slowly planning for "home theater 2.0"

Started by neurot Apr 15, 2008 12 posts
Read-only archive
#1
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice on
various parts along the way.


Current system:

Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
Custom-built home theater computer
Dish HD-DVR

After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a million
other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray player, and
upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats. These are my first
upgrades I'm considering.

Questions:

Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often, so I
don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.

Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It seems to
have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to replace
that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews, aside from some HDMI
handshake issues, which seem to be largely resolved with the latest
firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm finding is $900 including shipping.

My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an issue?

thanks!

Jason

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#2
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Good article here:
http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/reviews/200 ... player.php


Shane Sturgeon



Jason Burroughs wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice on
> various parts along the way.
>
>
> Current system:
>
> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
> Custom-built home theater computer
> Dish HD-DVR
>
> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
> towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a million
> other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray player, and
> upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats. These are my
> first upgrades I'm considering.
>
> Questions:
>
> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often, so I
> don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>
> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It seems
> to have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
> sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to replace
> that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews, aside from some
> HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be largely resolved with the
> latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm finding is $900 including
> shipping.
>
> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
> issue?
>
> thanks!
>
> Jason
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#3
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It seems to
> have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
> sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to replace
> that one quite yet).

Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources to
1080i analog video?

> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
issue?

Nope

> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?

It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it will
support bit stream audio directly from the disc.


Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Jason Burroughs wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice on
> various parts along the way.
>
>
> Current system:
>
> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
> Custom-built home theater computer
> Dish HD-DVR
>
> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
> towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a million
> other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray player, and
> upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats. These are my first
> upgrades I'm considering.
>
> Questions:
>
> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often, so I
> don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>
> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It seems to
> have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
> sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to replace
> that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews, aside from some HDMI
> handshake issues, which seem to be largely resolved with the latest
> firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm finding is $900 including shipping.
>
> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an issue?
>
> thanks!
>
> Jason
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#4
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI, then
output 1080i analog component. This is a key sticking point, because
without that, I can't do high definition audio either. The receiver I
have doesn't do HDMI, or decode the new formats. That means I need the
source (PS3) to do the decoding - but the PS3 doesn't support analog
output like the home theater computer does. This puts me in a quandary:
with the PS3, I need to pass the video over component video, but the
audio over HDMI (assuming I replace the receiver, which necessitates
replacing the TV).

This strange set of circumstances/gotchas leads me to believe that I
can't enjoy high definition audio (Dolby Plus and TrueHD, DTS-HD and MA)
without replacing my receiver AND monitor.

This would seem to be a pretty big limitation for the PS3 - the
inability to use the HD audio tracks on non-HDMI equipped TVs
(regardless of the receiver).

From the searching I've done, I can't find any blu-ray player with
analog outputs. And, even in the home theater computer space, the audio
from blu-ray is downsampled to 48khz/16bit! This is something I'm just
finding out.

So I guess my question is: without an HDMI display, is it possible to
use high definition audio tracks? Can I use component video outputs, but
still use HDMI to get the audio to the receiver simultaneously?

Jason

Richard Fisher wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> > Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
> seems to
> > have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
> > sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to replace
> > that one quite yet).
>
> Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources to
> 1080i analog video?
>
> > My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
> issue?
>
> Nope
>
> > Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?
>
> It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it will
> support bit stream audio directly from the disc.
>
>
> Richard Fisher
> ISF and HAA certified
> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>
> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice
>> on various parts along the way.
>>
>>
>> Current system:
>>
>> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
>> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
>> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
>> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
>> Custom-built home theater computer
>> Dish HD-DVR
>>
>> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
>> towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a
>> million other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray
>> player, and upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats.
>> These are my first upgrades I'm considering.
>>
>> Questions:
>>
>> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
>> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often, so
>> I don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>>
>> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It seems
>> to have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>> sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to
>> replace that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews, aside from
>> some HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be largely resolved with
>> the latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm finding is $900
>> including shipping.
>>
>> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>> issue?
>>
>> thanks!
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#5
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

> Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI, then
> output 1080i analog component.

As expected.

To take full advantage of all features available today and retain full
convenience you need an HDMI input.

If you want to keep the TV
HDfury - HDMI to RGBHV adapter, HDCP compliant to 1080p
http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8497

The Pioneers may have received rave reviews but... the 480p side color
decoder is wacked out. The 1080i side uses signal processing to create
artificial detail and when you go RGB you will lose that although RGB is
far closer to high fidelity and the color decoder is bypassed.

To get the most out of any Blu-ray or HD DVD player requires HDMI.
Please check my reviews for some of the ins and outs of going analog
video with HDMI audio.

Panasonic DMP-BD10A Blu-ray and SD DVD player
LG BH100 Universal HD DVD/Blu-ray Player
http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/author.php? ... sher&id=20

And from a soon to be released HD DVD review...
Only those with a display that does not support HDCP HDMI or DVI need to
take note of this. For those upgrading a legacy home theater system
using analog video connections and starting on the audio side with HDMI
audio you are going to have some problems just like other HD disc
players. If you intend to use the HDMI connection for audio and HD DVD
you will be pleased to know that you will get full HD audio support via
bitstream or multi-channel. Unfortunately with SD DVD you will get sound
but will be left out in the cold with no image at all. The fix for that
is to use the optical SD digital audio output and when you switch your
receiver to that input that should release the HDMI turning on the
analog video again. As I was checking out how this would work for you I
also found another operational bug; to get the bitstream from SD DVD I
had to go into the setup menu and change the SPDIF output to that yet
when I switched back to HD DVD the receiver would only indicate PCM
rather than PCM 96khz requiring me to go back into the setup menu and
change the SPDIF back to PCM to get PCM 96khz on the receiver. While SD
DVD allows you to stop, make changes and return back to where you were
HD DVD always forces a reboot if you press the stop key. The following
is a frustrated general statement based on this and other reviews. This
is yet another firmware or design flaw that could be overcome by
allowing the product to automatically switch to the proper settings
depending on the end users application. There is no reason these players
cannot output HD audio via HDMI via bitstream or PCM with an HD disc at
1080i or 720p analog video and switch to SD bitstream or PCM at 480p
analog video with SD DVD allowing those in transition to get the maximum
benefits from both formats on the same player without additional setup
effort, A/V switching or another player.

Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Jason Burroughs wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI, then
> output 1080i analog component. This is a key sticking point, because
> without that, I can't do high definition audio either. The receiver I
> have doesn't do HDMI, or decode the new formats. That means I need the
> source (PS3) to do the decoding - but the PS3 doesn't support analog
> output like the home theater computer does. This puts me in a quandary:
> with the PS3, I need to pass the video over component video, but the
> audio over HDMI (assuming I replace the receiver, which necessitates
> replacing the TV).
>
> This strange set of circumstances/gotchas leads me to believe that I
> can't enjoy high definition audio (Dolby Plus and TrueHD, DTS-HD and MA)
> without replacing my receiver AND monitor.
>
> This would seem to be a pretty big limitation for the PS3 - the
> inability to use the HD audio tracks on non-HDMI equipped TVs
> (regardless of the receiver).
>
> From the searching I've done, I can't find any blu-ray player with
> analog outputs. And, even in the home theater computer space, the audio
> from blu-ray is downsampled to 48khz/16bit! This is something I'm just
> finding out.
>
> So I guess my question is: without an HDMI display, is it possible to
> use high definition audio tracks? Can I use component video outputs, but
> still use HDMI to get the audio to the receiver simultaneously?
>
> Jason
>
> Richard Fisher wrote:
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> > Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>> seems to
>> > have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>> > sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to replace
>> > that one quite yet).
>>
>> Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources to
>> 1080i analog video?
>>
>> > My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>> issue?
>>
>> Nope
>>
>> > Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?
>>
>> It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it will
>> support bit stream audio directly from the disc.
>>
>>
>> Richard Fisher
>> ISF and HAA certified
>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>
>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice
>>> on various parts along the way.
>>>
>>>
>>> Current system:
>>>
>>> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
>>> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
>>> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
>>> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
>>> Custom-built home theater computer
>>> Dish HD-DVR
>>>
>>> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
>>> towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a
>>> million other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray
>>> player, and upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats.
>>> These are my first upgrades I'm considering.
>>>
>>> Questions:
>>>
>>> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
>>> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often, so
>>> I don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It seems
>>> to have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>>> sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to
>>> replace that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews, aside from
>>> some HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be largely resolved with
>>> the latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm finding is $900
>>> including shipping.
>>>
>>> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>>> issue?
>>>
>>> thanks!
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>> same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#6
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Thanks Richard. From your comment, and the research I've done, sounds
like I don't need a receiver that does *any* decoding of these new fancy
formats. As long as the blu-ray device does the decoding (and the PS3
now decodes every one of them), I just pass LPCM to the receiver, and as
long as it supports any format of HDMI (1.1, 1.3, etc), it will give me
the same quality audio. I may opt for a 1.3b receiver, to be more future
proof, but doesn't sound like it is a requirement at this time.

