More channels for Robert?

Started by Rodolfo Jan 18, 2007 20 posts
Read-only archive
#1
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Robert,

I am sure you know this.

6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
any form.

The matrix for the back is similar to what Dolby Prologic does for decades
with front L/R to derive the center front, in fact you can even get an old
Prologic pre/amp and use it just for the center back to extract the common
signal from L/R rear surrounds and create a fuller sound image across the
back, while on suitable discrete content the speaker can be used for its own
directional soundtrack channel.

Herby Hancock demo of 10.1 was great a couple of years ago on the hi-end
audio section of the Alexis at CES but I do not see that format flying to
consumers anytime soon.

The ceiling speaker I am talking about is actually a 8.1 system that
reproduces soundtrack height directional sound located above the audience
heads between the front center and the back center (if present). There was
at least one war movie created with such channel a few years ago, but you
can still create you own Prologic decoding between the center front/back
speakers in a similar fashion to the above to bring to that height/ceiling
speaker only those sounds that are common between those two center channels,
usually the panning sounds of objects moving front/back/front over the heads
of the audience, a helicopter, an airplane, etc., when the object fully
moves to the front or back the common sound drops from either speaker and
the decoder would automatically make it drop from the ceiling.

Then you install floor transducers across the room, and a D-Box system on
the seating area, and the only thing is left is converting your theater
seats into beds, a king size bed of course, I am almost there already.

In other words, HDHT never ends.


Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
Robert A Fowkes
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:34 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: Cinemascope in HD, brief response to Robert

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Rodolfo,

At 01:56 AM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>We have the same illness Robert, I have not seen yet half of the movies I
>bought.

Understood (from a personal perspective). I'll temper our affliction
a bit by mentioning that the reason that I haven't "watched" a lot of
what I've purposed is because the content involves classic movies
that I've already seen and want to own (and sometimes I watch the
extras first), or the same with classic television (if that's not an
oxymoron <g>).

>Remember when each of those LDs were $50 a piece, talking about sw
>investment for just non-anamorphic NTSC letterbox.

You're talking to the king of the $125 Criterion Boxed Set. Of
course at $99 from a vendor like Ken Crane's we thought, at the time,
we were getting a tremendous bargain.


>You do not have a center back surround? Man, your theater is incomplete!!
>Just kidding.

I know that 10.1 sound (and beyond) is probably on the way but by
that time my brain will probably have lost the ability to process
directionality.

Take care.

-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#2
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>Robert,
>
>I am sure you know this.
>
>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>any form.

Rodolfo,

Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
-- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
content. My sound system has never sounded so good.

I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
concentrate on HD media.


-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#3
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

.1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!


Are we talking overkill here?

Larry



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
Robert A Fowkes
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>Robert,
>
>I am sure you know this.
>
>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>any form.

Rodolfo,

Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
-- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
content. My sound system has never sounded so good.

I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
concentrate on HD media.


-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#4
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Depends on how they are implemented...

Richard Fisher
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Larry Megugorac wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>
>
> Are we talking overkill here?
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
> Robert A Fowkes
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>Robert,
>>
>>I am sure you know this.
>>
>>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>>any form.
>
>
> Rodolfo,
>
> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>
> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
> concentrate on HD media.
>
>
> -- RAF
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#5
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

At 04:46 AM 1/19/2007 -0800, you wrote:
>.1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>
>
>Are we talking overkill here?

Actually, I'm currently using two subwoofers in my system so the .1
might be a bit of a misnomer (7.2? <g>) although both subs are
receiving the same information. I purchased an M&K MX-350 subwoofer
when I purchased my regular speakers (also M&K). When SVS entered
the field I couldn't resist the added low end it provided so, for a
time, I used both subs. Then I upgraded to an SVS PC Ultra and found
that it actually sounded better on its own. A good friend, Peter
Tribeman of Outlaw, Atlantic Technologies (and other firms over the
years) introduced me to the Velodyne SMS-1 ("Subwoofer Management
System") and this rather remarkable product actually flattened out my
room response even more at the low end of things by providing
automatic equalization and adjustment for a multi-sub setup. I
wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't heard it with my own
ears. It's one of the nicer "boxes" that I've added to my HT.
Incidentally, the same electronics are now included in many subs in
the Velodyne line and I would expect that other manufacturers offer
similar sub equalization circuits although I haven't researched this
fully. If I haven't bored you to tears already, here's something I
wrote describing my subsonic "epiphany": http://www.rfowkes.com/html/sms-1.html

In other words, I no longer consider more than one subwoofer as
overkill if done properly. I still am holding on to an older SVS sub
cylinder until my son is ready for it and I've been tempted to add it
to the mix (the SMS-1 will handle up to three subs without any
expansion modules) but space constraints in my HT get in the
way. What I have now sounds excellent - and even more so with new
codecs delivering a 6.9Mbps bit rate.


