TUESDAY, MARCH 24,
2003
Dedicated To Making The Most Out Of the HDTV Generation
In This Issue
THE 75th ANNUAL OSCARS:
ABC COMES THROUGH IN 720p
Pete Putman
Reader Mail
Industry News
THE
75th ANNUAL OSCARS:
ABC COMES THROUGH IN 720p
Peter Putman,
CTS
 It had long been known that ABC was planning to broadcast the
Oscars� in high definition this past Sunday night. Still, many viewers were wondering if
the ongoing war in Iraq would disrupt or pre-empt the event altogether.
I
scheduled a small Oscars party for a few couples and laid in a supply of popcorn, soda,
and other comfort food. Assuming the event would proceed as scheduled, I asked my guests
to show up by 8:00 PM (EST).
Precisely
at 8:30 PM (EST), my two HDTV screens opened up with a rather spectacular graphic sequence
in 720p to introduce the program. Small diamond-shaped pictures from older movies flashed
across the screen and the sequence culminated in a stylized Oscar trophy with the numbers
"75" superimposed on it. This was followed by a series of widescreen
establishing shots inside the Kodak Theater, ending with Steve Martin striding to the
lectern. And the 75th Oscars ceremony was under way!
This
telecast was the first to use one of ABC's new HDTV production trucks, and the images were
very crisp and detailed -- more so that those seen in January's Super Bowl. There had been
some question whether ABC would use a 5.1 channel audio mix early on, but that was quickly
dispelled as applause erupted from my rear speakers.
 The evening
progressed pretty much as expected. At one point early on, there was an enormous
low-frequency audio switching 'glitch' that thumped my sub-woofer pretty good and gave
everyone a start! But that was pretty much it as far as technical glitches.
ABC made
good use of numerous camera angles to convey a sense of the size and sweep of the sets
built for the Oscars. In fact, the stage looked like it had been designed for a 16:9
aspect ratio from the start. The large Oscar statues inside and outside the theater had
quite a sheen to them, while the stage sets looked extremely complex.
ABC also
had a few HD cameras working the crowds, sitting right to such actors as Richard Gere,
Adrien Brody, and Salma Hayek. There was a strong sense of intimacy, like you were sitting
right there with the black tie set.
ABC also
delivered some stylish graphics and logos that worked well for widescreen and 4:3 aspect
rations. Remember that this was supposed to be a single-truck production, with all camera
switching and graphics performed at 720p resolution, and a 4:3 aspect ratio conversion
(ARC) taken for the analog broadcast feed.
Steve
Martin and the orchestra kept things moving at a good pace, and the show was helped by a
strong emcee performance by Martin. This was not the case with CBS' otherwise-excellent
Grammys broadcast last month, which seemed a bit disorganized at times at the lectern.
The
close-up HD shots were particularly effective when winners heard their names announced. I
won't soon forget Brody laying a big smooch on Hallie Berry in HD at the lectern! And Kirk
and Michael Douglas hamming it up during the Best Picture presentation was classic TV.
All in
all, a very satisfying evening and a production that shows just how good live 720p can
look. Kudos to ABC for a top-rate job, and I look forward to seeing more live HD from the
alphabet network. (Can't wait for Monday Night Football!)
This story copyright 82003 Peter H. Putman. Used by permission.
Attend this
important conference on Flat Panel Displays
I will be there. Join us.
[Click Image For More
Information]
READER
MAIL:
COMMENTS
ON THE ACADEMY AWARDS
Congratulations
to ABC on an exceptional broadcast this evening.
Dan Farris
Mr.
Wallau I want to thank you for producing the Academy Awards in HDTV. It is a beautiful
spectacular (still going on as I write this). I was pleased that Steve Martin announced at
the beginning that it would be transmitted in HDTV, but taken aback by his next comment
that only "3 guys at Circuit City" would be watching. His comment shows how
little he knows about HDTV because if any retailer has been supportive of HDTV it is Best
Buy, not Circuit City. But it was especially sad to see him promote a tired joke that only
a few people are watching in HDTV. I am watching over Comcast Cable in Montgomery County,
Maryland. From what I hear from the installers, Comcast can't work fast enough to put in
their HDTV boxes. I suspect you will hear from more than "3 guys at Circuit
City" regarding the AA in HDTV.