Looks like I need the HD Fury, any HDMI receiver, and the PS3 to have a
1080i version of blu-ray with the advanced audio formats. Fill in the
gaps if there are any.

BTW - With the HTPC, which outputs analog 7.1, I didn't even need an
HDMI receiver - however, the version of PowerDVD software that can
output these formats over analog in full quality (as opposed to being
cut down to 48khz/16-bit) is not out for at least a few months.

I also agree about RGB vs component (PbPrY) - the quality of my RGB
connection on the pioneer is better than the standard component video
input.

Jason

Richard Fisher wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> > Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI, then
> > output 1080i analog component.
>
> As expected.
>
> To take full advantage of all features available today and retain full
> convenience you need an HDMI input.
>
> If you want to keep the TV
> HDfury - HDMI to RGBHV adapter, HDCP compliant to 1080p
> http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8497
>
> The Pioneers may have received rave reviews but... the 480p side color
> decoder is wacked out. The 1080i side uses signal processing to create
> artificial detail and when you go RGB you will lose that although RGB
> is far closer to high fidelity and the color decoder is bypassed.
>
> To get the most out of any Blu-ray or HD DVD player requires HDMI.
> Please check my reviews for some of the ins and outs of going analog
> video with HDMI audio.
>
> Panasonic DMP-BD10A Blu-ray and SD DVD player
> LG BH100 Universal HD DVD/Blu-ray Player
> http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/author.php? ... sher&id=20
>
> And from a soon to be released HD DVD review...
> Only those with a display that does not support HDCP HDMI or DVI need
> to take note of this. For those upgrading a legacy home theater system
> using analog video connections and starting on the audio side with
> HDMI audio you are going to have some problems just like other HD disc
> players. If you intend to use the HDMI connection for audio and HD DVD
> you will be pleased to know that you will get full HD audio support
> via bitstream or multi-channel. Unfortunately with SD DVD you will get
> sound but will be left out in the cold with no image at all. The fix
> for that is to use the optical SD digital audio output and when you
> switch your receiver to that input that should release the HDMI
> turning on the analog video again. As I was checking out how this
> would work for you I also found another operational bug; to get the
> bitstream from SD DVD I had to go into the setup menu and change the
> SPDIF output to that yet when I switched back to HD DVD the receiver
> would only indicate PCM rather than PCM 96khz requiring me to go back
> into the setup menu and change the SPDIF back to PCM to get PCM 96khz
> on the receiver. While SD DVD allows you to stop, make changes and
> return back to where you were HD DVD always forces a reboot if you
> press the stop key. The following is a frustrated general statement
> based on this and other reviews. This is yet another firmware or
> design flaw that could be overcome by allowing the product to
> automatically switch to the proper settings depending on the end users
> application. There is no reason these players cannot output HD audio
> via HDMI via bitstream or PCM with an HD disc at 1080i or 720p analog
> video and switch to SD bitstream or PCM at 480p analog video with SD
> DVD allowing those in transition to get the maximum benefits from both
> formats on the same player without additional setup effort, A/V
> switching or another player.
>
> Richard Fisher
> ISF and HAA certified
> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>
> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI,
>> then output 1080i analog component. This is a key sticking point,
>> because without that, I can't do high definition audio either. The
>> receiver I have doesn't do HDMI, or decode the new formats. That
>> means I need the source (PS3) to do the decoding - but the PS3
>> doesn't support analog output like the home theater computer does.
>> This puts me in a quandary: with the PS3, I need to pass the video
>> over component video, but the audio over HDMI (assuming I replace the
>> receiver, which necessitates replacing the TV).
>>
>> This strange set of circumstances/gotchas leads me to believe that I
>> can't enjoy high definition audio (Dolby Plus and TrueHD, DTS-HD and
>> MA) without replacing my receiver AND monitor.
>>
>> This would seem to be a pretty big limitation for the PS3 - the
>> inability to use the HD audio tracks on non-HDMI equipped TVs
>> (regardless of the receiver).
>>
>> From the searching I've done, I can't find any blu-ray player with
>> analog outputs. And, even in the home theater computer space, the
>> audio from blu-ray is downsampled to 48khz/16bit! This is something
>> I'm just finding out.
>>
>> So I guess my question is: without an HDMI display, is it possible to
>> use high definition audio tracks? Can I use component video outputs,
>> but still use HDMI to get the audio to the receiver simultaneously?
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> Richard Fisher wrote:
>>
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> > Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>> seems to
>>> > have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>>> > sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to
>>> replace
>>> > that one quite yet).
>>>
>>> Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources to
>>> 1080i analog video?
>>>
>>> > My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be
>>> an issue?
>>>
>>> Nope
>>>
>>> > Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?
>>>
>>> It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it
>>> will support bit stream audio directly from the disc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Richard Fisher
>>> ISF and HAA certified
>>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>>
>>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>>
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice
>>>> on various parts along the way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Current system:
>>>>
>>>> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
>>>> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
>>>> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
>>>> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
>>>> Custom-built home theater computer
>>>> Dish HD-DVR
>>>>
>>>> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
>>>> towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a
>>>> million other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray
>>>> player, and upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats.
>>>> These are my first upgrades I'm considering.
>>>>
>>>> Questions:
>>>>
>>>> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
>>>> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often,
>>>> so I don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>>> seems to have all the features I need, including the ability to
>>>> take in all sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not
>>>> ready to replace that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews,
>>>> aside from some HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be largely
>>>> resolved with the latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm
>>>> finding is $900 including shipping.
>>>>
>>>> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>>>> issue?
>>>>
>>>> thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#7
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

> I just pass LPCM to the receiver, and as
> long as it supports any format of HDMI (1.1, 1.3, etc), it will give me
> the same quality audio.

Don't want to burst your bubble but if top performance is your goal...

The HD-A35 provided my first opportunity to directly compare the native
bitstream to converted PCM. While PCM decoding should be identical in
theory, the reality is upon entering your A/V receiver it will be sliced
and diced yet again so it can be applied to your room correction and
speaker setup which is part and parcel of any HT sound system. One of
the annoying attributes of analog multi-channel inputs was the fact that
you could not typically perform those functions at the receiver and the
player lacked the in depth adjustments as a substitute. Those receivers
that could perform those functions had to convert the analog back into
digital for the slicing and dicing adding another process to degrade the
sound. By being able to pass on the native bitstream from the disc to
the receiver, processing steps get bypassed providing the potential for
superior performance.

Based on testing, that is what my ears experienced. The difference was
not dramatic but it did exist. The best description is slightly more of
everything as if a slight veil had been removed between my ears and the
speakers. Like SD DVD, if you are looking for the best in sound, native
bitstream decoding by your A/V receiver is the future!


Richard Fisher
ISF and HAA certified
HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php

