starts from the dealer-cost up
rather than sticker-window down as it use to be.

It seems your store might deserve the "queen" status, at lest for hi end
audio.

By the way, we better do not touch the subject of the virtues of vinyl, tube
amps, and stands "for the cables not to touch the floor", because our good
friend Robert F. might suffer a temporary increase in blood pressure after
his last comment about the subject. Who knows? He might be pushed to admit
that the thousands of laserdiscs jackets displayed on the full wall of his
HT are actually "vinyl LPs" and the $25K turntable is not shown on the his
web site.

Take care Joseph.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:23 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Damn, where is that queen? Is it a real female, or just a drag one? When you
find the queen around here, parade that sucker by, Rodolfo. In the meantime,
your son and I can check out the ones in LV!

My local repair company informs me of good vs. junk stuff, gear they will
take, gear they would rather not, and gear that I can just go throw in the
river as they never want to see it. That article came from them, and they
are quite competent, ISF, and old timers in the biz.

Unfortunately, it is hard to know all about all video. Even you struggle to
know whats what. We try at my store and do a satisfactory job, even though
half of us are really stereo music lovers and can give you a real ear
education. I may even give you a turntable ed if I can ever find time to sit
down and write the course material.

Surprise! We sell Panny and Pioneer for the same, or less than the big guys.
Yep. You heard right. The 5000ex and pro hd1 we sell for $2999. We sell the
1080 50" Kuro for $500 or more less than BB. We do not get rich like this,
but make a decent profit, yet more importantly, take care of our customers.
I allow calls to my mobile up to midnight, and even had one Thanksgiving
that I solved via phone. But it was a national emergency: football day!

I know the small stores like mine are disappearing rapidly, and what a
shame! However, with the housing crisis, I hear from reps the appointment
only and trunk slammers are also disappearing. I do believe that our retail
biz will again grow due to the need for somewhere to call for real info and
help. Get them all day: "I can't get my _____ to work. What do I do?"

"Yes, where did you buy it? Have you tried calling them?"

"Yes, but they can't help me. They don't seem to know."

At that point I suggest a either a service call at hourly rates, to include
our learning time on gear we do not sell, or take it back and come buy from
us at the same price for better gear.

My point is we are losing specialists in many fields, not only audio/video.
When is the last time you saw a good photo shop, one that can help you buy a
good film or electronic camera? By not patronizing craftsmen, we lose them,
and ultimately hurt ourselves. One of the big problems for high end guys is
the lack of showrooms and intelligent sales personnel for their product. The
internet serves them poorly, and you too for truly purchasing correctly.

As one customer just told one of our staff, why would I want to buy from the
internet or appointment only? I want to try it and have some one who can
help anytime after I buy it.





-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:38 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,

I understand your valid concern.

When VHS was preferred was not for quality either, when LCD was preferred
was not for quality either. Massive amounts of people buy those, and many
of those do not even care for your store type.

That wheel is running since hi-fi was invented and the Internet and Costco
type shifted the savings with lower prices to the buyer, not to the salesman
that in most cases is poorly informed, and have done nothing other than
pointing to a floor sample they do not even know or properly calibrate for
proper presentation and comparison.

Many times I go to hi and low end stores to listen to the gross errors and
misinformation their ignorance fills consumers heads, then I take those
consumers to the side, present myself, and give them true knowledge, free.

Your store might be different, but I could not find one in ten years of HDTV
that really knew well the technology and the products, I make them pass all
kinds of tests, and 99% of them fail, and with a face of confidence.

That is the state of business.

You have not provided a source for the Vizio "junk" issue, other than the
article that talks about warranties for tier levels. Those will always
exist. Out of warranty tier 1 also makes people pay for all the expenses,
and they are not cheap, so this is pay now or pay later, and most prefer the
"pay-later" chance because they might be lucky and actually "pay-never", and
the money is in their pocket since day one.

When a plasma sells for hundreds to a $1000 less on Costco or the Internet
than in the brick and mortar uninformed place, that by itself pays for many
many years of extended warranty if that is the buyer's concern.
Joe-six-pack has the choice to buy the warranty with that saving or use the
money for a whole surround system, cabinets, etc.

In other words, how to spend the saving is on the consumer control, not as
an inaccessible commission in the salesmen pocket that no even know the
products they sell; and those are not only the BB and CC type, but also hi
end places that charge full MSRP and believe they are the Queen of HDTV.

The way I see it is simple, the value added service/knowledge a good store
can give to a consumer has become now too expensive by current standards
compared to alternative markets anyone has access to, which means that
survival without knowledge and sensitive overhead cost could not be
possible.

Look at it from another angle, if an informed consumer gets into those
stores, ignores the uninformed salesmen, points to a product and just signs
the check and leave, the store does not pass the value of the not provided
effort as a saving to the consumer, maybe they should start to do that in a
flexible way at the moment of negotiating the sale.

So it comes to "who controls the savings", and consumers will always try to
control the savings, especially when they are large, they have done the
research already, and the store has done nothing regarding advice, even when
they know that a Vizio is inferior to a Panasonic.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:39 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107

Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk and
not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do much
to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king? Fujitsu
is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
state of the art.

Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores rather
than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and service
for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
with better performance.

Why even buy poor performance?




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----


As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a quick
look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.

In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless of
how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing company
decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own one
and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter how
much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
unmatched audio quality.

Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes all
over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now in
chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
similar interests of quality service.

http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory

In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.

When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert had:
"no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a set
at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.

Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation at
Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after a
low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the parts,
the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite the
opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from every
part of the industry, including retail.

Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.

Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to panels
that otherwise people could not buy:

http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php

http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml

http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml

Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.

Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in perspective,
I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he needs
to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I offer
that option, among others.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts. That's
how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If I
can find the article, I will forward.

6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
the more profitable one?

9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these differences.
Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-Fhd1
is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.

10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it. but
never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
about that.

See you guys at CES!




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Richard Fisher
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails

Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Robert,
>
> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> anything of that loss.
>
> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> would check their policy as well.
>
> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times the
> main issue of disappointment.
>
> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
not
> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
itself
> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>
> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>
> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
you
> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like) on
> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
pixel
> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
analog
> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
issue
> with time.
>
> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
(in
> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
compromising
> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>
> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
price
> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> you.
>
> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
with
> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
have
> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
processing,
> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
display
> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
won't.
>
> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than the
> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
in
> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>
> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you had
> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
they
> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
you
> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>
> I hope this helps Robert.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> to explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#24
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Robert,

It seems the FCC could be to blame for the delay of inclusion of integrated
tuners until 2002 but the reality is that the cost was so high at that time,
and the circuitry reliability so unpredictable that a consumer would have
been better off if no mandate was issued until STB tuners would actually be
under $50 (which meant they would cost much less when integrated within a
TV), and their reliability improved (no one would want an unpredictable
failing tuner into an expensive set).

At the time the tuners were integrated the average increase caused by the
tuner on an integrated TV over the monitor TV version, when both were
available, was $704 in 2003, some LG integrated plasmas cost $1000 more than
the monitor versions, just for an ATSC tuner, no CableCARD tuner, today you
can buy the entire plasma for that money, not just the tuner.

The history of HD-STBs has been full of roadblocks since 1998, some tuners
back then were over $3000, and there were all kinds of problems with all
brands, even on DirecTV and Dishnetwork, they were frozen, dead,
intermittent failures, overheating, dropping channels, you name it.

Here is an analysis I wrote back then when this integrated tuner idea was
introduced in 2002.

Here is a TV program were I briefly touched the subject (toward the end of
the 25 minute show).

Here is the article that was with a split link on my other email, in one
section I cover integrated tuners.

Here is further coverage of the complexity of the issue and how HD tuners
interact with it and some of your questions.

The FCC should have made an "industry wide" program for the mass development
of tuners back when HDTV was in the works in the 80/90s, planning for the
high cost and reliability issues that surfaced they were introduced in 1998.
They waited too long and left it to the market forces without guidance and
leadership.

The consequence: most HDTVs sold for the following 4 years (98-02) were
bought for viewing 480p DVD in widescreen not to watch HDTV, increasing the
perceived resolution of existing DVDs and DVD players by using the DTV
line-doubler circuitry (as we use to call that then), and it was too late
for economies of scale to kick in for tuners to be cheap and reliable in
volume.