-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#6
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

At 03:05 PM 1/19/2007 +0000, you wrote:
>The age old practice of always placing one sub in the corner of the room is
>closer to producing real "overkill." This practice can produce enormous
>increases in bass energy, at certain frequencies, in specific seating
>locations in the room. The practice can also produce dramatic suckouts of
>certain bass frequencies in specific locations. A fundamental understanding
>of room resonances in the bass region of frequencies is the key. This topic
>is too lengthy to explain adequately in this tips format. Dr. Floyd
>Toole has
>been promoting the proper use of 4 subs for several years now.


Forgive me for pointing out that I never thought I'd come across a
paragraph in the HD list that included both the words, "suckouts" and
"Toole." <g>

Just an observation from someone with obviously too much time on his
hands. TGIF!


-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#7
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Overkill? Absolutely not! Go back and read the explanation for proper
implementation of 4 subs. If the magazine does a capable job of explaining
the underlying principles, you will understand why. The technique is useful
for moderating bass peak and null distribution in a room with multiple
listening positions, such as a multi-seat home theater.

The age old practice of always placing one sub in the corner of the room is
closer to producing real "overkill." This practice can produce enormous
increases in bass energy, at certain frequencies, in specific seating
locations in the room. The practice can also produce dramatic suckouts of
certain bass frequencies in specific locations. A fundamental understanding
of room resonances in the bass region of frequencies is the key. This topic
is too lengthy to explain adequately in this tips format. Dr. Floyd Toole has
been promoting the proper use of 4 subs for several years now.

Best regards,
Alan Brown, President
CinemaQuest, Inc.
www.cinemaquestinc.com

> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> ..1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>
>
> Are we talking overkill here?
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
> Robert A Fowkes
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
> >Robert,
> >
> >I am sure you know this.
> >
> >6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
> >You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
> >present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
> >artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
> >surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
> >the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
> >any form.
>
> Rodolfo,
>
> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>
> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
> concentrate on HD media.
>
>
> -- RAF
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an
email to:
> [email protected]


---------------------------------------------
This message was sent using ViaWest's Vmail.
http://www.viawest.net/



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#8
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each speaker is
(except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?




-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Megugorac
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

.1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!


Are we talking overkill here?

Larry



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
Robert A Fowkes
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>Robert,
>
>I am sure you know this.
>
>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>any form.

Rodolfo,

Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
-- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
content. My sound system has never sounded so good.

I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
concentrate on HD media.


-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#9
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Alan,

Is "suckout" a technical term? :')

It must be Friday....that struck me as really funny. :')

Thanks to everyone for providing such high quality information to us tipsters!

I am anxiously awaiting a thorough review of the LG HD-DVD / BLU-Ray
player. If it performs well, I will jump in since I will no longer
need to worry about which faction may eventually win this format war.
Once onboard with a HD disc player, I will have to seriously consider
upgrading my receiver to a unit that has HDMI in so I can enjoy the
new audio codecs Robert is raving about.

Jeff

On 1/19/07, Joseph Azar <[email protected]> wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each speaker is
> (except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Megugorac
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>
>
> Are we talking overkill here?
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
> Robert A Fowkes
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
> >Robert,
> >
> >I am sure you know this.
> >
> >6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
> >You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
> >present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
> >artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
> >surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
> >the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
> >any form.
>
> Rodolfo,
>
> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>
> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
> concentrate on HD media.
>
>
> -- RAF
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#10
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

We have an article coming out about that. Not a thorough review. The LG
player is not a true combo player as it does not fully support HD DVD.
Yes, it plays back HD DVD content, but does not support PIP, HDi or have
network connectivity ... all of which are required to bear the HD DVD
logo and branding. Quite a let-down for $1200.