Jason Burroughs wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Thanks Richard. From your comment, and the research I've done, sounds
> like I don't need a receiver that does *any* decoding of these new fancy
> formats. As long as the blu-ray device does the decoding (and the PS3
> now decodes every one of them), I just pass LPCM to the receiver, and as
> long as it supports any format of HDMI (1.1, 1.3, etc), it will give me
> the same quality audio. I may opt for a 1.3b receiver, to be more future
> proof, but doesn't sound like it is a requirement at this time.
>
> Looks like I need the HD Fury, any HDMI receiver, and the PS3 to have a
> 1080i version of blu-ray with the advanced audio formats. Fill in the
> gaps if there are any.
>
> BTW - With the HTPC, which outputs analog 7.1, I didn't even need an
> HDMI receiver - however, the version of PowerDVD software that can
> output these formats over analog in full quality (as opposed to being
> cut down to 48khz/16-bit) is not out for at least a few months.
>
> I also agree about RGB vs component (PbPrY) - the quality of my RGB
> connection on the pioneer is better than the standard component video
> input.
>
> Jason
>
> Richard Fisher wrote:
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> > Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI, then
>> > output 1080i analog component.
>>
>> As expected.
>>
>> To take full advantage of all features available today and retain full
>> convenience you need an HDMI input.
>>
>> If you want to keep the TV
>> HDfury - HDMI to RGBHV adapter, HDCP compliant to 1080p
>> http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8497
>>
>> The Pioneers may have received rave reviews but... the 480p side color
>> decoder is wacked out. The 1080i side uses signal processing to create
>> artificial detail and when you go RGB you will lose that although RGB
>> is far closer to high fidelity and the color decoder is bypassed.
>>
>> To get the most out of any Blu-ray or HD DVD player requires HDMI.
>> Please check my reviews for some of the ins and outs of going analog
>> video with HDMI audio.
>>
>> Panasonic DMP-BD10A Blu-ray and SD DVD player
>> LG BH100 Universal HD DVD/Blu-ray Player
>> http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/author.php? ... sher&id=20
>>
>> And from a soon to be released HD DVD review...
>> Only those with a display that does not support HDCP HDMI or DVI need
>> to take note of this. For those upgrading a legacy home theater system
>> using analog video connections and starting on the audio side with
>> HDMI audio you are going to have some problems just like other HD disc
>> players. If you intend to use the HDMI connection for audio and HD DVD
>> you will be pleased to know that you will get full HD audio support
>> via bitstream or multi-channel. Unfortunately with SD DVD you will get
>> sound but will be left out in the cold with no image at all. The fix
>> for that is to use the optical SD digital audio output and when you
>> switch your receiver to that input that should release the HDMI
>> turning on the analog video again. As I was checking out how this
>> would work for you I also found another operational bug; to get the
>> bitstream from SD DVD I had to go into the setup menu and change the
>> SPDIF output to that yet when I switched back to HD DVD the receiver
>> would only indicate PCM rather than PCM 96khz requiring me to go back
>> into the setup menu and change the SPDIF back to PCM to get PCM 96khz
>> on the receiver. While SD DVD allows you to stop, make changes and
>> return back to where you were HD DVD always forces a reboot if you
>> press the stop key. The following is a frustrated general statement
>> based on this and other reviews. This is yet another firmware or
>> design flaw that could be overcome by allowing the product to
>> automatically switch to the proper settings depending on the end users
>> application. There is no reason these players cannot output HD audio
>> via HDMI via bitstream or PCM with an HD disc at 1080i or 720p analog
>> video and switch to SD bitstream or PCM at 480p analog video with SD
>> DVD allowing those in transition to get the maximum benefits from both
>> formats on the same player without additional setup effort, A/V
>> switching or another player.
>>
>> Richard Fisher
>> ISF and HAA certified
>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>
>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI,
>>> then output 1080i analog component. This is a key sticking point,
>>> because without that, I can't do high definition audio either. The
>>> receiver I have doesn't do HDMI, or decode the new formats. That
>>> means I need the source (PS3) to do the decoding - but the PS3
>>> doesn't support analog output like the home theater computer does.
>>> This puts me in a quandary: with the PS3, I need to pass the video
>>> over component video, but the audio over HDMI (assuming I replace the
>>> receiver, which necessitates replacing the TV).
>>>
>>> This strange set of circumstances/gotchas leads me to believe that I
>>> can't enjoy high definition audio (Dolby Plus and TrueHD, DTS-HD and
>>> MA) without replacing my receiver AND monitor.
>>>
>>> This would seem to be a pretty big limitation for the PS3 - the
>>> inability to use the HD audio tracks on non-HDMI equipped TVs
>>> (regardless of the receiver).
>>>
>>> From the searching I've done, I can't find any blu-ray player with
>>> analog outputs. And, even in the home theater computer space, the
>>> audio from blu-ray is downsampled to 48khz/16bit! This is something
>>> I'm just finding out.
>>>
>>> So I guess my question is: without an HDMI display, is it possible to
>>> use high definition audio tracks? Can I use component video outputs,
>>> but still use HDMI to get the audio to the receiver simultaneously?
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> Richard Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> > Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>>> seems to
>>>> > have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>>>> > sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to
>>>> replace
>>>> > that one quite yet).
>>>>
>>>> Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources to
>>>> 1080i analog video?
>>>>
>>>> > My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be
>>>> an issue?
>>>>
>>>> Nope
>>>>
>>>> > Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?
>>>>
>>>> It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it
>>>> will support bit stream audio directly from the disc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Richard Fisher
>>>> ISF and HAA certified
>>>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>>>
>>>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice
>>>>> on various parts along the way.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Current system:
>>>>>
>>>>> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
>>>>> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
>>>>> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
>>>>> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
>>>>> Custom-built home theater computer
>>>>> Dish HD-DVR
>>>>>
>>>>> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
>>>>> towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a
>>>>> million other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray
>>>>> player, and upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats.
>>>>> These are my first upgrades I'm considering.
>>>>>
>>>>> Questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
>>>>> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often,
>>>>> so I don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>>>> seems to have all the features I need, including the ability to
>>>>> take in all sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not
>>>>> ready to replace that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews,
>>>>> aside from some HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be largely
>>>>> resolved with the latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm
>>>>> finding is $900 including shipping.
>>>>>
>>>>> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>>>>> issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>> same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#8
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Thanks Richard - that is *exactly* the feedback I was looking for.
Sounded too good to be true, and now that I know it does make a
difference, I'll stick to my original plan of getting a more robust
receiver.

Regarding upconversion - if I have a Dish 1080i satellite box and a
1080i cable box, BUT the receiver can't upconvert DVI/HDMI to 1080p over
the HDMI (for a future 1080p monitor), then my TV would have to do the
upconversion when it receives the 1080i signal. Would I be better
waiting for a future receiver that can do HDMI upconversion from 1080i
to 1080p, or assume that the TV's upconversion is going to be just as
good. Since I'm only talking about 1080i -> 1080p, it seems as if a
simple line double is all that's needed. I don't have nor plan to have
any 720p or lower devices (no SD DVD, no VCR, etc). Am I overthinking this?

Final (interim) configuration: PS3 via HDMI to STR-DA5300ES; Dish
receiver via HDMI to STR-DA5300ES; STR-DA5300ES via HDMI (thru HD Fury)
to RGB/VGA input on TV, all set for 1080i.

Future upgrade: 1080p LCD monitor

Hope this is useful information for others on the list. Surely there are
lots of us out there wanting to use these new HD audio formats, but not
sure what all is required to make it work.

Thanks!