By the time the FCC woke up it was 2002/3, it then mandated tuner
integration in an irrational order when tuners were still not ready for
economies of scale pricing and reliability.

Now, 5 years later, we look at it from another perspective because the worst
part of the storm is over, and there are no monitor versions of current
integrated TVs to compare with, but that is what really happened.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:20 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

12/29/2007 10:30am ct

Since I started this particular thread, I want to make a point.

It is not possible for even the interested HD consumer to
keep up with all the choices. It's just not possible, and have a life.

One has to immerse oneself in all the latest papers and
other inside briefings in order to keep up with the improvements and
evolution of the plethora of technologies which end up putting an HD
picture in your home.

And I don't think it's fair to expect Joe Six-Pack to
understand the subtleties.

Let's face it. There has been something close to a
conspiracy by the FCC to make sure the public was left uneducated
about digital and HD TV. The FCC dragged their feet on requiring
digital tuners be included in ALL sets since ATSC was adopted. They
didn't learn a thing from the UHF problem of the '60s. Even
traditional NTSC sets should have had mandated digital tuners
included in them by, say, 2001, so the impact of the digital
transition could have been minimized. They kept giving in to the
industry for delay, they've not mandated HD, they've botched
must-carry, and they've not written and published mandatory sales tag
information IN BIG TYPE be included on the sales literature, sales
tags and advertising of digital and HD sets. For instance, in the
last several years, how many people thought they were buying a
standard 720 or 1080 set but got lesser resolution than that? The
answer: "most". Any set not meeting the 720p and 1080i standard
should be required to include a big warning label on the
screen: "This set doesn't cut the mustard". Right now the FCC has
no practical plans for educating the public about the
transition. They've punted everything over to the
industry. Ha! Talk about the fox in the hen house! And have you
ever heard of a sillier plan than to give out coupons for digital set
top boxes to be used with NTSC sets without price controls? The
result will be a rip-off of both the public and the government. It's
as if they were trained by FEMA.

Right now, one of the biggest problems is people buying HD
and not understanding they are not going to be getting HD (on local
channels) from Dish and DirecTV, plus, being aware of the cost of an
upgrade to an HD satellite set-top-box. I don't know how many people
I've talked to who are so proud of their new HD set and don't have a
clue that they aren't watched HD. And let's don't forget the public
not being alerted to the 5:1 issues.

It's a mess.

Best,
Robert












At 01:37 AM 12/29/2007, you wrote:
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>1) This is where connections, longevity in business, and good mfgs. benefit
>the customer. I pick my companies more carefully than they pick me, and I
>make sure I know who the decision makers are to get repairs done for my
>customer. That is the main reason I quit selling Sony years ago and turned
>down the line again 2 months ago.
>
>2) Spiffs, rebates, free merchandise, trips, etc. are powerful motivators
to
>business and sales people alike. The other side of this is the customer
does
>not know HD. 1080, p vs. I, NTSC, 4x3, all is foreign to them. So they buy
>based on "dynamic" settings, trim, unnecessary features, store
presentation,
>and size and price.
>
>3) You are right on!
>
>As for JD Power and other satisfaction surveys, I overheard a very
>interesting conversation a few days ago. The reason Lexus, BMW and other
>high end vehicles get high satisfaction ratings is because the owners do
not
>want to say what they bought is junk, even if it was in the shop for 2
>weeks. Slamming a car they spent mucho for makes them look bad, especially
>one with cache. Never thought of that. The same thing may exist in TV as
>these are over $1000, and TVs of yesterday were generally in the $200-800
>range.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Joe Hart
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:19 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>The Joe you're thinking about here, I am not Joe Azar.
>
>I have to admit watching the exchanges have me wanting to comment.
>
>1) calling a customer service rep (regardless of title) and asking them to
> create policy is pointless. The folks that write the policies don't
> answer phones and won't allow the folks at that level to do so. The
folks
>
> on the phone FOLLOW policy, if they can't resolve the problem a written
> inquiry/complaint is the way to go. The installed base of lamp based
RPTV
>
> is so large that lamps will most likely not be a problem for years to
>come.
> There are already several independent lamp suppliers out there that are
> buying the lamps directly from Osram and Philips and selling them
directly
>
> to consumers to replace the actual bulb in the "cage" that makes the
lamp
> assembly. The only way I see a problem on down the line is if the
> cage for your lamp wears out/fails, as a safeguard I would buy an extra
> lamp now and put it aside. I imagine most of the lamp based units will
be
> put out to pasture long before lamps become an issue.
>
>2) I realize a lot of folks out there imagine some sort of back room
> conspiracy to "get" the consumer to buy something they don't want or
> deprive them of some choice, the reality is that the consumer
> drives the market by voting with their dollars. If people bought
> RPTV someone would sell it, the fact is that in most markets that
> Business is going away. When a 50" entry level plasma hit $1500.00,
> the average consumer voted for that over the big box of the RPTV.
> The question isn't absolute performance it's a question of how good is
> good enough for most folks.
>
>3) No, we don't sell Vizio, not that it's a good or bad product we just
>can't
> carry every manufacturer that exists. I imagine some folks will have
> great luck with a vizio and some will have horrible luck (as with any
>
> manufacturer). There isn't something that Vizio (or anyone else) has
> figured out how to do for $1.00 that costs everybody else $5.00 to do.
> The reality is that the costs of manufacturing are fairly close for most
> companies-the way to lower cost is leave something out of the equation,
> support and build quality are the most common items to get dropped.
>
> Part of buying a "better" product is the expectation of longer life and
> higher satisfaction, not every unit is going to be perfect so you will
> (unfortunately) always find someone who has had a bad experience with a
> particular model or manufacturer no matter what level of cost. That's
> where the dealer becomes your ally. We have to intercede on behalf of
> clients with companies from time to time and we'll ask them to do us a
> favor and take care of something that isn't genuinely their fault.
> Sometimes we have to twist their arms but typically when we ask
politely
>
> we get the response we all want. Most manufacturers and dealers want
to
>
> keep you happy, that's the way they sell more toys.
>
>Anyone who is interested should check out the information that "HD guru"
>dug up and posted about service at some of the companies, to back that up
>look at the results of the owner satisfaction survey that JD Power did on
>HDTVs it's at their web site and if you look into the details you'll see
>some interesting trends in low cost TVs.
>
>Ultimately we work in an industry that evolves quickly. Manufacturers
shift
>resources to satisfy consumer demands and make more money they went from
CRT
>based RPTV to LCD, DLP, SXRD, LCOS etc. because we wanted a brighter,
>smaller lower cost TV. Now we want thinner TVs and again they will build
>the flat panels that we want.
>
>Cheers to all,
>Joe Hart
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Fr Jack
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:36 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>Joe,
>
>Aren't you a high end audio-video retailer, or do I have you confused with
>another of our long time Tips members?
>
>As a person who has been around this industry for a long time, I would be
>inclined to believe what you say about Vizio.....except that I probably
>couldn't purchase a Vizio at your store, could I?
>
>I'm just an end user whose first HDTV was a Hitachi RPT, and who presently
>owns a Sony SXRD (XBR 1). I like quality that I can afford. Is it just
>possible that there are a lot of people out here who can't afford high end
>stuff and jump at the chance to pay under $2K for a 60" Vizio plasma at
>Sam's or similar outlet? Won't Vizio go out of business if they sell a lot
>of junk? Won't they face a lot of lawsuits for selling junk?
>
>I mean no disrespect.
>
>Jack
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joseph Azar" <[email protected]>
>To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:39 PM
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107
> >
> > Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk
and
> > not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do
> > much
> > to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king?
> > Fujitsu
> > is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
> > state of the art.
> >
> > Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores
> > rather
> > than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and
> > service
> > for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
> > costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
> > with better performance.
> >
> > Why even buy poor performance?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> > Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> >
> > As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
> > bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
> > with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a
quick
> > look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.
> >
> > In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless
of
> > how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing
> > company
> > decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own
> > one
> > and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter
how
> > much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
> > unmatched audio quality.
> >
> > Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes
all
> > over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now
in
> > chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
> > similar interests of quality service.
> >
> > http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory
> >
> > In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
> > consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
> > only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.
> >
> > When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert
had:
> > "no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a
set
> > at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.
> >
> > Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation
> > at
> > Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after
a
> > low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
> > Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the
> > parts,
> > the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite
> > the
> > opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from
every
> > part of the industry, including retail.
> >
> > Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.
> >
> > Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to
panels
> > that otherwise people could not buy:
> >
> > http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php
> >
> > http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml
> >
> > http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml
> >
> > Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
> > person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.
> >
> > Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
> > Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in
> > perspective,
> > I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he
> > needs
> > to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I
> > offer
> > that option, among others.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> > Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
> > That's
> > how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
> > There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
> > another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They
may
> > work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire.
If
> > I
> > can find the article, I will forward.
> >
> > 6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
> > Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to
sell
> > the more profitable one?
> >
> > 9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
> > differences.
> > Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the
> > Pro-Fhd1
> > is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
> >
> > 10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
> > better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
> > but
> > never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
> > about that.
> >
> > See you guys at CES!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> > Behalf Of Richard Fisher
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > 7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
> >
> > Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
> > seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
> >
> > Richard Fisher
> > ISF and HAA certified
> > HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> > Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> Robert,
> >>
> >> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> >> anything of that loss.
> >>
> >> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like,
I
> >> would check their policy as well.
> >>
> >> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> >> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On
CRT
> >> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> >> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
> >> the
> >> main issue of disappointment.
> >>
> >> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below
900
> >> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> >> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
> > not
> >> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
> > itself
> >> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical
as
> >> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing
at
> >> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
> >>
> >> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially
the
> >> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in
many).
> >>
> >> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make
sure
> > you
> >> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of
image
> >> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
> >> on
> >> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> >> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
> > pixel
> >> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
> > analog
> >> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
> > issue
> >> with time.
> >>
> >> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
> > (in
> >> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
> > compromising
> >> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
> >>
> >> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
> > price
> >> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the
market
> >> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern
to
> >> you.
> >>
> >> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
> > with
> >> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
> > have
> >> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> >> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
> > processing,
> >> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> >> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
> > display
> >> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
> > won't.
> >>
> >> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
> >> the
> >> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps
you
> >> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best
blacks
> > in
> >> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
> >>
> >> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
> >> had
> >> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
> > they
> >> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the
best
> >> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
> > you
> >> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> >> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
> >>
> >> I hope this helps Robert.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Rodolfo La Maestra
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> >> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> >> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> >> Subject: Lost among Choices
> >>
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
> >>
> >> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> >> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> >> to explain.
> >>
> >> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> >> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> >> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> >> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
> >>
> >> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
> >>
> >> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> >> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
> >>
> >> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> >> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
> >>
> >> Advice please.
> >> Best,
> >> Robert B
> >>
> >> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> >> 903-792-2022
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> >> day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> > day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
>
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: hdtvmagazin
#25
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Ironically, the 700 has a much better sound.