Shane Sturgeon


Jeff Odell wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Alan,
>
> Is "suckout" a technical term? :')
>
> It must be Friday....that struck me as really funny. :')
>
> Thanks to everyone for providing such high quality information to us
> tipsters!
>
> I am anxiously awaiting a thorough review of the LG HD-DVD / BLU-Ray
> player. If it performs well, I will jump in since I will no longer
> need to worry about which faction may eventually win this format war.
> Once onboard with a HD disc player, I will have to seriously consider
> upgrading my receiver to a unit that has HDMI in so I can enjoy the
> new audio codecs Robert is raving about.
>
> Jeff
>
> On 1/19/07, Joseph Azar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each
>> speaker is
>> (except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Larry Megugorac
>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>>
>>
>> Are we talking overkill here?
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On
>> Behalf Of Dr
>> Robert A Fowkes
>> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>> >Robert,
>> >
>> >I am sure you know this.
>> >
>> >6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while
>> already.
>> >You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>> >present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable
>> pre/pro/receiver will
>> >artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>> >surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will
>> send
>> >the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has
>> it in
>> >any form.
>>
>> Rodolfo,
>>
>> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
>> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
>> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
>> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
>> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
>> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
>> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
>> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
>> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
>> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
>> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
>> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
>> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
>> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
>> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
>> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
>> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
>> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
>> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
>> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
>> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
>> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
>> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>>
>> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
>> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
>> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
>> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
>> concentrate on HD media.
>>
>>
>> -- RAF
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date:
>> 1/18/2007
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date:
>> 1/18/2007
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#11
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Speaker location for optimum bass reproduction in a rectangular home theater
is quite different than optimum placement for the higher frequency
reproducers. That is one of the great advantages of using subwoofers for
film soundtrack reproduction. Non-directional low frequency sounds can be
sent to the sub(s), then sounds that are very directional can be sent to
speakers designed for and located ideally for such information.

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:39 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each speaker is
(except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?




-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Megugorac
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

.1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!


Are we talking overkill here?

Larry



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
Robert A Fowkes
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>Robert,
>
>I am sure you know this.
>
>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>any form.

Rodolfo,

Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
-- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
content. My sound system has never sounded so good.

I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
concentrate on HD media.


-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#12
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I'm always suspicious of anything LG does. I have seen a consistent pattern
of shortchanging the consumer in their designs, moreso than other
manufacturers.

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Shane Sturgeon
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 10:50 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

We have an article coming out about that. Not a thorough review. The LG
player is not a true combo player as it does not fully support HD DVD.
Yes, it plays back HD DVD content, but does not support PIP, HDi or have
network connectivity ... all of which are required to bear the HD DVD
logo and branding. Quite a let-down for $1200.

Shane Sturgeon


Jeff Odell wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Alan,
>
> Is "suckout" a technical term? :')
>
> It must be Friday....that struck me as really funny. :')
>
> Thanks to everyone for providing such high quality information to us
> tipsters!
>
> I am anxiously awaiting a thorough review of the LG HD-DVD / BLU-Ray
> player. If it performs well, I will jump in since I will no longer
> need to worry about which faction may eventually win this format war.
> Once onboard with a HD disc player, I will have to seriously consider
> upgrading my receiver to a unit that has HDMI in so I can enjoy the
> new audio codecs Robert is raving about.
>
> Jeff
>
> On 1/19/07, Joseph Azar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each
>> speaker is
>> (except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Larry Megugorac
>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>>
>>
>> Are we talking overkill here?
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On
>> Behalf Of Dr
>> Robert A Fowkes
>> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>> >Robert,
>> >
>> >I am sure you know this.
>> >
>> >6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while
>> already.
>> >You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>> >present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable
>> pre/pro/receiver will
>> >artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>> >surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will
>> send
>> >the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has
>> it in
>> >any form.
>>
>> Rodolfo,
>>
>> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
>> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
>> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
>> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
>> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
>> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
>> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
>> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
>> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
>> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
>> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
>> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
>> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
>> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
>> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
>> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
>> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
>> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
>> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
>> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
>> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
>> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
>> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>>
>> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
>> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
>> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
>> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
>> concentrate on HD media.
>>
>>
>> -- RAF
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date:
>> 1/18/2007
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date:
>> 1/18/2007
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#13
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Thanks Shane and Alan for your feedback. I don't want to compromise
on a player I hope to own for several years. I will continue to
watch for a player that supports both formats but doesn't compromise
on either (24 fps, advanced audio codecs, etc).