Jason

Richard Fisher wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> > I just pass LPCM to the receiver, and as
> > long as it supports any format of HDMI (1.1, 1.3, etc), it will give me
> > the same quality audio.
>
> Don't want to burst your bubble but if top performance is your goal...
>
> The HD-A35 provided my first opportunity to directly compare the
> native bitstream to converted PCM. While PCM decoding should be
> identical in theory, the reality is upon entering your A/V receiver it
> will be sliced and diced yet again so it can be applied to your room
> correction and speaker setup which is part and parcel of any HT sound
> system. One of the annoying attributes of analog multi-channel inputs
> was the fact that you could not typically perform those functions at
> the receiver and the player lacked the in depth adjustments as a
> substitute. Those receivers that could perform those functions had to
> convert the analog back into digital for the slicing and dicing adding
> another process to degrade the sound. By being able to pass on the
> native bitstream from the disc to the receiver, processing steps get
> bypassed providing the potential for superior performance.
>
> Based on testing, that is what my ears experienced. The difference was
> not dramatic but it did exist. The best description is slightly more
> of everything as if a slight veil had been removed between my ears and
> the speakers. Like SD DVD, if you are looking for the best in sound,
> native bitstream decoding by your A/V receiver is the future!
>
>
> Richard Fisher
> ISF and HAA certified
> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>
> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Thanks Richard. From your comment, and the research I've done, sounds
>> like I don't need a receiver that does *any* decoding of these new fancy
>> formats. As long as the blu-ray device does the decoding (and the PS3
>> now decodes every one of them), I just pass LPCM to the receiver, and as
>> long as it supports any format of HDMI (1.1, 1.3, etc), it will give me
>> the same quality audio. I may opt for a 1.3b receiver, to be more future
>> proof, but doesn't sound like it is a requirement at this time.
>>
>> Looks like I need the HD Fury, any HDMI receiver, and the PS3 to have a
>> 1080i version of blu-ray with the advanced audio formats. Fill in the
>> gaps if there are any.
>>
>> BTW - With the HTPC, which outputs analog 7.1, I didn't even need an
>> HDMI receiver - however, the version of PowerDVD software that can
>> output these formats over analog in full quality (as opposed to being
>> cut down to 48khz/16-bit) is not out for at least a few months.
>>
>> I also agree about RGB vs component (PbPrY) - the quality of my RGB
>> connection on the pioneer is better than the standard component video
>> input.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> Richard Fisher wrote:
>>
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> > Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI,
>>> then
>>> > output 1080i analog component.
>>>
>>> As expected.
>>>
>>> To take full advantage of all features available today and retain
>>> full convenience you need an HDMI input.
>>>
>>> If you want to keep the TV
>>> HDfury - HDMI to RGBHV adapter, HDCP compliant to 1080p
>>> http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8497
>>>
>>> The Pioneers may have received rave reviews but... the 480p side
>>> color decoder is wacked out. The 1080i side uses signal processing
>>> to create artificial detail and when you go RGB you will lose that
>>> although RGB is far closer to high fidelity and the color decoder is
>>> bypassed.
>>>
>>> To get the most out of any Blu-ray or HD DVD player requires HDMI.
>>> Please check my reviews for some of the ins and outs of going analog
>>> video with HDMI audio.
>>>
>>> Panasonic DMP-BD10A Blu-ray and SD DVD player
>>> LG BH100 Universal HD DVD/Blu-ray Player
>>> http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/author.php? ... sher&id=20
>>>
>>> And from a soon to be released HD DVD review...
>>> Only those with a display that does not support HDCP HDMI or DVI
>>> need to take note of this. For those upgrading a legacy home theater
>>> system using analog video connections and starting on the audio side
>>> with HDMI audio you are going to have some problems just like other
>>> HD disc players. If you intend to use the HDMI connection for audio
>>> and HD DVD you will be pleased to know that you will get full HD
>>> audio support via bitstream or multi-channel. Unfortunately with SD
>>> DVD you will get sound but will be left out in the cold with no
>>> image at all. The fix for that is to use the optical SD digital
>>> audio output and when you switch your receiver to that input that
>>> should release the HDMI turning on the analog video again. As I was
>>> checking out how this would work for you I also found another
>>> operational bug; to get the bitstream from SD DVD I had to go into
>>> the setup menu and change the SPDIF output to that yet when I
>>> switched back to HD DVD the receiver would only indicate PCM rather
>>> than PCM 96khz requiring me to go back into the setup menu and
>>> change the SPDIF back to PCM to get PCM 96khz on the receiver. While
>>> SD DVD allows you to stop, make changes and return back to where you
>>> were HD DVD always forces a reboot if you press the stop key. The
>>> following is a frustrated general statement based on this and other
>>> reviews. This is yet another firmware or design flaw that could be
>>> overcome by allowing the product to automatically switch to the
>>> proper settings depending on the end users application. There is no
>>> reason these players cannot output HD audio via HDMI via bitstream
>>> or PCM with an HD disc at 1080i or 720p analog video and switch to
>>> SD bitstream or PCM at 480p analog video with SD DVD allowing those
>>> in transition to get the maximum benefits from both formats on the
>>> same player without additional setup effort, A/V switching or
>>> another player.
>>>
>>> Richard Fisher
>>> ISF and HAA certified
>>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>>
>>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>>
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI,
>>>> then output 1080i analog component. This is a key sticking point,
>>>> because without that, I can't do high definition audio either. The
>>>> receiver I have doesn't do HDMI, or decode the new formats. That
>>>> means I need the source (PS3) to do the decoding - but the PS3
>>>> doesn't support analog output like the home theater computer does.
>>>> This puts me in a quandary: with the PS3, I need to pass the video
>>>> over component video, but the audio over HDMI (assuming I replace
>>>> the receiver, which necessitates replacing the TV).
>>>>
>>>> This strange set of circumstances/gotchas leads me to believe that
>>>> I can't enjoy high definition audio (Dolby Plus and TrueHD, DTS-HD
>>>> and MA) without replacing my receiver AND monitor.
>>>>
>>>> This would seem to be a pretty big limitation for the PS3 - the
>>>> inability to use the HD audio tracks on non-HDMI equipped TVs
>>>> (regardless of the receiver).
>>>>
>>>> From the searching I've done, I can't find any blu-ray player with
>>>> analog outputs. And, even in the home theater computer space, the
>>>> audio from blu-ray is downsampled to 48khz/16bit! This is something
>>>> I'm just finding out.
>>>>
>>>> So I guess my question is: without an HDMI display, is it possible
>>>> to use high definition audio tracks? Can I use component video
>>>> outputs, but still use HDMI to get the audio to the receiver
>>>> simultaneously?
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> Richard Fisher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>
>>>>> > Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>>>> seems to
>>>>> > have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>>>>> > sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to
>>>>> replace
>>>>> > that one quite yet).
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources
>>>>> to 1080i analog video?
>>>>>
>>>>> > My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be
>>>>> an issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope
>>>>>
>>>>> > Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it
>>>>> will support bit stream audio directly from the disc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Fisher
>>>>> ISF and HAA certified
>>>>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>>>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking
>>>>>> advice on various parts along the way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Current system:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
>>>>>> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
>>>>>> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
>>>>>> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170,
>>>>>> PD10)
>>>>>> Custom-built home theater computer
>>>>>> Dish HD-DVR
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in
>>>>>> the towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and
>>>>>> a million other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray
>>>>>> player, and upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats.
>>>>>> These are my first upgrades I'm considering.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Questions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
>>>>>> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often,
>>>>>> so I don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>>>>> seems to have all the features I need, including the ability to
>>>>>> take in all sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not
>>>>>> ready to replace that one quite yet). I've read some great
>>>>>> reviews, aside from some HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be
>>>>>> largely resolved with the latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price
>>>>>> I'm finding is $900 including shipping.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be
>>>>>> an issue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#9
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Jason,

I see you have done quite an analysis, let me complete it, because there are
another 11 million early adopters like you that would face a similar
situation:

I think you already know this, but just in case: Because your TV does not
have HDMI inputs you "might" eventually not been able to view in HD some
protected HD content, and in such case the audio problem becomes relatively
unimportant.

I know you want hi-bit audio, but you can always listen DD upgraded at
640Kbps by the BD player (from DD+ and Dolby TrueHD), rather than the
typical 384Kbps. That only requires the legacy optical and coax connections
and sounds much cleaner than the DD from regular DVD.

A/V receivers with HDMI inputs receiving HD protected content would NOT
allow you to output 1080i transcoded over component analog connections for
your TV. Neither would allow to transcode 480i/p (DVD) to upconvert to
1080i using component analog, but it would allow it using HDMI outputs.

Because of the requirement of component analog on your TV, you already know
you need to implement two signal paths (and purchase a capable BD player and
A/V Receiver), as follows:

-----------------------
A) The video path of component 1080i analog (or 480i/p when playing regular
DVD) directly from the BD player to your TV, and hope that the HD content
you are playing is not ICT token protected (if they ever flick the switch),
and
----------------------

B) A separate audio path from your BD player to your A/V receiver using any
of the following three options depending on the equipment (PS3 or
otherwise):

B.1) 6 analog cables if your player and receiver have the analog
connections, and the player decodes the hi-bit audio codec you need. I am
not sure about the BD players you have looked at, but my 2006 Sony BDP-S1
has the analog audio connections (and also HDMI).

B.2) with an HDMI 1.0/.1/.2/.3 connection sending individual PCM channels of
the hi-bit audio soundtrack decoded by the BD player, provided the receiver
can accept PCM multichannel, or

B.3) with a HDMI 1.3 connection streaming hi-bit audio from the BD player
for the A/V receiver to decode the stream, which requires HDMI 1.3
connections and protocols at both ends, and of course, the A/V receiver with
the needed hi-bit audio decoders to do the job.
-------------------------


On B2 and B3 make sure that the BD player you select allows simultaneous
HDMI hi-bit audio output with HD video through the component analog
connection. There are players that are said not to allow that, while others
are said to allow it, like some Sonys. I believe Richard said that the
Panasonic he reviewed reduced the component analog to 480p level.

I just talked to Sony to clarify that feature on their newer players, they
confirmed that my 2006 player (top of the line then) and the new BDP-S2000ES
(top of the line now), DO have the simultaneous feature, but the 300 and 500
new models do not. However, when you read the operating manuals they say
that the feature is there on all of them equally (connecting HDMI for hi-bit
audio to the receiver, while sending HD over the component analog, which is
exactly the feature you need).
----------------------

Until you replace your HDTV for an HDMI capable set, and since you are using
two (video and audio) parallel paths among BD player/AV Receiver/TV, you
might want to have your universal remote executing parallel commands so
their settings are synchronized.

In the positive side, maintaining two separate paths allows the HD video
wires to be kept as short as needed if you can move the HD video source
close to the HDTV, and not make it longer than necessary because of a long
audio path to the A/V receiver (if they are in different places, and all is
done by HDMI).

Regarding processing quality and features of PCM or streaming out, remember
that the PCM decoded version contains all the advanced audio mixes of the
Blu-ray format, while the streaming version contains only the soundtrack.
So if you are into advanced features, rather than sit and view the movie,
streaming might not be for you, regardless the implicit quality improvement
that is assumed to have.

Streaming bypasses all the internal player audio track decoding, processing,
and mixes, and outputs the signal as is read from the disc. The A/V
receiver will decode the stream, and usually the chips and decoders on A/V
Receivers are better than the ones included within the players for the same
job; which probably is the reason why it sounded a bit better to Richard's
ears.

The key difference is the quality of the chip and audio processor (of either
the player or the Receiver), and the fact that PCM contains advanced audio
mixes which needs the signal to go thru additional stages within the player,
while the streaming is not because it excludes the mixes. Add all that in a
cocktail mixer and it becomes difficult to determine which is the piece that
is responsible for better or worst sounding, because they interact as a
package.