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Roger Bennett
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:37 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Robert, getting back to your concern, I'm not sure how much this will help
you with a limited budget but here goes.

The Consumer Reports magazine recently said the Panasonic plasma TH-50PZ700U

had the best picture of any flat-panel TV they had ever tested. Since March
2001 I have had the same F38310 which you have and I had always thought it
had the best HDTV picture I had ever seen. But because I wanted a bigger
picture I went into a store in late September, after reading the article, to

see the TH-50PZ700U. I was impressed with the picture but next to it was the

Panasonic TH-50PZ77U which was released earlier in the month by Panasonic.
It was the successor to the TH-50PZ700U and it had a 10,000:1 contrast
ratio, anti glare screen and 100,000 hour panel which the TH-50PZ700U did
not have. Well I purchased the TH-50PZ77U the next day. I have it calibrated

using the Digital Video Essentials DVD and I sit 8.5 feet from the screen
and I am very happy with the picture. I am now saying the TH-50PZ77U has the

best picture I have ever seen.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Wade Brown" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:36 PM
Subject: Lost among Choices


> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT tube)
> which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet to
> explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to replace
> it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084 50"
> 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p and HDMI

> 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same

> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#26
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

No, they are thinking why give away free local when we can charge them a
monthly fee for local.



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Larry Megugorac
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 3:35 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,


This is just to correct your statement below.

There is NO connection for OTA on their new DVR however there is a
connection for OTA of their non-record boxes. I own one of each.

I do also think it's a shame they do not include an OTA hook up on their
latest DVR's. It's short sided thinking with no backwards capability.

They must be thinking newer monitors have a built in ATSC tuners.

Thanks goodness Hughes does not build PC's.

Larry



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 10:07 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I have noticed on the new Directv boxes there is no local antenna provision.
What a scam and shame!



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:20 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

12/29/2007 10:30am ct

Since I started this particular thread, I want to make a point.

It is not possible for even the interested HD consumer to
keep up with all the choices. It's just not possible, and have a life.

One has to immerse oneself in all the latest papers and
other inside briefings in order to keep up with the improvements and
evolution of the plethora of technologies which end up putting an HD
picture in your home.

And I don't think it's fair to expect Joe Six-Pack to
understand the subtleties.

Let's face it. There has been something close to a
conspiracy by the FCC to make sure the public was left uneducated
about digital and HD TV. The FCC dragged their feet on requiring
digital tuners be included in ALL sets since ATSC was adopted. They
didn't learn a thing from the UHF problem of the '60s. Even
traditional NTSC sets should have had mandated digital tuners
included in them by, say, 2001, so the impact of the digital
transition could have been minimized. They kept giving in to the
industry for delay, they've not mandated HD, they've botched
must-carry, and they've not written and published mandatory sales tag
information IN BIG TYPE be included on the sales literature, sales
tags and advertising of digital and HD sets. For instance, in the
last several years, how many people thought they were buying a
standard 720 or 1080 set but got lesser resolution than that? The
answer: "most". Any set not meeting the 720p and 1080i standard
should be required to include a big warning label on the
screen: "This set doesn't cut the mustard". Right now the FCC has
no practical plans for educating the public about the
transition. They've punted everything over to the
industry. Ha! Talk about the fox in the hen house! And have you
ever heard of a sillier plan than to give out coupons for digital set
top boxes to be used with NTSC sets without price controls? The
result will be a rip-off of both the public and the government. It's
as if they were trained by FEMA.

Right now, one of the biggest problems is people buying HD
and not understanding they are not going to be getting HD (on local
channels) from Dish and DirecTV, plus, being aware of the cost of an
upgrade to an HD satellite set-top-box. I don't know how many people
I've talked to who are so proud of their new HD set and don't have a
clue that they aren't watched HD. And let's don't forget the public
not being alerted to the 5:1 issues.

It's a mess.