Jeff

On 1/19/07, Alan Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> I'm always suspicious of anything LG does. I have seen a consistent pattern
> of shortchanging the consumer in their designs, moreso than other
> manufacturers.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Shane Sturgeon
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 10:50 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> We have an article coming out about that. Not a thorough review. The LG
> player is not a true combo player as it does not fully support HD DVD.
> Yes, it plays back HD DVD content, but does not support PIP, HDi or have
> network connectivity ... all of which are required to bear the HD DVD
> logo and branding. Quite a let-down for $1200.
>
> Shane Sturgeon
>
>
> Jeff Odell wrote:
> > ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >
> > Alan,
> >
> > Is "suckout" a technical term? :')
> >
> > It must be Friday....that struck me as really funny. :')
> >
> > Thanks to everyone for providing such high quality information to us
> > tipsters!
> >
> > I am anxiously awaiting a thorough review of the LG HD-DVD / BLU-Ray
> > player. If it performs well, I will jump in since I will no longer
> > need to worry about which faction may eventually win this format war.
> > Once onboard with a HD disc player, I will have to seriously consider
> > upgrading my receiver to a unit that has HDMI in so I can enjoy the
> > new audio codecs Robert is raving about.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > On 1/19/07, Joseph Azar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each
> >> speaker is
> >> (except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Larry Megugorac
> >> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
> >> To: HDTV Magazine
> >> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
> >>
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
> >>
> >>
> >> Are we talking overkill here?
> >>
> >> Larry
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: HDTV Magazine On
> >> Behalf Of Dr
> >> Robert A Fowkes
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
> >> To: HDTV Magazine
> >> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
> >>
> >> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
> >>
> >> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
> >> >Robert,
> >> >
> >> >I am sure you know this.
> >> >
> >> >6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while
> >> already.
> >> >You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
> >> >present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable
> >> pre/pro/receiver will
> >> >artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
> >> >surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will
> >> send
> >> >the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has
> >> it in
> >> >any form.
> >>
> >> Rodolfo,
> >>
> >> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
> >> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
> >> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
> >> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
> >> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
> >> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
> >> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
> >> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
> >> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
> >> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
> >> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
> >> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
> >> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
> >> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
> >> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
> >> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
> >> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
> >> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
> >> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
> >> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
> >> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
> >> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
> >> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
> >>
> >> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
> >> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
> >> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
> >> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
> >> concentrate on HD media.
> >>
> >>
> >> -- RAF
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> >> day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same
> >> day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date:
> >> 1/18/2007
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date:
> >> 1/18/2007
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> >> same day) send an email to:
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >
> > To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
> >
> > To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> > same day) send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#14
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,

I know you are a Equipment retailer, but let's face facts, 98% of what goes
into Magazines is to promote more buying. That is how it works.

I have Stereo 12" woofers for my modest 12'H X 15' X 20' HT room and that
set up produces prodigious bass with their 2600 watts RMS. Unless you have
a really large room and tall ceilings, quad woofers is overkill.

I feel the same about 10 channels.


Thanks,


Larry



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:39 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each speaker is
(except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?




-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Megugorac
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

.1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!


Are we talking overkill here?

Larry



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
Robert A Fowkes
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>Robert,
>
>I am sure you know this.
>
>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>any form.

Rodolfo,

Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
-- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
content. My sound system has never sounded so good.

I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
concentrate on HD media.


-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#15
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Larry,

The purpose of the relatively recent 4 sub technique is not to increase bass
output, but to provide more even bass energy distribution in the room, when
multiple seating locations are used. This technique moderates bass hot
spots and dead spots independant of the use of bass equalization. It
compensates for the resonant mode characteristics that occur with every
room. The techique is not 'overkill' but a very effective corrective
measure to enhance natural bass fidelity for multiple listening locations.

Best regards,
Alan Brown, President
CinemaQuest, Inc.
www.cinemaquestinc.com

-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Larry Megugorac
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:35 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Joe,

I know you are a Equipment retailer, but let's face facts, 98% of what goes
into Magazines is to promote more buying. That is how it works.