Regardless who decodes, they both would end up in the Receiver digital
domain stage as individual channels for balancing, bass management, and room
correction, and to the later typical final conversion to analog for
amplification to speaker level voltage, for our analog ears and bone
structure to take over.

The analog connections option requires that the PCM channels decoded (or
read as is on some discs) from the soundtrack stream, be DAC converted, so
they can output the player as analog. Then the receiver would convert them
back to digital for the balancing, bass management, and room correction
mentioned above. So you can say that those two (DAC and ADC) conversions
invite audio errors, compared to the full digital connections options above.

In other words, if you get a player that has simultaneous analog component
1080i sent to your TV, and HDMI hi-bit audio to the receiver (as PCM or bit
stream, or both) you should be set, without any HDMI/to RGB converters added
to the system.

I thought it was important to explain to you the mixing and feature
tradeoffs of the audio options you have, before you assume that streaming
and the RGB converter is the way to go.

I cover this subject in detail on the 2007 HDTV Technology book, on some
multi-channel audio articles on this magazine, and also on the online
glossary that Shane would hopefully update soon on the website.


Best Regards,

Rodolfo La Maestra



-----Original Message-----
From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
Behalf Of Jason Burroughs
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 10:48 AM
To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
Subject: Re: slowly planning for "home theater 2.0"


----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI, then
output 1080i analog component. This is a key sticking point, because
without that, I can't do high definition audio either. The receiver I
have doesn't do HDMI, or decode the new formats. That means I need the
source (PS3) to do the decoding - but the PS3 doesn't support analog
output like the home theater computer does. This puts me in a quandary:
with the PS3, I need to pass the video over component video, but the
audio over HDMI (assuming I replace the receiver, which necessitates
replacing the TV).

This strange set of circumstances/gotchas leads me to believe that I
can't enjoy high definition audio (Dolby Plus and TrueHD, DTS-HD and MA)
without replacing my receiver AND monitor.

This would seem to be a pretty big limitation for the PS3 - the
inability to use the HD audio tracks on non-HDMI equipped TVs
(regardless of the receiver).

From the searching I've done, I can't find any blu-ray player with
analog outputs. And, even in the home theater computer space, the audio
from blu-ray is downsampled to 48khz/16bit! This is something I'm just
finding out.

So I guess my question is: without an HDMI display, is it possible to
use high definition audio tracks? Can I use component video outputs, but
still use HDMI to get the audio to the receiver simultaneously?

Jason

Richard Fisher wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> > Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
> seems to
> > have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
> > sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to replace
> > that one quite yet).
>
> Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources to
> 1080i analog video?
>
> > My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
> issue?
>
> Nope
>
> > Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?
>
> It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it will
> support bit stream audio directly from the disc.
>
>
> Richard Fisher
> ISF and HAA certified
> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>
> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice
>> on various parts along the way.
>>
>>
>> Current system:
>>
>> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
>> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
>> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
>> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
>> Custom-built home theater computer
>> Dish HD-DVR
>>
>> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
>> towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a
>> million other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray
>> player, and upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats.
>> These are my first upgrades I'm considering.
>>
>> Questions:
>>
>> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
>> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often, so
>> I don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>>
>> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It seems
>> to have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>> sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to
>> replace that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews, aside from
>> some HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be largely resolved with
>> the latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm finding is $900
>> including shipping.
>>
>> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>> issue?
>>
>> thanks!
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>

To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
day) send an email to:
[email protected]



To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#10
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

> Streaming bypasses all the internal player audio track decoding,
processing,
> and mixes, and outputs the signal as is read from the disc. The A/V
> receiver will decode the stream, and usually the chips and decoders
on A/V
> Receivers are better than the ones included within the players for
the same
> job; which probably is the reason why it sounded a bit better to
Richard's
> ears.

That is another possibility although this is the first I have heard of
this. I can agree to the difference being one of the two or a combination.

For clarity the other one is: the additional processing to PCM for HDMI
out along with additional slicing and dicing by the receiver for final
processing.


Richard Fisher, HDTV Magazine
A/V Science Editor http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/index.php
Community Director http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum
ISF and HAA certified

Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Jason,
>
> I see you have done quite an analysis, let me complete it, because there are
> another 11 million early adopters like you that would face a similar
> situation:
>
> I think you already know this, but just in case: Because your TV does not
> have HDMI inputs you "might" eventually not been able to view in HD some
> protected HD content, and in such case the audio problem becomes relatively
> unimportant.
>
> I know you want hi-bit audio, but you can always listen DD upgraded at
> 640Kbps by the BD player (from DD+ and Dolby TrueHD), rather than the
> typical 384Kbps. That only requires the legacy optical and coax connections
> and sounds much cleaner than the DD from regular DVD.
>
> A/V receivers with HDMI inputs receiving HD protected content would NOT
> allow you to output 1080i transcoded over component analog connections for
> your TV. Neither would allow to transcode 480i/p (DVD) to upconvert to
> 1080i using component analog, but it would allow it using HDMI outputs.
>
> Because of the requirement of component analog on your TV, you already know
> you need to implement two signal paths (and purchase a capable BD player and
> A/V Receiver), as follows:
>
> -----------------------
> A) The video path of component 1080i analog (or 480i/p when playing regular
> DVD) directly from the BD player to your TV, and hope that the HD content
> you are playing is not ICT token protected (if they ever flick the switch),
> and
> ----------------------
>
> B) A separate audio path from your BD player to your A/V receiver using any
> of the following three options depending on the equipment (PS3 or
> otherwise):
>
> B.1) 6 analog cables if your player and receiver have the analog
> connections, and the player decodes the hi-bit audio codec you need. I am
> not sure about the BD players you have looked at, but my 2006 Sony BDP-S1
> has the analog audio connections (and also HDMI).
>
> B.2) with an HDMI 1.0/.1/.2/.3 connection sending individual PCM channels of
> the hi-bit audio soundtrack decoded by the BD player, provided the receiver
> can accept PCM multichannel, or
>
> B.3) with a HDMI 1.3 connection streaming hi-bit audio from the BD player
> for the A/V receiver to decode the stream, which requires HDMI 1.3
> connections and protocols at both ends, and of course, the A/V receiver with
> the needed hi-bit audio decoders to do the job.
> -------------------------
>
>
> On B2 and B3 make sure that the BD player you select allows simultaneous
> HDMI hi-bit audio output with HD video through the component analog
> connection. There are players that are said not to allow that, while others
> are said to allow it, like some Sonys. I believe Richard said that the
> Panasonic he reviewed reduced the component analog to 480p level.
>
> I just talked to Sony to clarify that feature on their newer players, they
> confirmed that my 2006 player (top of the line then) and the new BDP-S2000ES
> (top of the line now), DO have the simultaneous feature, but the 300 and 500
> new models do not. However, when you read the operating manuals they say
> that the feature is there on all of them equally (connecting HDMI for hi-bit
> audio to the receiver, while sending HD over the component analog, which is
> exactly the feature you need).
> ----------------------
>
> Until you replace your HDTV for an HDMI capable set, and since you are using
> two (video and audio) parallel paths among BD player/AV Receiver/TV, you
> might want to have your universal remote executing parallel commands so
> their settings are synchronized.
>
> In the positive side, maintaining two separate paths allows the HD video
> wires to be kept as short as needed if you can move the HD video source
> close to the HDTV, and not make it longer than necessary because of a long
> audio path to the A/V receiver (if they are in different places, and all is
> done by HDMI).
>
> Regarding processing quality and features of PCM or streaming out, remember
> that the PCM decoded version contains all the advanced audio mixes of the
> Blu-ray format, while the streaming version contains only the soundtrack.
> So if you are into advanced features, rather than sit and view the movie,
> streaming might not be for you, regardless the implicit quality improvement
> that is assumed to have.
>
> Streaming bypasses all the internal player audio track decoding, processing,
> and mixes, and outputs the signal as is read from the disc. The A/V
> receiver will decode the stream, and usually the chips and decoders on A/V
> Receivers are better than the ones included within the players for the same
> job; which probably is the reason why it sounded a bit better to Richard's
> ears.
>
> The key difference is the quality of the chip and audio processor (of either
> the player or the Receiver), and the fact that PCM contains advanced audio
> mixes which needs the signal to go thru additional stages within the player,
> while the streaming is not because it excludes the mixes. Add all that in a
> cocktail mixer and it becomes difficult to determine which is the piece that
> is responsible for better or worst sounding, because they interact as a
> package.
>
> Regardless who decodes, they both would end up in the Receiver digital
> domain stage as individual channels for balancing, bass management, and room
> correction, and to the later typical final conversion to analog for
> amplification to speaker level voltage, for our analog ears and bone
> structure to take over.
>
> The analog connections option requires that the PCM channels decoded (or
> read as is on some discs) from the soundtrack stream, be DAC converted, so
> they can output the player as analog. Then the receiver would convert them
> back to digital for the balancing, bass management, and room correction
> mentioned above. So you can say that those two (DAC and ADC) conversions
> invite audio errors, compared to the full digital connections options above.
>
> In other words, if you get a player that has simultaneous analog component
> 1080i sent to your TV, and HDMI hi-bit audio to the receiver (as PCM or bit
> stream, or both) you should be set, without any HDMI/to RGB converters added
> to the system.
>
> I thought it was important to explain to you the mixing and feature
> tradeoffs of the audio options you have, before you assume that streaming
> and the RGB converter is the way to go.
>
> I cover this subject in detail on the 2007 HDTV Technology book, on some
> multi-channel audio articles on this magazine, and also on the online
> glossary that Shane would hopefully update soon on the website.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
> Behalf Of Jason Burroughs
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 10:48 AM
> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
> Subject: Re: slowly planning for "home theater 2.0"
>
>
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI, then
> output 1080i analog component. This is a key sticking point, because
> without that, I can't do high definition audio either. The receiver I
> have doesn't do HDMI, or decode the new formats. That means I need the
> source (PS3) to do the decoding - but the PS3 doesn't support analog
> output like the home theater computer does. This puts me in a quandary:
> with the PS3, I need to pass the video over component video, but the
> audio over HDMI (assuming I replace the receiver, which necessitates
> replacing the TV).
>
> This strange set of circumstances/gotchas leads me to believe that I
> can't enjoy high definition audio (Dolby Plus and TrueHD, DTS-HD and MA)
> without replacing my receiver AND monitor.
>
> This would seem to be a pretty big limitation for the PS3 - the
> inability to use the HD audio tracks on non-HDMI equipped TVs
> (regardless of the receiver).
>
> From the searching I've done, I can't find any blu-ray player with
> analog outputs. And, even in the home theater computer space, the audio
> from blu-ray is downsampled to 48khz/16bit! This is something I'm just
> finding out.
>
> So I guess my question is: without an HDMI display, is it possible to
> use high definition audio tracks? Can I use component video outputs, but
> still use HDMI to get the audio to the receiver simultaneously?
>
> Jason
>
> Richard Fisher wrote:
>
>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>>
>>>Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>
>>seems to
>>
>>>have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>>>sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to replace
>>>that one quite yet).
>>
>>Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources to
>>1080i analog video?
>>
>>
>>>My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>>
>>issue?
>>
>>Nope
>>
>>
>>>Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?
>>
>>It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it will
>>support bit stream audio directly from the disc.
>>
>>
>>Richard Fisher
>>ISF and HAA certified
>>HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>
>>Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>
>>>----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>>I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice
>>>on various parts along the way.
>>>
>>>
>>>Current system:
>>>
>>>Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
>>>Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
>>>Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
>>>Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
>>>Custom-built home theater computer
>>>Dish HD-DVR
>>>
>>>After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
>>>towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a
>>>million other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray
>>>player, and upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats.
>>>These are my first upgrades I'm considering.
>>>
>>>Questions:
>>>
>>>Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
>>>comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often, so
>>>I don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>>>
>>>Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It seems
>>>to have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>>>sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to
>>>replace that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews, aside from
>>>some HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be largely resolved with
>>>the latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm finding is $900
>>>including shipping.
>>>
>>>My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>>>issue?
>>>
>>>thanks!
>>>
>>>Jason
>>>
>>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>>same day) send an email to:
>>>[email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>>To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>same day) send an email to:
>>[email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same
> day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#11
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