Best,
Robert














At 01:37 AM 12/29/2007, you wrote:
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>1) This is where connections, longevity in business, and good mfgs. benefit
>the customer. I pick my companies more carefully than they pick me, and I
>make sure I know who the decision makers are to get repairs done for my
>customer. That is the main reason I quit selling Sony years ago and turned
>down the line again 2 months ago.
>
>2) Spiffs, rebates, free merchandise, trips, etc. are powerful motivators
to
>business and sales people alike. The other side of this is the customer
does
>not know HD. 1080, p vs. I, NTSC, 4x3, all is foreign to them. So they buy
>based on "dynamic" settings, trim, unnecessary features, store
presentation,
>and size and price.
>
>3) You are right on!
>
>As for JD Power and other satisfaction surveys, I overheard a very
>interesting conversation a few days ago. The reason Lexus, BMW and other
>high end vehicles get high satisfaction ratings is because the owners do
not
>want to say what they bought is junk, even if it was in the shop for 2
>weeks. Slamming a car they spent mucho for makes them look bad, especially
>one with cache. Never thought of that. The same thing may exist in TV as
>these are over $1000, and TVs of yesterday were generally in the $200-800
>range.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Joe Hart
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:19 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>The Joe you're thinking about here, I am not Joe Azar.
>
>I have to admit watching the exchanges have me wanting to comment.
>
>1) calling a customer service rep (regardless of title) and asking them to
> create policy is pointless. The folks that write the policies don't
> answer phones and won't allow the folks at that level to do so. The
folks
>
> on the phone FOLLOW policy, if they can't resolve the problem a written
> inquiry/complaint is the way to go. The installed base of lamp based
RPTV
>
> is so large that lamps will most likely not be a problem for years to
>come.
> There are already several independent lamp suppliers out there that are
> buying the lamps directly from Osram and Philips and selling them
directly
>
> to consumers to replace the actual bulb in the "cage" that makes the
lamp
> assembly. The only way I see a problem on down the line is if the
> cage for your lamp wears out/fails, as a safeguard I would buy an extra
> lamp now and put it aside. I imagine most of the lamp based units will
be
> put out to pasture long before lamps become an issue.
>
>2) I realize a lot of folks out there imagine some sort of back room
> conspiracy to "get" the consumer to buy something they don't want or
> deprive them of some choice, the reality is that the consumer
> drives the market by voting with their dollars. If people bought
> RPTV someone would sell it, the fact is that in most markets that
> Business is going away. When a 50" entry level plasma hit $1500.00,
> the average consumer voted for that over the big box of the RPTV.
> The question isn't absolute performance it's a question of how good is
> good enough for most folks.
>
>3) No, we don't sell Vizio, not that it's a good or bad product we just
>can't
> carry every manufacturer that exists. I imagine some folks will have
> great luck with a vizio and some will have horrible luck (as with any
>
> manufacturer). There isn't something that Vizio (or anyone else) has
> figured out how to do for $1.00 that costs everybody else $5.00 to do.
> The reality is that the costs of manufacturing are fairly close for most
> companies-the way to lower cost is leave something out of the equation,
> support and build quality are the most common items to get dropped.
>
> Part of buying a "better" product is the expectation of longer life and
> higher satisfaction, not every unit is going to be perfect so you will
> (unfortunately) always find someone who has had a bad experience with a
> particular model or manufacturer no matter what level of cost. That's
> where the dealer becomes your ally. We have to intercede on behalf of
> clients with companies from time to time and we'll ask them to do us a
> favor and take care of something that isn't genuinely their fault.
> Sometimes we have to twist their arms but typically when we ask
politely
>
> we get the response we all want. Most manufacturers and dealers want
to
>
> keep you happy, that's the way they sell more toys.
>
>Anyone who is interested should check out the information that "HD guru"
>dug up and posted about service at some of the companies, to back that up
>look at the results of the owner satisfaction survey that JD Power did on
>HDTVs it's at their web site and if you look into the details you'll see
>some interesting trends in low cost TVs.
>
>Ultimately we work in an industry that evolves quickly. Manufacturers
shift
>resources to satisfy consumer demands and make more money they went from
CRT
>based RPTV to LCD, DLP, SXRD, LCOS etc. because we wanted a brighter,
>smaller lower cost TV. Now we want thinner TVs and again they will build
>the flat panels that we want.
>
>Cheers to all,
>Joe Hart
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>Behalf Of Fr Jack
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:36 AM
>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
>Joe,
>
>Aren't you a high end audio-video retailer, or do I have you confused with
>another of our long time Tips members?
>
>As a person who has been around this industry for a long time, I would be
>inclined to believe what you say about Vizio.....except that I probably
>couldn't purchase a Vizio at your store, could I?
>
>I'm just an end user whose first HDTV was a Hitachi RPT, and who presently
>owns a Sony SXRD (XBR 1). I like quality that I can afford. Is it just
>possible that there are a lot of people out here who can't afford high end
>stuff and jump at the chance to pay under $2K for a 60" Vizio plasma at
>Sam's or similar outlet? Won't Vizio go out of business if they sell a lot
>of junk? Won't they face a lot of lawsuits for selling junk?
>
>I mean no disrespect.
>
>Jack
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joseph Azar" <[email protected]>
>To: "HDTV Magazine Tips List" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:39 PM
>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
>
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107
> >
> > Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk
and
> > not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do
> > much
> > to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king?
> > Fujitsu
> > is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
> > state of the art.
> >
> > Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores
> > rather
> > than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and
> > service
> > for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
> > costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
> > with better performance.
> >
> > Why even buy poor performance?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> > Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> >
> > As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
> > bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
> > with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a
quick
> > look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.
> >
> > In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless
of
> > how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing
> > company
> > decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own
> > one
> > and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter
how
> > much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
> > unmatched audio quality.
> >
> > Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes
all
> > over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now
in
> > chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
> > similar interests of quality service.
> >
> > http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory
> >
> > In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
> > consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
> > only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.
> >
> > When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert
had:
> > "no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a
set
> > at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.
> >
> > Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation
> > at
> > Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after
a
> > low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
> > Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the
> > parts,
> > the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite
> > the
> > opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from
every
> > part of the industry, including retail.
> >
> > Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.
> >
> > Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to
panels
> > that otherwise people could not buy:
> >
> > http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php
> >
> > http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml
> >
> > http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml
> >
> > Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
> > person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.
> >
> > Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
> > Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in
> > perspective,
> > I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he
> > needs
> > to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I
> > offer
> > that option, among others.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> > Behalf Of Joseph Azar
> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
> > That's
> > how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
> > There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
> > another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They
may
> > work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire.
If
> > I
> > can find the article, I will forward.
> >
> > 6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
> > Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to
sell
> > the more profitable one?
> >
> > 9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
> > differences.
> > Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the
> > Pro-Fhd1
> > is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
> >
> > 10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
> > better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
> > but
> > never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
> > about that.
> >
> > See you guys at CES!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> > Behalf Of Richard Fisher
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
> > To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> > Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
> >
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > 7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
> >
> > Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
> > seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
> >
> > Richard Fisher
> > ISF and HAA certified
> > HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> > Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
> >
> > Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> Robert,
> >>
> >> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> >> anything of that loss.
> >>
> >> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like,
I
> >> would check their policy as well.
> >>
> >> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> >> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On
CRT
> >> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> >> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
> >> the
> >> main issue of disappointment.
> >>
> >> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below
900
> >> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> >> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
> > not
> >> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
> > itself
> >> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical
as
> >> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing
at
> >> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
> >>
> >> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially
the
> >> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in
many).
> >>
> >> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make
sure
> > you
> >> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of
image
> >> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
> >> on
> >> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> >> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
> > pixel
> >> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
> > analog
> >> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
> > issue
> >> with time.
> >>
> >> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
> > (in
> >> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
> > compromising
> >> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
> >>
> >> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
> > price
> >> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the
market
> >> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern
to
> >> you.
> >>
> >> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
> > with
> >> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
> > have
> >> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> >> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
> > processing,
> >> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> >> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
> > display
> >> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
> > won't.
> >>
> >> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
> >> the
> >> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps
you
> >> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best
blacks
> > in
> >> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
> >>
> >> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
> >> had
> >> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
> > they
> >> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the
best
> >> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
> > you
> >> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> >> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
> >>
> >> I hope this helps Robert.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Rodolfo La Maestra
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List
On
> >> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> >> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> >> Subject: Lost among Choices
> >>
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
> >>
> >> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> >> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> >> to explain.
> >>
> >> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> >> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> >> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> >> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
> >>
> >> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
> >>
> >> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> >> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
> >>
> >> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> >> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
> >>
> >> Advice please.
> >> Best,
> >> Robert B
> >>
> >> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> >> 903-792-2022
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> >> day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> > day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
> > 12/22/2007
> > 2:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
same
>
> > day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>day) send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>day) send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
>2:02 PM
>
>
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
>2:02 PM
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>that same day) send an email to:
>[email protected]

4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
903-792-2022



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) se
#27
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Why thank you Rodolfo. This stuff is a passion, a love, and just fun. It is
so rewarding to see a customer light up when they experience something
better. I always tell my staff a great salesman is a great teacher. Show,
teach what is better and the prospective customer will always come back and
buy.

TVs are commodity biz, like anything. Fortunately, the quality of video is
far improved over NTSC, allowing for quality in video, something not before
had as we have in audio (do I hear guns loading now?). When 4k comes in 4-7
years, we will see even more. Then, if we are alive, 16k will rock the
world. Unfortunately, I either will not be here, or too blind for
holography, but Dolly Parton reruns should be a good source material for
evaluation.