I have Stereo 12" woofers for my modest 12'H X 15' X 20' HT room and that
set up produces prodigious bass with their 2600 watts RMS. Unless you have
a really large room and tall ceilings, quad woofers is overkill.

I feel the same about 10 channels.


Thanks,


Larry



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Joseph Azar
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:39 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each speaker is
(except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?




-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Megugorac
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

.1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!


Are we talking overkill here?

Larry



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
Robert A Fowkes
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>Robert,
>
>I am sure you know this.
>
>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>any form.

Rodolfo,

Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
-- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
content. My sound system has never sounded so good.

I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
concentrate on HD media.


-- RAF


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#16
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Stacking all four cabinets on a wall or in a corner for the sole purpose
of vibrating the house is not the only application...

Alan suggests one philosophy that is completely valid and Joseph the
other and also what I was thinking of, full range on each channel. Both
are about obtaining more bass as in better bass and definitely not more
bass to shake the floor as most would understand and unfortunately seek.

Which takes me to my next post...

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Alan Brown wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Larry,
>
> The purpose of the relatively recent 4 sub technique is not to increase bass
> output, but to provide more even bass energy distribution in the room, when
> multiple seating locations are used. This technique moderates bass hot
> spots and dead spots independant of the use of bass equalization. It
> compensates for the resonant mode characteristics that occur with every
> room. The techique is not 'overkill' but a very effective corrective
> measure to enhance natural bass fidelity for multiple listening locations.
>
> Best regards,
> Alan Brown, President
> CinemaQuest, Inc.
> www.cinemaquestinc.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Larry Megugorac
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:35 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Joe,
>
> I know you are a Equipment retailer, but let's face facts, 98% of what goes
> into Magazines is to promote more buying. That is how it works.
>
> I have Stereo 12" woofers for my modest 12'H X 15' X 20' HT room and that
> set up produces prodigious bass with their 2600 watts RMS. Unless you have
> a really large room and tall ceilings, quad woofers is overkill.
>
> I feel the same about 10 channels.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Joseph Azar
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:39 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each speaker is
> (except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Megugorac
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>
>
> Are we talking overkill here?
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of Dr
> Robert A Fowkes
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>Robert,
>>
>>I am sure you know this.
>>
>>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>>any form.
>
>
> Rodolfo,
>
> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>
> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
> concentrate on HD media.
>
>
> -- RAF
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#17
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Hey Guys,

I agree with a lot of what you fellas say about distribution.

Music is way more important to me than video.

I don't like Bass to dominate the sound like someone would who just brought
home a subwoofer(s) for the first time!

That said I like my Music to sound as if I'm at a concert where there are no
woofers at the back of concert halls. Yes I'm one of the few who totally
support high res (more natural) Multichannel Audio (SACD & DVD Audio).

As far as movies go, my stereo subs are tailored at their location to
disperse their output (they are NOT located in corners) so as to distribute
as much bass energy through my room as possible to sound realistic (if that
is a term you can use for movies) as a movie theater sounds to me.

Thanks for the discussion! I always enjoy this type of banter!

Larry


-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Richard Fisher
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:10 PM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Stacking all four cabinets on a wall or in a corner for the sole purpose
of vibrating the house is not the only application...

Alan suggests one philosophy that is completely valid and Joseph the
other and also what I was thinking of, full range on each channel. Both
are about obtaining more bass as in better bass and definitely not more
bass to shake the floor as most would understand and unfortunately seek.

Which takes me to my next post...