> Regarding upconversion
> Since I'm only talking about 1080i -> 1080p, it seems as if a
> simple line double is all that's needed.

Although not documented in their reviews, the Panasonic PTAE1000 (LCD)
excelled with 1080i scaling while the BenQ W10000 (DLP) was filtering
the vertical response. That was a simplistic test with patterns, not
film or video content. No conversion was ever simple because the signal
can be either native video or native film. Motion adaptive versus 2/3
pull down cadence processing and proper detection.

So far I don't mind the filtering because the HD that I am getting is
not perfect and that filtering helps hide some of the artifacts. LOL The
Panasonic LCD is not a data grade monitor, lacks a detail response, so
it naturally does some filtering regardless of passing the pattern test.

On the other hand with 1080p PC, HD disc or PS3 gaming I seek a detailed
1:1 pixel mapped data grade response for the ultimate in detail because
they can deliver it without the artifacts of broadcast services. The
BenQ serves that purpose with aplomb.

The key as always; can the internal scaler be bypassed. If so then there
is no need to worry because you have not limited your options. In
general, most current 1080p displays allow internal scaler bypassing but
without a review confirming that, buyer beware, because products are
like a box of chocolates, never know what you'll unexpectedly find.

:)

As always, if ultimate performance is your bag you should work with your
favorite ISF calibrator to make sure the product(s) will meet the
desired application and receive a calibration in your home.

Richard Fisher, HDTV Magazine
A/V Science Editor http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/index.php
Community Director http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum
ISF and HAA certified