Point is, only some people care about performance. The rest, about a deal,
meaning how much can they get off, not what its worth. So, no matter where
the price starts, they gotta deal. If you ever work retail Rodolfo, size up
the customer, and if he is one of those, start high and give him a "deal".
Or just tell him to go elsewhere, as I gently imply, because he will likely
be a long term hemorrhoid!

But among us, quality matters, and we are the ones that cause mfgs. to push
the envelope, especially the small, creative ones. So keep on pushing.

And remind me, what brand of plasma was that that had the tube front end
satge?



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 3:52 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joseph,

Good, it looks like you are actually doing what I suggested regarding
passing some savings to the consumer, and in your case even better because
you pass the savings even when you still give the advice and the effort.

I have to admit that there is one thing you said to me personally in one of
the last conferences that I take my hat off, there is no owner or manager of
ANY of the hi end places I am familiarized with that would do what you do:
"taking your staff to attend to real life acoustic musical events to let
them learn the inner details of musical instruments, their tones, harmonics,
musical arrangements, etc.

After all a good hi-end store should properly demo and sell high quality
electronic equipment to try to imitate as much as possible a real life
musical event, and any salesman should know what is the real thing before
they can demo how each amp or speaker can convey the musical inner details
differently, to the same ears, and been able to explain it.

Exactly the same should apply to HDTV, many do not even know how a properly
ISF calibrated set looks like, and many do not even know what ISF is.

On my other email I mentioned about stores and consumers being lost in
differentiating between quality and not, and that might be a driver for
looking for rock bottom prices on buying anything, but many years ago I
thought that by now, one year before flicking the switch out of analog TV,
would be much better than what it is.

Ironically, the situation now is similar than when I wrote the following
article 4 years ago for another HDTV magazine about the same subject, there
is no much improvement on the human part, other than the abundance of HD
panels on the showroom and hi def DVD as source in some individual demos,
the increase was in the Internet information, online stores, forums, actual
owners detailing experiences, etc.

http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/20 ... _be_prepar
ed_to_select_the_one_for_you.php

This reminds me of the changes the car dealership industry suffered since
the Internet is now the source of research for most car buyers before they
get to a showroom, if they get to a showroom. Those buyers research all the
options, the dealer cost of each of them, the dealer and manufacturer
discounts, and compare between online and brick and mortar dealers; when
they enter the showroom the negotiation starts from the dealer-cost up
rather than sticker-window down as it use to be.

It seems your store might deserve the "queen" status, at lest for hi end
audio.

By the way, we better do not touch the subject of the virtues of vinyl, tube
amps, and stands "for the cables not to touch the floor", because our good
friend Robert F. might suffer a temporary increase in blood pressure after
his last comment about the subject. Who knows? He might be pushed to admit
that the thousands of laserdiscs jackets displayed on the full wall of his
HT are actually "vinyl LPs" and the $25K turntable is not shown on the his
web site.

Take care Joseph.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:23 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Damn, where is that queen? Is it a real female, or just a drag one? When you
find the queen around here, parade that sucker by, Rodolfo. In the meantime,
your son and I can check out the ones in LV!

My local repair company informs me of good vs. junk stuff, gear they will
take, gear they would rather not, and gear that I can just go throw in the
river as they never want to see it. That article came from them, and they
are quite competent, ISF, and old timers in the biz.

Unfortunately, it is hard to know all about all video. Even you struggle to
know whats what. We try at my store and do a satisfactory job, even though
half of us are really stereo music lovers and can give you a real ear
education. I may even give you a turntable ed if I can ever find time to sit
down and write the course material.

Surprise! We sell Panny and Pioneer for the same, or less than the big guys.
Yep. You heard right. The 5000ex and pro hd1 we sell for $2999. We sell the
1080 50" Kuro for $500 or more less than BB. We do not get rich like this,
but make a decent profit, yet more importantly, take care of our customers.
I allow calls to my mobile up to midnight, and even had one Thanksgiving
that I solved via phone. But it was a national emergency: football day!

I know the small stores like mine are disappearing rapidly, and what a
shame! However, with the housing crisis, I hear from reps the appointment
only and trunk slammers are also disappearing. I do believe that our retail
biz will again grow due to the need for somewhere to call for real info and
help. Get them all day: "I can't get my _____ to work. What do I do?"

"Yes, where did you buy it? Have you tried calling them?"

"Yes, but they can't help me. They don't seem to know."

At that point I suggest a either a service call at hourly rates, to include
our learning time on gear we do not sell, or take it back and come buy from
us at the same price for better gear.

My point is we are losing specialists in many fields, not only audio/video.
When is the last time you saw a good photo shop, one that can help you buy a
good film or electronic camera? By not patronizing craftsmen, we lose them,
and ultimately hurt ourselves. One of the big problems for high end guys is
the lack of showrooms and intelligent sales personnel for their product. The
internet serves them poorly, and you too for truly purchasing correctly.

As one customer just told one of our staff, why would I want to buy from the
internet or appointment only? I want to try it and have some one who can
help anytime after I buy it.





-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:38 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,

I understand your valid concern.

When VHS was preferred was not for quality either, when LCD was preferred
was not for quality either. Massive amounts of people buy those, and many
of those do not even care for your store type.

That wheel is running since hi-fi was invented and the Internet and Costco
type shifted the savings with lower prices to the buyer, not to the salesman
that in most cases is poorly informed, and have done nothing other than
pointing to a floor sample they do not even know or properly calibrate for
proper presentation and comparison.

Many times I go to hi and low end stores to listen to the gross errors and
misinformation their ignorance fills consumers heads, then I take those
consumers to the side, present myself, and give them true knowledge, free.

Your store might be different, but I could not find one in ten years of HDTV
that really knew well the technology and the products, I make them pass all
kinds of tests, and 99% of them fail, and with a face of confidence.

That is the state of business.

You have not provided a source for the Vizio "junk" issue, other than the
article that talks about warranties for tier levels. Those will always
exist. Out of warranty tier 1 also makes people pay for all the expenses,
and they are not cheap, so this is pay now or pay later, and most prefer the
"pay-later" chance because they might be lucky and actually "pay-never", and
the money is in their pocket since day one.

When a plasma sells for hundreds to a $1000 less on Costco or the Internet
than in the brick and mortar uninformed place, that by itself pays for many
many years of extended warranty if that is the buyer's concern.
Joe-six-pack has the choice to buy the warranty with that saving or use the
money for a whole surround system, cabinets, etc.

In other words, how to spend the saving is on the consumer control, not as
an inaccessible commission in the salesmen pocket that no even know the
products they sell; and those are not only the BB and CC type, but also hi
end places that charge full MSRP and believe they are the Queen of HDTV.

The way I see it is simple, the value added service/knowledge a good store
can give to a consumer has become now too expensive by current standards
compared to alternative markets anyone has access to, which means that
survival without knowledge and sensitive overhead cost could not be
possible.

Look at it from another angle, if an informed consumer gets into those
stores, ignores the uninformed salesmen, points to a product and just signs
the check and leave, the store does not pass the value of the not provided
effort as a saving to the consumer, maybe they should start to do that in a
flexible way at the moment of negotiating the sale.

So it comes to "who controls the savings", and consumers will always try to
control the savings, especially when they are large, they have done the
research already, and the store has done nothing regarding advice, even when
they know that a Vizio is inferior to a Panasonic.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:39 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Read this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107

Buying junk products like Vizio continues to create a demand for junk and
not push the technology envelope. In other words, why should anyone do much
to develop new, better gear when down and dirty pricing is the king? Fujitsu
is exiting the flat screen market and they had done much to advance the
state of the art.

Buying junk makes us our own worse enemy. Buying from big box stores rather
than caring, knowledgeable dealers eliminates not only knowledge and service
for us, but outlets for better technology from enlightened mfgs. Better
costs not much more, and it lasts, saving us money, and makes us happier
with better performance.

Why even buy poor performance?




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Rodolfo La Maestra
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:11 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----


As with most manufacturers and models, and especially those on the rock
bottom pricing range, you will find a mixed bag of owners that are happy
with their sets as well as others that had problems with it. Just a quick
look at the Internet zoos would confirm the sides of the pie.