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Alan Brown wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Larry,
>
> The purpose of the relatively recent 4 sub technique is not to increase
bass
> output, but to provide more even bass energy distribution in the room,
when
> multiple seating locations are used. This technique moderates bass hot
> spots and dead spots independant of the use of bass equalization. It
> compensates for the resonant mode characteristics that occur with every
> room. The techique is not 'overkill' but a very effective corrective
> measure to enhance natural bass fidelity for multiple listening locations.
>
> Best regards,
> Alan Brown, President
> CinemaQuest, Inc.
> www.cinemaquestinc.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Larry Megugorac
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:35 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Joe,
>
> I know you are a Equipment retailer, but let's face facts, 98% of what
goes
> into Magazines is to promote more buying. That is how it works.
>
> I have Stereo 12" woofers for my modest 12'H X 15' X 20' HT room and that
> set up produces prodigious bass with their 2600 watts RMS. Unless you
have
> a really large room and tall ceilings, quad woofers is overkill.
>
> I feel the same about 10 channels.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Joseph Azar
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:39 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each speaker is
> (except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Megugorac
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>
>
> Are we talking overkill here?
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
Dr
> Robert A Fowkes
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>Robert,
>>
>>I am sure you know this.
>>
>>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>>any form.
>
>
> Rodolfo,
>
> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>
> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
> concentrate on HD media.
>
>
> -- RAF
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#18
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Just an opinion, but the whole idea of audio reproduction is to hear the way
it was originally recorded. If that takes 4 subs or 8 so be it. I always
felt the idea of only two sound channels (right and left stereo) was totally
inadequate and I embraced Quad, etc. when they were popular. If you are
in a concert hall, or at a live rock concert, the sound hits you from all
angles not just front left and right. One is totally immersed in sound and
to reproduce that effect in one's house takes many speakers. I went to the
"Tran Siberian Orchestra" concert back in November and nothing has ever
been louder and the audience was "in the sound", so to speak. The sound
created a feeling that caused my bones to vibrate. It was awesome and to
achieve that at home takes a lot. If you haven't heard TSO in person make
it a point to go next Christmas.........regardless of your faith.

Hugh



----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Brown" <[email protected]>
To: "HDTV Magazine" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?


> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Larry,
>
> The purpose of the relatively recent 4 sub technique is not to increase
> bass
> output, but to provide more even bass energy distribution in the room,
> when
> multiple seating locations are used. This technique moderates bass hot
> spots and dead spots independant of the use of bass equalization. It
> compensates for the resonant mode characteristics that occur with every
> room. The techique is not 'overkill' but a very effective corrective
> measure to enhance natural bass fidelity for multiple listening locations.
>
> Best regards,
> Alan Brown, President
> CinemaQuest, Inc.
> www.cinemaquestinc.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Larry Megugorac
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:35 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Joe,
>
> I know you are a Equipment retailer, but let's face facts, 98% of what
> goes
> into Magazines is to promote more buying. That is how it works.
>
> I have Stereo 12" woofers for my modest 12'H X 15' X 20' HT room and that
> set up produces prodigious bass with their 2600 watts RMS. Unless you
> have
> a really large room and tall ceilings, quad woofers is overkill.
>
> I feel the same about 10 channels.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Joseph Azar
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:39 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each speaker is
> (except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Megugorac
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>
>
> Are we talking overkill here?
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
> Dr
> Robert A Fowkes
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
> To: HDTV Magazine
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>>Robert,
>>
>>I am sure you know this.
>>
>>6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while already.
>>You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>>present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver will
>>artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>>surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will send
>>the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has it in
>>any form.
>
> Rodolfo,
>
> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>
> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
> concentrate on HD media.
>
>
> -- RAF
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#19
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

> I always felt the idea of only two sound channels (right and left
> stereo) was totally inadequate

yet two channel properly implemented is breath taking! Sad that was so
rare...