Jason Burroughs wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> Thanks Richard - that is *exactly* the feedback I was looking for.
> Sounded too good to be true, and now that I know it does make a
> difference, I'll stick to my original plan of getting a more robust
> receiver.
>
> Regarding upconversion - if I have a Dish 1080i satellite box and a
> 1080i cable box, BUT the receiver can't upconvert DVI/HDMI to 1080p over
> the HDMI (for a future 1080p monitor), then my TV would have to do the
> upconversion when it receives the 1080i signal. Would I be better
> waiting for a future receiver that can do HDMI upconversion from 1080i
> to 1080p, or assume that the TV's upconversion is going to be just as
> good. Since I'm only talking about 1080i -> 1080p, it seems as if a
> simple line double is all that's needed. I don't have nor plan to have
> any 720p or lower devices (no SD DVD, no VCR, etc). Am I overthinking this?
>
> Final (interim) configuration: PS3 via HDMI to STR-DA5300ES; Dish
> receiver via HDMI to STR-DA5300ES; STR-DA5300ES via HDMI (thru HD Fury)
> to RGB/VGA input on TV, all set for 1080i.
>
> Future upgrade: 1080p LCD monitor
>
> Hope this is useful information for others on the list. Surely there are
> lots of us out there wanting to use these new HD audio formats, but not
> sure what all is required to make it work.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jason
>
> Richard Fisher wrote:
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> > I just pass LPCM to the receiver, and as
>> > long as it supports any format of HDMI (1.1, 1.3, etc), it will give me
>> > the same quality audio.
>>
>> Don't want to burst your bubble but if top performance is your goal...
>>
>> The HD-A35 provided my first opportunity to directly compare the
>> native bitstream to converted PCM. While PCM decoding should be
>> identical in theory, the reality is upon entering your A/V receiver it
>> will be sliced and diced yet again so it can be applied to your room
>> correction and speaker setup which is part and parcel of any HT sound
>> system. One of the annoying attributes of analog multi-channel inputs
>> was the fact that you could not typically perform those functions at
>> the receiver and the player lacked the in depth adjustments as a
>> substitute. Those receivers that could perform those functions had to
>> convert the analog back into digital for the slicing and dicing adding
>> another process to degrade the sound. By being able to pass on the
>> native bitstream from the disc to the receiver, processing steps get
>> bypassed providing the potential for superior performance.
>>
>> Based on testing, that is what my ears experienced. The difference was
>> not dramatic but it did exist. The best description is slightly more
>> of everything as if a slight veil had been removed between my ears and
>> the speakers. Like SD DVD, if you are looking for the best in sound,
>> native bitstream decoding by your A/V receiver is the future!
>>
>>
>> Richard Fisher
>> ISF and HAA certified
>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>
>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>> Thanks Richard. From your comment, and the research I've done, sounds
>>> like I don't need a receiver that does *any* decoding of these new fancy
>>> formats. As long as the blu-ray device does the decoding (and the PS3
>>> now decodes every one of them), I just pass LPCM to the receiver, and as
>>> long as it supports any format of HDMI (1.1, 1.3, etc), it will give me
>>> the same quality audio. I may opt for a 1.3b receiver, to be more future
>>> proof, but doesn't sound like it is a requirement at this time.
>>>
>>> Looks like I need the HD Fury, any HDMI receiver, and the PS3 to have a
>>> 1080i version of blu-ray with the advanced audio formats. Fill in the
>>> gaps if there are any.
>>>
>>> BTW - With the HTPC, which outputs analog 7.1, I didn't even need an
>>> HDMI receiver - however, the version of PowerDVD software that can
>>> output these formats over analog in full quality (as opposed to being
>>> cut down to 48khz/16-bit) is not out for at least a few months.
>>>
>>> I also agree about RGB vs component (PbPrY) - the quality of my RGB
>>> connection on the pioneer is better than the standard component video
>>> input.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> Richard Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> > Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI,
>>>> then
>>>> > output 1080i analog component.
>>>>
>>>> As expected.
>>>>
>>>> To take full advantage of all features available today and retain
>>>> full convenience you need an HDMI input.
>>>>
>>>> If you want to keep the TV
>>>> HDfury - HDMI to RGBHV adapter, HDCP compliant to 1080p
>>>> http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8497
>>>>
>>>> The Pioneers may have received rave reviews but... the 480p side
>>>> color decoder is wacked out. The 1080i side uses signal processing
>>>> to create artificial detail and when you go RGB you will lose that
>>>> although RGB is far closer to high fidelity and the color decoder is
>>>> bypassed.
>>>>
>>>> To get the most out of any Blu-ray or HD DVD player requires HDMI.
>>>> Please check my reviews for some of the ins and outs of going analog
>>>> video with HDMI audio.
>>>>
>>>> Panasonic DMP-BD10A Blu-ray and SD DVD player
>>>> LG BH100 Universal HD DVD/Blu-ray Player
>>>> http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/author.php? ... sher&id=20
>>>>
>>>> And from a soon to be released HD DVD review...
>>>> Only those with a display that does not support HDCP HDMI or DVI
>>>> need to take note of this. For those upgrading a legacy home theater
>>>> system using analog video connections and starting on the audio side
>>>> with HDMI audio you are going to have some problems just like other
>>>> HD disc players. If you intend to use the HDMI connection for audio
>>>> and HD DVD you will be pleased to know that you will get full HD
>>>> audio support via bitstream or multi-channel. Unfortunately with SD
>>>> DVD you will get sound but will be left out in the cold with no
>>>> image at all. The fix for that is to use the optical SD digital
>>>> audio output and when you switch your receiver to that input that
>>>> should release the HDMI turning on the analog video again. As I was
>>>> checking out how this would work for you I also found another
>>>> operational bug; to get the bitstream from SD DVD I had to go into
>>>> the setup menu and change the SPDIF output to that yet when I
>>>> switched back to HD DVD the receiver would only indicate PCM rather
>>>> than PCM 96khz requiring me to go back into the setup menu and
>>>> change the SPDIF back to PCM to get PCM 96khz on the receiver. While
>>>> SD DVD allows you to stop, make changes and return back to where you
>>>> were HD DVD always forces a reboot if you press the stop key. The
>>>> following is a frustrated general statement based on this and other
>>>> reviews. This is yet another firmware or design flaw that could be
>>>> overcome by allowing the product to automatically switch to the
>>>> proper settings depending on the end users application. There is no
>>>> reason these players cannot output HD audio via HDMI via bitstream
>>>> or PCM with an HD disc at 1080i or 720p analog video and switch to
>>>> SD bitstream or PCM at 480p analog video with SD DVD allowing those
>>>> in transition to get the maximum benefits from both formats on the
>>>> same player without additional setup effort, A/V switching or
>>>> another player.
>>>>
>>>> Richard Fisher
>>>> ISF and HAA certified
>>>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>>>
>>>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI,
>>>>> then output 1080i analog component. This is a key sticking point,
>>>>> because without that, I can't do high definition audio either. The
>>>>> receiver I have doesn't do HDMI, or decode the new formats. That
>>>>> means I need the source (PS3) to do the decoding - but the PS3
>>>>> doesn't support analog output like the home theater computer does.
>>>>> This puts me in a quandary: with the PS3, I need to pass the video
>>>>> over component video, but the audio over HDMI (assuming I replace
>>>>> the receiver, which necessitates replacing the TV).
>>>>>
>>>>> This strange set of circumstances/gotchas leads me to believe that
>>>>> I can't enjoy high definition audio (Dolby Plus and TrueHD, DTS-HD
>>>>> and MA) without replacing my receiver AND monitor.
>>>>>
>>>>> This would seem to be a pretty big limitation for the PS3 - the
>>>>> inability to use the HD audio tracks on non-HDMI equipped TVs
>>>>> (regardless of the receiver).
>>>>>
>>>>> From the searching I've done, I can't find any blu-ray player with
>>>>> analog outputs. And, even in the home theater computer space, the
>>>>> audio from blu-ray is downsampled to 48khz/16bit! This is something
>>>>> I'm just finding out.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I guess my question is: without an HDMI display, is it possible
>>>>> to use high definition audio tracks? Can I use component video
>>>>> outputs, but still use HDMI to get the audio to the receiver
>>>>> simultaneously?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Fisher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>>>>> seems to
>>>>>> > have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>>>>>> > sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to
>>>>>> replace
>>>>>> > that one quite yet).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources
>>>>>> to 1080i analog video?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be
>>>>>> an issue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it
>>>>>> will support bit stream audio directly from the disc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Richard Fisher
>>>>>> ISF and HAA certified
>>>>>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>>>>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking
>>>>>>> advice on various parts along the way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Current system:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
>>>>>>> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
>>>>>>> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
>>>>>>> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170,
>>>>>>> PD10)
>>>>>>> Custom-built home theater computer
>>>>>>> Dish HD-DVR
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in
>>>>>>> the towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and
>>>>>>> a million other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray
>>>>>>> player, and upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats.
>>>>>>> These are my first upgrades I'm considering.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Questions:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
>>>>>>> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often,
>>>>>>> so I don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>>>>>> seems to have all the features I need, including the ability to
>>>>>>> take in all sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not
>>>>>>> ready to replace that one quite yet). I've read some great
>>>>>>> reviews, aside from some HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be
>>>>>>> largely resolved with the latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price
>>>>>>> I'm finding is $900 including shipping.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be
>>>>>>> an issue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted
>>>> that same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>> same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]
#12
----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----

Jason and readers,

The text shared was a draft and I thank Rodolfo for his additional
input. The current version states:

By being able to pass on the native bitstream from the disc to the
receiver, some of these processing steps get bypassed providing the
potential for superior performance. Another possibility is that the chip
sets and codecs used by the receiver are superior to those used in the
player. Based on testing, one of the two or a combination of both is
what my ears experienced.

If anybody is confused needing in depth explanation please let me know.

Thanks

Richard Fisher, HDTV Magazine
A/V Science Editor http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/index.php
Community Director http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum
ISF and HAA certified