In fact, that also applies to almost all products out there, regardless of
how much you pay. We just had an exchange about a few disappointing company
decisions on a hi-end Casablanca pre/pro audio piece for $17,000, I own one
and I have to deal with the situation in an intelligent way no matter how
much anger could I have, and I still recommend the piece because of its
unmatched audio quality.

Customer service, repair, knowledgeable sales staff, is full of holes all
over the industry, whether is sold by Costco or by Harvey, which is now in
chapter 11 after the failed merger with Myer Emco. Both companies with
similar interests of quality service.

http://www.twice.com/article/CA6515615. ... c=topstory

In other words, nothing is perfect, and in such mess, telling someone to
consider a lower cost product when no budget is available is perhaps the
only idea that could become an option on an empty wallet.

When I said "consider" I was thinking on the main driver that Robert had:
"no budget", which could create the potential that he would not have a set
at all, if we just push for the best out there and ignore his reality.

Regarding the position of Vizio in the industry, they did a presentation at
Display Search in one of the last HDTV conferences I attended, and after a
low-key down-the-earth presentation of what they do to the market so any
Joe-six-pack can have the dream panel, not one person criticized the parts,
the service, the approach, the consumer satisfaction, etc, it was quite the
opposite, all from an exclusive audience of HDTV professionals from every
part of the industry, including retail.

Vizio reached the #1 selling panel company above Samsung until recently.

Here is some of what they do for the mass market, to have access to panels
that otherwise people could not buy:

http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/mo ... 295013.php

http://www.bigpicturebigsound.com/vizio ... -946.shtml

http://www.avrev.com/news/0307/20.viziogrows032.shtml

Vizio, as anyone else could have its bad side, it all depends on each
person, each case, and against what you compare, on equal terms.

Please be sure to understand that I am not endorsing Vizio, I endorse
Pioneer Elite and Panasonic plasmas, but I am just thinking in perspective,
I have my wallet empty and have to take Robert out to get 'the" TV he needs
to just watch something at home, and he is looking for a plasma, so I offer
that option, among others.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts. That's
how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If I
can find the article, I will forward.

6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
the more profitable one?

9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these differences.
Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-Fhd1
is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.

10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it. but
never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
about that.

See you guys at CES!




-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Richard Fisher
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails

Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Robert,
>
> 1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
> anything of that loss.
>
> 2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
> would check their policy as well.
>
> 3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
> competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
> there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
> notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times the
> main issue of disappointment.
>
> 4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
> lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
> introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
not
> do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
itself
> you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
> well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
> half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>
> 5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
> 720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>
> 6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
you
> evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of image
> setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like) on
> color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
> material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
pixel
> structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
analog
> CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
issue
> with time.
>
> 7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
(in
> that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
compromising
> quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>
> 8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
price
> quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the market
> for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
> you.
>
> 9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
with
> the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
have
> a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
> probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
processing,
> XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
> words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
display
> the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
won't.
>
> 10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than the
> barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps you
> should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
in
> my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>
> 11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you had
> was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
they
> are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the best
> price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
you
> do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
> research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>
> I hope this helps Robert.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> 12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>
> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
> tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
> to explain.
>
> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
> replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>
> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>
> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
> 50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>
> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
> and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>
> Advice please.
> Best,
> Robert B
>
> 4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
> 903-792-2022
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
2:02 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#28
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Bob,

I'll back up Joe and I am in the service business.

Counterfiets can range from actual counterfiets to pilfered defective
stock. The scuttle butt is the chinese got a hold of some IC
manufacturing equipment and rogues started making counterfiet versions
of popular failure parts. Some Sanyo series STK higlights for CRT RP...

STK392-110
STK392-020
STK392-040

With these they either fail on the spot, don't work right or fail
prematurely. Ran into a horizontal output that prematurely failed,
suspecting my supplier I ordered an OEM and they clearly looked different.

Electronic parts are a commodity market as well with a myriad of
suppliers buying and selling across the planet in huge quantities. IT is
an easy avenue for rogue suppliers to get into. I suspect to this day
that Hitachi bought huge lot from a rogue supplier a few years because
the ICs were clearly failing, dropping like flies prematurely and my
bonafide replacements changed the response - a typical response with
conterfiets versus the real mccoy.



Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Joseph Azar wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Bob,
>
> I have the article somewhere, an engineering mag that showed chips
> repackaged as another. If I find it and a link, I will send it, but it
> surprised me to see this.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Bob Mankin
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 11:57 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> The conspiracy theories are getting a little ahead of themselves. While I
> don't disagree with your quality concerns over lesser known brands,
> suggestions of counterfeiting parts are getting out there. If anyone can
> provide me with an example of a video chip that has been reverse engineered
> or "counterfeited" via some other means, I would be amazed as I don't
> believe that is technically possible.
>
> Keep in mind that all manufacturers have some sort of failure rate. Even the
> linked blog includes several references to just that as well as corrections
> for misinformation about warranty claims for larger sets on the lesser
> brands.
>
> Anybody remember Goldstar products? I do. I considered them junk. They are
> now known as LG Electronics and I would say some of their stuff today is
> pretty darn good. So are Vizio, Oleivia and the like going through the same
> growing pains that Goldstar once did?
>
> BTW, you'll find that many of the off brand sets go down the assembly lines
> in the same factories as the big name brands. Find out for yourself who
> makes Insignia. The world runs on contract manufacturing these days.
>
> The reality is Sony's move is a business decision, all about the bottom
> line. As video/audiophiles, don't let your wishes and informed perspectives
> blind you to thinking better quality first and foremost in the Board room.
> Do those Execs make a product line decision that caters to the videophile
> and sell 100k units or does he gamble with a lesser quality product with a
> lower price point that sells to a million Joe Sixpacks? The decisions are no
> mystery when you put them in those terms.
>
> Bob
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>>Behalf Of Joseph Azar
>>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
>>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>>
>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>>Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
>>That's
>>how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
>>There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
>>another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
>>work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If
>>I
>>can find the article, I will forward.
>>
>>6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
>>Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
>>the more profitable one?
>>
>>9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
>>differences.
>>Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-
>>Fhd1
>>is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
>>
>>10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
>>better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
>>but
>>never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
>>about that.
>>
>>See you guys at CES!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>>Behalf Of Richard Fisher
>>Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
>>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>>
>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>>7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
>>
>>Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
>>seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
>>
>>Richard Fisher
>>ISF and HAA certified
>>HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>
>>Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
>>
>>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>>Robert,
>>>
>>>1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
>>>anything of that loss.
>>>
>>>2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
>>>would check their policy as well.
>>>
>>>3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
>>>competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
>>>there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
>>>notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
>>
>>the
>>
>>>main issue of disappointment.
>>>
>>>4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
>>>lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
>>>introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
>>
>>not
>>
>>>do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
>>
>>itself
>>
>>>you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
>>>well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
>>>half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>>>
>>>5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
>>>720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>>>
>>>6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
>>
>>you
>>
>>>evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of
>>
>>image
>>
>>>setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
>>
>>on
>>
>>>color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
>>>material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
>>
>>pixel
>>
>>>structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
>>
>>analog
>>
>>>CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
>>
>>issue
>>
>>>with time.
>>>
>>>7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
>>
>>(in
>>
>>>that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
>>
>>compromising
>>
>>>quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>>>
>>>8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
>>
>>price
>>
>>>quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the
>>
>>market
>>
>>>for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
>>>you.
>>>
>>>9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
>>
>>with
>>
>>>the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
>>
>>have
>>
>>>a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
>>>probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
>>
>>processing,
>>
>>>XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
>>>words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
>>
>>display
>>
>>>the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
>>
>>won't.
>>
>>>10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
>>
>>the
>>
>>>barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps
>>
>>you
>>
>>>should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
>>
>>in
>>
>>>my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>>>
>>>11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
>>
>>had
>>
>>>was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
>>
>>they
>>
>>>are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the
>>
>>best
>>
>>>price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
>>
>>you
>>
>>>do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
>>>research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>>>
>>>I hope this helps Robert.
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>
>>>Rodolfo La Maestra
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>>>Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
>>>Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
>>>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>>>Subject: Lost among Choices
>>>
>>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>>12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>>>
>>> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
>>>tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
>>>to explain.
>>>
>>> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
>>>replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
>>> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
>>> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>>>
>>> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>>>
>>> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
>>>50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>>>
>>> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
>>>and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>>>
>>> Advice please.
>>>Best,
>>>Robert B
>>>
>>>4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
>>>903-792-2022
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>
>>same
>>
>>>day) send an email to:
>>>[email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>
>>same
>>day) send an email to:
>>
>>>[email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date: 12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#29
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

>From what I remember, Samsung chips were the most counterfeited. Basically,
they are repackaged by new encapsulation and remarked. Like Richard says,
more problems are to be had, including major ones of fire hazard. Though a
better mfg. would hopefully test and examine well, stuff can still sneak in.
Imagine then, the low cost guys. They are looking for every advantage they
can get.