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Hugh Campbell wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Just an opinion, but the whole idea of audio reproduction is to hear the
> way it was originally recorded. If that takes 4 subs or 8 so be it.
> I always felt the idea of only two sound channels (right and left
> stereo) was totally inadequate and I embraced Quad, etc. when they were
> popular. If you are in a concert hall, or at a live rock concert, the
> sound hits you from all angles not just front left and right. One is
> totally immersed in sound and to reproduce that effect in one's house
> takes many speakers. I went to the "Tran Siberian Orchestra" concert
> back in November and nothing has ever been louder and the audience was
> "in the sound", so to speak. The sound created a feeling that caused
> my bones to vibrate. It was awesome and to achieve that at home takes
> a lot. If you haven't heard TSO in person make it a point to go next
> Christmas.........regardless of your faith.
>
> Hugh
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Brown" <[email protected]>
> To: "HDTV Magazine" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:45 PM
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Larry,
>>
>> The purpose of the relatively recent 4 sub technique is not to
>> increase bass
>> output, but to provide more even bass energy distribution in the room,
>> when
>> multiple seating locations are used. This technique moderates bass hot
>> spots and dead spots independant of the use of bass equalization. It
>> compensates for the resonant mode characteristics that occur with every
>> room. The techique is not 'overkill' but a very effective corrective
>> measure to enhance natural bass fidelity for multiple listening
>> locations.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alan Brown, President
>> CinemaQuest, Inc.
>> www.cinemaquestinc.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> Larry Megugorac
>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:35 PM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Joe,
>>
>> I know you are a Equipment retailer, but let's face facts, 98% of what
>> goes
>> into Magazines is to promote more buying. That is how it works.
>>
>> I have Stereo 12" woofers for my modest 12'H X 15' X 20' HT room and that
>> set up produces prodigious bass with their 2600 watts RMS. Unless you
>> have
>> a really large room and tall ceilings, quad woofers is overkill.
>>
>> I feel the same about 10 channels.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> Joseph Azar
>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:39 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each
>> speaker is
>> (except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Larry Megugorac
>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>>
>>
>> Are we talking overkill here?
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
>> Of Dr
>> Robert A Fowkes
>> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>> Robert,
>>>
>>> I am sure you know this.
>>>
>>> 6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while
>>> already.
>>> You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>>> present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver
>>> will
>>> artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>>> surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will
>>> send
>>> the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has
>>> it in
>>> any form.
>>
>>
>> Rodolfo,
>>
>> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
>> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
>> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
>> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
>> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
>> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
>> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
>> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
>> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
>> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
>> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
>> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
>> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
>> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
>> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
>> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
>> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
>> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
>> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
>> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
>> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
>> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
>> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>>
>> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
>> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
>> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
>> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
>> concentrate on HD media.
>>
>>
>> -- RAF
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#20
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Having a sub at each speaker location is not about volume, it is about
location. Bass direction is discernable, even lower frequencies due to air
pressure on the skin and hair on that skin. A person can feel low
frequencies and it gives direction to the sound. It also (hopefully) creates
an in-phase (time aligned, if you like)wave front for coherent wave front.
It does tend to reduce the null and peak extremes that exist in a room when
only one sub is used.

The problem with this discussion is where the bass is being derived. Is it
just the .1 channel being fed to all subs? Or is it a full range location
channel that is being filtered at the positional sub and just the lower
frequencies are being reproduced? Are the same freqs being filtered out of
the signal going to its companion full range speaker? Because bass
management is so poor, pure music usually sounds awful on most surround
systems, even in 2 channel mode (it is also due to lack of music quality
built into surround electronics as movies are not meant to be realistic
sound, nor accurate in reproduction, so less is spent on circuit accuracy
and more on sound modes, features, etc.). There is no question good stereo
still trumps surround for music.

Music cannot be well reproduced on surround systems for another reason: room
acoustics. Surround tries to reproduce the hall nuances, which includes all
hall echoes and delays. Sending a music echo out a home system also gets an
echo on the echo, due to room echo (reverberation). Nothing like listening
to a large choral work being reproduced on a surround system with the room,
one with high ceilings, hardwood floor partially covered by an area rug, big
glass windows on one side, bare sheet rock walls. The reverberation of the
original hall echo in a room with echo, is tiring.



-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Fisher
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:17 AM
To: HDTV Magazine
Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?

----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

> I always felt the idea of only two sound channels (right and left
> stereo) was totally inadequate

yet two channel properly implemented is breath taking! Sad that was so
rare...