Richard Fisher wrote:
> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>
> > Streaming bypasses all the internal player audio track decoding,
> processing,
> > and mixes, and outputs the signal as is read from the disc. The A/V
> > receiver will decode the stream, and usually the chips and decoders
> on A/V
> > Receivers are better than the ones included within the players for
> the same
> > job; which probably is the reason why it sounded a bit better to
> Richard's
> > ears.
>
> That is another possibility although this is the first I have heard of
> this. I can agree to the difference being one of the two or a combination.
>
> For clarity the other one is: the additional processing to PCM for HDMI
> out along with additional slicing and dicing by the receiver for final
> processing.
>
>
> Richard Fisher, HDTV Magazine
> A/V Science Editor http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/index.php
> Community Director http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum
> ISF and HAA certified
>
> Rodolfo La Maestra wrote:
>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Jason,
>>
>> I see you have done quite an analysis, let me complete it, because
>> there are
>> another 11 million early adopters like you that would face a similar
>> situation:
>>
>> I think you already know this, but just in case: Because your TV does not
>> have HDMI inputs you "might" eventually not been able to view in HD some
>> protected HD content, and in such case the audio problem becomes
>> relatively
>> unimportant.
>>
>> I know you want hi-bit audio, but you can always listen DD upgraded at
>> 640Kbps by the BD player (from DD+ and Dolby TrueHD), rather than the
>> typical 384Kbps. That only requires the legacy optical and coax
>> connections
>> and sounds much cleaner than the DD from regular DVD.
>>
>> A/V receivers with HDMI inputs receiving HD protected content would NOT
>> allow you to output 1080i transcoded over component analog connections
>> for
>> your TV. Neither would allow to transcode 480i/p (DVD) to upconvert to
>> 1080i using component analog, but it would allow it using HDMI outputs.
>>
>> Because of the requirement of component analog on your TV, you already
>> know
>> you need to implement two signal paths (and purchase a capable BD
>> player and
>> A/V Receiver), as follows:
>>
>> -----------------------
>> A) The video path of component 1080i analog (or 480i/p when playing
>> regular
>> DVD) directly from the BD player to your TV, and hope that the HD content
>> you are playing is not ICT token protected (if they ever flick the
>> switch),
>> and
>> ----------------------
>>
>> B) A separate audio path from your BD player to your A/V receiver
>> using any
>> of the following three options depending on the equipment (PS3 or
>> otherwise):
>>
>> B.1) 6 analog cables if your player and receiver have the analog
>> connections, and the player decodes the hi-bit audio codec you need.
>> I am
>> not sure about the BD players you have looked at, but my 2006 Sony BDP-S1
>> has the analog audio connections (and also HDMI).
>>
>> B.2) with an HDMI 1.0/.1/.2/.3 connection sending individual PCM
>> channels of
>> the hi-bit audio soundtrack decoded by the BD player, provided the
>> receiver
>> can accept PCM multichannel, or
>>
>> B.3) with a HDMI 1.3 connection streaming hi-bit audio from the BD player
>> for the A/V receiver to decode the stream, which requires HDMI 1.3
>> connections and protocols at both ends, and of course, the A/V
>> receiver with
>> the needed hi-bit audio decoders to do the job.
>> -------------------------
>>
>>
>> On B2 and B3 make sure that the BD player you select allows simultaneous
>> HDMI hi-bit audio output with HD video through the component analog
>> connection. There are players that are said not to allow that, while
>> others
>> are said to allow it, like some Sonys. I believe Richard said that the
>> Panasonic he reviewed reduced the component analog to 480p level.
>>
>> I just talked to Sony to clarify that feature on their newer players,
>> they
>> confirmed that my 2006 player (top of the line then) and the new
>> BDP-S2000ES
>> (top of the line now), DO have the simultaneous feature, but the 300
>> and 500
>> new models do not. However, when you read the operating manuals they say
>> that the feature is there on all of them equally (connecting HDMI for
>> hi-bit
>> audio to the receiver, while sending HD over the component analog,
>> which is
>> exactly the feature you need).
>> ----------------------
>>
>> Until you replace your HDTV for an HDMI capable set, and since you are
>> using
>> two (video and audio) parallel paths among BD player/AV Receiver/TV, you
>> might want to have your universal remote executing parallel commands so
>> their settings are synchronized.
>>
>> In the positive side, maintaining two separate paths allows the HD video
>> wires to be kept as short as needed if you can move the HD video source
>> close to the HDTV, and not make it longer than necessary because of a
>> long
>> audio path to the A/V receiver (if they are in different places, and
>> all is
>> done by HDMI).
>>
>> Regarding processing quality and features of PCM or streaming out,
>> remember
>> that the PCM decoded version contains all the advanced audio mixes of the
>> Blu-ray format, while the streaming version contains only the soundtrack.
>> So if you are into advanced features, rather than sit and view the movie,
>> streaming might not be for you, regardless the implicit quality
>> improvement
>> that is assumed to have.
>>
>> Streaming bypasses all the internal player audio track decoding,
>> processing,
>> and mixes, and outputs the signal as is read from the disc. The A/V
>> receiver will decode the stream, and usually the chips and decoders on
>> A/V
>> Receivers are better than the ones included within the players for the
>> same
>> job; which probably is the reason why it sounded a bit better to
>> Richard's
>> ears.
>>
>> The key difference is the quality of the chip and audio processor (of
>> either
>> the player or the Receiver), and the fact that PCM contains advanced
>> audio
>> mixes which needs the signal to go thru additional stages within the
>> player,
>> while the streaming is not because it excludes the mixes. Add all
>> that in a
>> cocktail mixer and it becomes difficult to determine which is the
>> piece that
>> is responsible for better or worst sounding, because they interact as a
>> package.
>>
>> Regardless who decodes, they both would end up in the Receiver digital
>> domain stage as individual channels for balancing, bass management,
>> and room
>> correction, and to the later typical final conversion to analog for
>> amplification to speaker level voltage, for our analog ears and bone
>> structure to take over.
>>
>> The analog connections option requires that the PCM channels decoded (or
>> read as is on some discs) from the soundtrack stream, be DAC
>> converted, so
>> they can output the player as analog. Then the receiver would convert
>> them
>> back to digital for the balancing, bass management, and room correction
>> mentioned above. So you can say that those two (DAC and ADC) conversions
>> invite audio errors, compared to the full digital connections options
>> above.
>>
>> In other words, if you get a player that has simultaneous analog
>> component
>> 1080i sent to your TV, and HDMI hi-bit audio to the receiver (as PCM
>> or bit
>> stream, or both) you should be set, without any HDMI/to RGB converters
>> added
>> to the system.
>>
>> I thought it was important to explain to you the mixing and feature
>> tradeoffs of the audio options you have, before you assume that streaming
>> and the RGB converter is the way to go.
>>
>> I cover this subject in detail on the 2007 HDTV Technology book, on some
>> multi-channel audio articles on this magazine, and also on the online
>> glossary that Shane would hopefully update soon on the website.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rodolfo La Maestra
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HDTV Magazine Tips List On
>> Behalf Of Jason Burroughs
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 10:48 AM
>> To: HDTV Magazine Tips List
>> Subject: Re: slowly planning for "home theater 2.0"
>>
>>
>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>
>> Actually, I'm finding out that the receiver will not take in HDMI, then
>> output 1080i analog component. This is a key sticking point, because
>> without that, I can't do high definition audio either. The receiver I
>> have doesn't do HDMI, or decode the new formats. That means I need the
>> source (PS3) to do the decoding - but the PS3 doesn't support analog
>> output like the home theater computer does. This puts me in a quandary:
>> with the PS3, I need to pass the video over component video, but the
>> audio over HDMI (assuming I replace the receiver, which necessitates
>> replacing the TV).
>>
>> This strange set of circumstances/gotchas leads me to believe that I
>> can't enjoy high definition audio (Dolby Plus and TrueHD, DTS-HD and MA)
>> without replacing my receiver AND monitor.
>>
>> This would seem to be a pretty big limitation for the PS3 - the
>> inability to use the HD audio tracks on non-HDMI equipped TVs
>> (regardless of the receiver).
>>
>> From the searching I've done, I can't find any blu-ray player with
>> analog outputs. And, even in the home theater computer space, the audio
>> from blu-ray is downsampled to 48khz/16bit! This is something I'm just
>> finding out.
>>
>> So I guess my question is: without an HDMI display, is it possible to
>> use high definition audio tracks? Can I use component video outputs, but
>> still use HDMI to get the audio to the receiver simultaneously?
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> Richard Fisher wrote:
>>
>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>
>>>
>>>> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It
>>>
>>>
>>> seems to
>>>
>>>> have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>>>> sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to replace
>>>> that one quite yet).
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you suggesting the receiver will be able to scale all sources to
>>> 1080i analog video?
>>>
>>>
>>>> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>>>
>>>
>>> issue?
>>>
>>> Nope
>>>
>>>
>>>> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player?
>>>
>>>
>>> It's the safest player out there but only the future knows if it will
>>> support bit stream audio directly from the disc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Richard Fisher
>>> ISF and HAA certified
>>> HD Library is provided by Techservicesusa.com
>>> Publisher http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/index.php
>>>
>>> Jason Burroughs wrote:
>>>
>>>> ----- HDTV Magazine Tips List -----
>>>>
>>>> I'm planning my next generation of home theater, and seeking advice
>>>> on various parts along the way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Current system:
>>>>
>>>> Pioneer Elite Pro-520HD 53" rear projector TV
>>>> Sony STR-DA5ES 6.1 receiver
>>>> Sony 1 channel 100w amp (for 7th channel)
>>>> Paradigm 7.1 channel speaker system (Phantom v3, CC270, ADP170, PD10)
>>>> Custom-built home theater computer
>>>> Dish HD-DVR
>>>>
>>>> After spending 7 years with some form of HTPC, I'm throwing in the
>>>> towel. The variety of buggy software, lack of standards, and a
>>>> million other reasons has led me to purchase a PS3 as a blu-ray
>>>> player, and upgrade my receiver to handle the new audio formats.
>>>> These are my first upgrades I'm considering.
>>>>
>>>> Questions:
>>>>
>>>> Any reason NOT to use a PS3 as my blu-ray player? Anything else
>>>> comparable in price/quality? I don't play video games very often, so
>>>> I don't consider the gaming aspect as a factor.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have feedback on the Sony STR-DA5300ES receiver? It seems
>>>> to have all the features I need, including the ability to take in all
>>>> sources and output 1080i over component to my TV (not ready to
>>>> replace that one quite yet). I've read some great reviews, aside from
>>>> some HDMI handshake issues, which seem to be largely resolved with
>>>> the latest firmware upgrade. Cheapest price I'm finding is $900
>>>> including shipping.
>>>>
>>>> My speakers are 100 watts - will a receiver that is 120 watts be an
>>>> issue?
>>>>
>>>> thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>>> same day) send an email to:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>>> same day) send an email to:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same
>> day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>>
>> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
>> same day) send an email to:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]
>
> To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that
> same day) send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>


To unsubscribe please click: [email protected]

To receive the digest mode (one email a day made from all posted that same day) send an email to:
[email protected]