A penny saved, 10 million times, is a lot. Multiply that by all the others
saved, and we are talking money!


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Richard Fisher
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 8:32 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Bob,

I'll back up Joe and I am in the service business.

Counterfiets can range from actual counterfiets to pilfered defective
stock. The scuttle butt is the chinese got a hold of some IC
manufacturing equipment and rogues started making counterfiet versions
of popular failure parts. Some Sanyo series STK higlights for CRT RP...

STK392-110
STK392-020
STK392-040

With these they either fail on the spot, don't work right or fail
prematurely. Ran into a horizontal output that prematurely failed,
suspecting my supplier I ordered an OEM and they clearly looked different.

Electronic parts are a commodity market as well with a myriad of
suppliers buying and selling across the planet in huge quantities. IT is
an easy avenue for rogue suppliers to get into. I suspect to this day
that Hitachi bought huge lot from a rogue supplier a few years because
the ICs were clearly failing, dropping like flies prematurely and my
bonafide replacements changed the response - a typical response with
conterfiets versus the real mccoy.



Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Joseph Azar wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Bob,
>
> I have the article somewhere, an engineering mag that showed chips
> repackaged as another. If I find it and a link, I will send it, but it
> surprised me to see this.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Bob Mankin
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 11:57 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> The conspiracy theories are getting a little ahead of themselves. While I
> don't disagree with your quality concerns over lesser known brands,
> suggestions of counterfeiting parts are getting out there. If anyone can
> provide me with an example of a video chip that has been reverse
engineered
> or "counterfeited" via some other means, I would be amazed as I don't
> believe that is technically possible.
>
> Keep in mind that all manufacturers have some sort of failure rate. Even
the
> linked blog includes several references to just that as well as
corrections
> for misinformation about warranty claims for larger sets on the lesser
> brands.
>
> Anybody remember Goldstar products? I do. I considered them junk. They are
> now known as LG Electronics and I would say some of their stuff today is
> pretty darn good. So are Vizio, Oleivia and the like going through the
same
> growing pains that Goldstar once did?
>
> BTW, you'll find that many of the off brand sets go down the assembly
lines
> in the same factories as the big name brands. Find out for yourself who
> makes Insignia. The world runs on contract manufacturing these days.
>
> The reality is Sony's move is a business decision, all about the bottom
> line. As video/audiophiles, don't let your wishes and informed
perspectives
> blind you to thinking better quality first and foremost in the Board room.
> Do those Execs make a product line decision that caters to the videophile
> and sell 100k units or does he gamble with a lesser quality product with a
> lower price point that sells to a million Joe Sixpacks? The decisions are
no
> mystery when you put them in those terms.
>
> Bob
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>>Behalf Of Joseph Azar
>>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
>>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>>
>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>>Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
>>That's
>>how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
>>There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
>>another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
>>work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If
>>I
>>can find the article, I will forward.
>>
>>6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
>>Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
>>the more profitable one?
>>
>>9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
>>differences.
>>Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-
>>Fhd1
>>is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
>>
>>10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
>>better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
>>but
>>never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
>>about that.
>>
>>See you guys at CES!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>>Behalf Of Richard Fisher
>>Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
>>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>>
>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>>7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
>>
>>Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
>>seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
>>
>>Richard Fisher
>>ISF and HAA certified
>>HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>
>>Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
>>
>>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>>Robert,
>>>
>>>1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
>>>anything of that loss.
>>>
>>>2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
>>>would check their policy as well.
>>>
>>>3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
>>>competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
>>>there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
>>>notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
>>
>>the
>>
>>>main issue of disappointment.
>>>
>>>4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
>>>lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
>>>introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
>>
>>not
>>
>>>do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
>>
>>itself
>>
>>>you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
>>>well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
>>>half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>>>
>>>5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
>>>720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>>>
>>>6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
>>
>>you
>>
>>>evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of
>>
>>image
>>
>>>setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
>>
>>on
>>
>>>color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
>>>material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
>>
>>pixel
>>
>>>structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
>>
>>analog
>>
>>>CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
>>
>>issue
>>
>>>with time.
>>>
>>>7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
>>
>>(in
>>
>>>that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
>>
>>compromising
>>
>>>quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>>>
>>>8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
>>
>>price
>>
>>>quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the
>>
>>market
>>
>>>for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
>>>you.
>>>
>>>9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
>>
>>with
>>
>>>the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
>>
>>have
>>
>>>a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
>>>probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
>>
>>processing,
>>
>>>XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
>>>words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
>>
>>display
>>
>>>the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
>>
>>won't.
>>
>>>10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
>>
>>the
>>
>>>barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps
>>
>>you
>>
>>>should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
>>
>>in
>>
>>>my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>>>
>>>11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
>>
>>had
>>
>>>was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
>>
>>they
>>
>>>are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the
>>
>>best
>>
>>>price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
>>
>>you
>>
>>>do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
>>>research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>>>
>>>I hope this helps Robert.
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>
>>>Rodolfo La Maestra
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>>>Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
>>>Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
>>>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>>>Subject: Lost among Choices
>>>
>>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>>12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>>>
>>> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
>>>tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
>>>to explain.
>>>
>>> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
>>>replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
>>> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
>>> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>>>
>>> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>>>
>>> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
>>>50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>>>
>>> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
>>>and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>>>
>>> Advice please.
>>>Best,
>>>Robert B
>>>
>>>4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
>>>903-792-2022
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>
>>same
>>
>>>day) send an email to:
>>>[email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>
>>same
>>day) send an email to:
>>
>>>[email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#30
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

In such case, considering that Sanyo, Hitachi, Samsung and the others are
not lower class tier 2, such as the Vizio, if all those manufacturers use
questionable parts, the "junk risk" to consumers should be applicable to any
product and manufacturer, and a lower price product could be favored when
all in the market are subjected to the same situation.

Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Joseph Azar
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 1:23 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

>From what I remember, Samsung chips were the most counterfeited. Basically,
they are repackaged by new encapsulation and remarked. Like Richard says,
more problems are to be had, including major ones of fire hazard. Though a
better mfg. would hopefully test and examine well, stuff can still sneak in.
Imagine then, the low cost guys. They are looking for every advantage they
can get.

A penny saved, 10 million times, is a lot. Multiply that by all the others
saved, and we are talking money!


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Richard Fisher
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 8:32 PM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: Lost among Choices

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Bob,

I'll back up Joe and I am in the service business.

Counterfiets can range from actual counterfiets to pilfered defective
stock. The scuttle butt is the chinese got a hold of some IC
manufacturing equipment and rogues started making counterfiet versions
of popular failure parts. Some Sanyo series STK higlights for CRT RP...

STK392-110
STK392-020
STK392-040

With these they either fail on the spot, don't work right or fail
prematurely. Ran into a horizontal output that prematurely failed,
suspecting my supplier I ordered an OEM and they clearly looked different.

Electronic parts are a commodity market as well with a myriad of
suppliers buying and selling across the planet in huge quantities. IT is
an easy avenue for rogue suppliers to get into. I suspect to this day
that Hitachi bought huge lot from a rogue supplier a few years because
the ICs were clearly failing, dropping like flies prematurely and my
bonafide replacements changed the response - a typical response with
conterfiets versus the real mccoy.



Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Joseph Azar wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Bob,
>
> I have the article somewhere, an engineering mag that showed chips
> repackaged as another. If I find it and a link, I will send it, but it
> surprised me to see this.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Bob Mankin
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 11:57 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> The conspiracy theories are getting a little ahead of themselves. While I
> don't disagree with your quality concerns over lesser known brands,
> suggestions of counterfeiting parts are getting out there. If anyone can
> provide me with an example of a video chip that has been reverse
engineered
> or "counterfeited" via some other means, I would be amazed as I don't
> believe that is technically possible.
>
> Keep in mind that all manufacturers have some sort of failure rate. Even
the
> linked blog includes several references to just that as well as
corrections
> for misinformation about warranty claims for larger sets on the lesser
> brands.
>
> Anybody remember Goldstar products? I do. I considered them junk. They are
> now known as LG Electronics and I would say some of their stuff today is
> pretty darn good. So are Vizio, Oleivia and the like going through the
same
> growing pains that Goldstar once did?
>
> BTW, you'll find that many of the off brand sets go down the assembly
lines
> in the same factories as the big name brands. Find out for yourself who
> makes Insignia. The world runs on contract manufacturing these days.
>
> The reality is Sony's move is a business decision, all about the bottom
> line. As video/audiophiles, don't let your wishes and informed
perspectives
> blind you to thinking better quality first and foremost in the Board room.
> Do those Execs make a product line decision that caters to the videophile
> and sell 100k units or does he gamble with a lesser quality product with a
> lower price point that sells to a million Joe Sixpacks? The decisions are
no
> mystery when you put them in those terms.
>
> Bob
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>>Behalf Of Joseph Azar
>>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3:43 AM
>>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>>
>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>>Vizio is junk, period. Lousy picture, lousy manufacture, lousy parts.
>>That's
>>how they keep the price so cheap. Who even knows if the parts are legit.
>>There is counterfeiting in parts too, chips labeled as one thing but are
>>another. This is talked about in engineering mags, not consumer. They may
>>work, and within spec, but barely. They may also cause damage or fire. If
>>I
>>can find the article, I will forward.
>>
>>6) Wonder why a Samsung or LG plasma looks better some places than a
>>Pioneer? Ever heard of spiffs and kickbacks? Why not set one worse to sell
>>the more profitable one?
>>
>>9) I don't believe a good Pioneer 1080 set would not show these
>>differences.
>>Try it on a 5000EX or Pro-FHD1, both being the same set except the Pro-
>>Fhd1
>>is the Elite set (odd being called Pro) and a grand more.
>>
>>10) The best blacks yes, but sometimes too much. Though I have not seen
>>better elsewhere, I am not sure gradation steps are linear as I view it.
>>but
>>never have I seen any measurements on linearity either, and no one talks
>>about that.
>>
>>See you guys at CES!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>>Behalf Of Richard Fisher
>>Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:05 PM
>>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>>Subject: Re: Lost among Choices
>>
>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>>7) the Vizio - poor service and repair if it fails
>>
>>Being on a budget is going to be tough for the performance you are
>>seeking... Rodolfo has pointed the way if you can find the money.
>>
>>Richard Fisher
>>ISF and HAA certified
>>HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>
>>Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
>>
>>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>>Robert,
>>>
>>>1) I would check first with your home insurance to verify if they cover
>>>anything of that loss.
>>>
>>>2) If you used a power conditioner such Panamax, Monster, or the like, I
>>>would check their policy as well.
>>>
>>>3) CRT HD was probably the more eye-appealing image compared to the
>>>competitor technologies, so there is a reason to get to like it. On CRT
>>>there is no pixel structure, on 720p plasma that is the first you will
>>>notice if you are close enough. Two different animals, and many times
>>
>>the
>>
>>>main issue of disappointment.
>>>
>>>4) The horizontal resolution of your CRT set was probably well below 900
>>>lines (measured left to right, to what I can recall when that set was
>>>introduced in 1999), but almost everyone else on the CRT category would
>>
>>not
>>
>>>do much better. Out of a total 1920 left to right on the 1080i signal
>>
>>itself
>>
>>>you were missing quite a chunk of horizontal resolution (and vertical as
>>>well), but the CRT technology was so forgiving that even when showing at
>>>half resolution the HD images look pristine.
>>>
>>>5) You will NOT find that virtue on fixed pixel displays, especially the
>>>720p oriented sets, which are limited to about 1300+ (768x1366 in many).
>>>
>>>6) Retail floors are still idiotic regarding proper settings. Make sure
>>
>>you
>>
>>>evaluate the plasma sets with the contrast down, no "Vivid" type of
>>
>>image
>>
>>>setting, neutral settings for color, tint, etc , standard (or the like)
>>
>>on
>>
>>>color temperature, and view them about 3 to 4 times their height on HD
>>>material (more for SD). Even with that adjustment you might still see
>>
>>pixel
>>
>>>structure which could make it unappealing compared to the softness of
>>
>>analog
>>
>>>CRT tubes, but the other virtues of plasma will make you forgive that
>>
>>issue
>>
>>>with time.
>>>
>>>7) When quality is the driver I normally recommend Pioneer or Panasonic
>>
>>(in
>>
>>>that order), but since you are looking for a good price without
>>
>>compromising
>>
>>>quality I would consider a Vizio panel.
>>>
>>>8) For 2008 it was predicted that 720p plasma panels would go down in
>>
>>price
>>
>>>quite considerably, so if I would be you I would be monitoring the
>>
>>market
>>
>>>for a while if you can wait, especially because price is of a concern to
>>>you.
>>>
>>>9) Do not be concern with HDMI 1.3 on the display, but be more concern
>>
>>with
>>
>>>the number of HDMI inputs (of any version) on the display if you do not
>>
>>have
>>
>>>a switcher or A/V receiver doing the switching. The plasma set would
>>>probably not have the ability to deal with the higher bit video
>>
>>processing,
>>
>>>XVColor, Deep Color, etc. brought by the ability of HDMI 1.3. In other
>>>words, receiving/accepting a level of HDMI does not mean the set can
>>
>>display
>>
>>>the higher capabilities of the connection, and in most cases (95%) it
>>
>>won't.
>>
>>>10) 1080p will cost you but will give you 2 million pixels rather than
>>
>>the
>>
>>>barely 1 million of a 720p panel, so if image is your concern perhaps
>>
>>you
>>
>>>should also compare with the new Pannys or Pioneer Kuro (the best blacks
>>
>>in
>>
>>>my opinion, which also gives you better color depth).
>>>
>>>11) If you have the space, and I assume you do because the RCA set you
>>
>>had
>>
>>>was quite a real state eater on depth, consider DLP or LCoS RPTV while
>>
>>they
>>
>>>are still alive, they are 1080p, they are now what CRT RPTV was, the
>>
>>best
>>
>>>price for size deal, if you do not mind "wobulation" in DLP RPTVs DMDs,
>>
>>you
>>
>>>do not see the rainbow effect in DLP color wheel, and if you do good
>>>research with the LCoS set you choose to avoid some lemons out there.
>>>
>>>I hope this helps Robert.
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>
>>>Rodolfo La Maestra
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>>>Behalf Of Robert Wade Brown
>>>Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 PM
>>>To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>>>Subject: Lost among Choices
>>>
>>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>>12/27/2007 2:59pm ct
>>>
>>> I have a 6.5 year-old RCA HD 38" 1080i model F38310 (CRT
>>>tube) which was blown out by a city power failure restart we have yet
>>>to explain.
>>>
>>> I've found that the 2 Plasma (below) sets I've trialed to
>>>replace it are not as good quality a picture as I am used to:
>>> Samsung HPTA4254 42" 720p Plasma
>>> LG 42PC1DA 42" 720p Plasma
>>>
>>> Is this because I'm used to CRT ?
>>>
>>> I'm told that the next best step up is the Samsung FPT5084
>>>50" 1080p Plasma HDTV
>>>
>>> Obviously, I'd like to move to a better picture and 1080p
>>>and HDMI 1.3, but I have an almost non-existant budget.
>>>
>>> Advice please.
>>>Best,
>>>Robert B
>>>
>>>4106 Texas Blvd Texarkana, TX 75503-3011 voice 903-792-2020 fax
>>>903-792-2022
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>
>>same
>>
>>>day) send an email to:
>>>[email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>
>>same
>>day) send an email to:
>>
>>>[email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
>>12/22/2007
>>2:02 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
>>day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1193 - Release Date:
12/22/2007
> 2:02 PM
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1202 - Release Date: 12/29/2007
1:27 PM



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]