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Hugh Campbell wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Just an opinion, but the whole idea of audio reproduction is to hear the
> way it was originally recorded. If that takes 4 subs or 8 so be it.
> I always felt the idea of only two sound channels (right and left
> stereo) was totally inadequate and I embraced Quad, etc. when they were
> popular. If you are in a concert hall, or at a live rock concert, the
> sound hits you from all angles not just front left and right. One is
> totally immersed in sound and to reproduce that effect in one's house
> takes many speakers. I went to the "Tran Siberian Orchestra" concert
> back in November and nothing has ever been louder and the audience was
> "in the sound", so to speak. The sound created a feeling that caused
> my bones to vibrate. It was awesome and to achieve that at home takes
> a lot. If you haven't heard TSO in person make it a point to go next
> Christmas.........regardless of your faith.
>
> Hugh
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Brown" <[email protected]>
> To: "HDTV Magazine" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:45 PM
> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Larry,
>>
>> The purpose of the relatively recent 4 sub technique is not to
>> increase bass
>> output, but to provide more even bass energy distribution in the room,
>> when
>> multiple seating locations are used. This technique moderates bass hot
>> spots and dead spots independant of the use of bass equalization. It
>> compensates for the resonant mode characteristics that occur with every
>> room. The techique is not 'overkill' but a very effective corrective
>> measure to enhance natural bass fidelity for multiple listening
>> locations.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alan Brown, President
>> CinemaQuest, Inc.
>> www.cinemaquestinc.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> Larry Megugorac
>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:35 PM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Joe,
>>
>> I know you are a Equipment retailer, but let's face facts, 98% of what
>> goes
>> into Magazines is to promote more buying. That is how it works.
>>
>> I have Stereo 12" woofers for my modest 12'H X 15' X 20' HT room and that
>> set up produces prodigious bass with their 2600 watts RMS. Unless you
>> have
>> a really large room and tall ceilings, quad woofers is overkill.
>>
>> I feel the same about 10 channels.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf Of
>> Joseph Azar
>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:39 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> No. You have a woofer in each speaker. Why not a sub where each
>> speaker is
>> (except for the center, which is worse with bass frequencies)?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Larry Megugorac
>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:47 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> .1? .1? The Magazines now talk about 4 subwoofers!!!
>>
>>
>> Are we talking overkill here?
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine On Behalf
>> Of Dr
>> Robert A Fowkes
>> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM
>> To: HDTV Magazine
>> Subject: Re: More channels for Robert?
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> At 03:33 PM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>> Robert,
>>>
>>> I am sure you know this.
>>>
>>> 6.1 and 7.1 using center back speakers are here, and for a while
>>> already.
>>> You could add that center back channel even if no discrete channel is
>>> present on the content. Either your 6.1-7.1 capable pre/pro/receiver
>>> will
>>> artificially decode (create) a matrix version from the left/right rear
>>> surrounds and send the common signals to the back center, or it will
>>> send
>>> the actual center back channel to that speaker if the recording has
>>> it in
>>> any form.
>>
>>
>> Rodolfo,
>>
>> Yes, I've had 7.1 wired in my room since the inception of my home
>> theater. At first I used the seven small speakers (all M&K 150s and
>> 150ss) in conjunction with my Denon 5700 receiver. This AVR had an
>> interesting way of mapping 5.1 sound. For movies I used the three
>> fronts (L/C/R) and two side surrounds. And for music I used the same
>> 3 front speakers + two rear surrounds. Later on, when I purchased my
>> Lexicon MC-8 pre/pro I utilized their Logic7 circuitry to create a
>> 7.1 sound field and it sounded great. In addition, with seven
>> separate amps I was able to accommodate all the 6.1 material out
>> there. Now with the Denon 3806 (to add HDMI to the mix) I'm enjoying
>> all the latest Audio codecs, be it TrueHD, DD+ uncompressed or even a
>> bit of actual 7.1 material which I pleasantly discovered is coming
>> from the games on the PS3. Soon (March 07 firmware upgrade I'm told)
>> full 7.1 channel DTS-HD will be available on the PS3 Blu-ray player
>> which is turning out to be one heck of a player (and I'm not talking
>> about games). Tonight I watched a movie on Blu-ray (admittedly not a
>> critically acclaimed movie but tremendous to show off lossless audio)
>> -- Walt Disney's HAUNTED MANSION. It featured a fully uncompressed
>> DD 5.1 soundtrack that delivered audio at an ear-opening 6.9
>> Mbps! Contrast this to "normal" 5.1 sound which had 640Kbps on the
>> sound track (and sometimes offers 448Kbps). Ten times (!) the sonic
>> resolution truly makes a world of difference when listening to
>> content. My sound system has never sounded so good.
>>
>> I've been telling people that if they don't SEE a world of difference
>> between HD discs and good upscaled SD discs wait until they HEAR the
>> difference between the two formats' soundtracks. The audio
>> capability alone (if properly implemented) is reason enough to
>> concentrate on HD media.
>>
>>
>> -- RAF
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]