-Bill Cruce
LA area, 55 miles line of sight over the air... first hour, lots of breakup, very
annoying. 66% signal strength, which is typical of ABC here when it typically comes in
much better than this. Wife is begging to go analog - to no avail, so far. Just went off
for two minutes as Paul Simon began his song.
Bill Zintl
Both
my wife and I were totally impressed with the presentation of the Oscars in Hi def last
night. The color, clarity and brilliance of the picture was beyond expectation.
Sad to say that we are unable to watch the final four in hi def here in Hawaii because of
CBS and NBC local affiliates dragging their feet in delivering the product here in
Hawaii. Way to go ABC!!!
_Bill
Aspengren, Honolulu, Hawaii
Oklahoma
City provided good reception through Cox Cable. I thought it was very good, but not
exceptional. Could it be the difference between 720P and 1080i?
Jack
Dale:
The Academy awards broadcast presented in HDTV was spectacular and breathtaking. I
just got HDTV from Comcast cable and it was great to see what my TV can actually do.
We invited lots of friends over to see the broadcast and they could not believe
their eyes!! I don't see why the networks don't broadcast all of their shows in HD.
I hope the amount of programming picks up within the next few months.
Also, I had Jay Leno on last night and although it appeared to be in High definition, it
was NOT 16x9 widescreen. What gives? Have they changed the aspect ratio to
pander to those with 4:3 sets? I hope not. Please let me know if you have any
information on this.
Richard Keon
Berkeley Investments, Inc.
Boston, MA 02110
I am in Northern VA, Fairfax Station, about 30 miles south of
the White House, channel 39-1, signal strength 94, picture was pristine, some very minor
breakups a couple of times, DD 2CH (converted to Prologic by the pre/pro), first pre-show
hour was 4:3 sandwiched between two black side bars on a 16:9 format package, I was
getting skeptical on that first hour, made me think the show would be that way (as the
super-bowl made me believe, reason I quit watching).
The content was spectacular and HD is perfect for this, Steve Martin was not as I was
expecting though, many odd comments/jokes.
Sorry that Bill and the others could not have an enjoyable event, I agree with the comment
that HD should be flawless otherwise people would feel like taking their old tubes out of
the closets, and those will be angry in 2007 when they find out there is no more analog in
the air to tune to, they would love the FCC.
There should be no reason for a signal in the 66% strength (Bill) to arrive compromised.
My channels breakups happen on 35-45 signal strength range on channels that are 80 miles
away in Baltimore, MD, exacerbated by wind or snow on the roof (attic antenna).
If you add to those the people that could not get enough signal strength to lock the tuner
into it, we might end up with people believing that this a minority technology or that the
system is still in prototyping stages, and that should not be allowed for the future of
HD.
I am not feeding 8SVB to the lions, I know Sinclair is still hungry, I am just stating the
obvious from an end user point of view.
My reception has been almost perfect for almost 5 years, except for those channels 80
miles away, the analog feed version of those (11 and 13) is horrible and snowy, using the
same antenna/amp, but when I get a lock on the digital feed version it comes as pristine
as from a local station.
Is the miracle of ones and zeros, as long as they can hit the antenna that is all the
tuner needs to reconstruct the signal as perfect as it was sent, try that with analog. On
the other hand I can still watch a snowy content with analog, not a black screen.
HD is about quality, but who cares about quality if you can not even watch the evening
news. As much as I hate cable they have the potential to become a solution for many with
antenna reception problems, and perhaps be the savior of the technology.
Back to the Oscars, thanks ABC, I watched the 1080i converted version of your 720p feed,
but still good quality.
I am interested to know the bit rate and horizontal resolution of the feed, network and
affiliate. The reason I am asking is because there was another sub-channel slot 39-2,
apparently unused, and I would like to know if it actually took any bandwidth from the
actual 39-1 Oscar's feed.
----------- WETA -----------
(Sorry WETA, I supported you in 1999 for your leadership in HD, but now?)
I do not quite understand why WETA PBS has recently received an award this year when they
changed to full multi-casting with four sub-channels running all the time, and the sub
27-1 channel, which time ago was the 16:9 dedicated HD channel, has obviously suffered in
quality.
Does this deserve an award? couldn't this be viewed as an incentive for others to do the
same? if the a non-profit public television is doing it what tools do we have left to
deter other commercial stations to do it as well? Are we going backwards in this area?
__Rodolfo La Maestra, VA
HDTV
will die on the vine if this keeps up like this. Wife went to the bedroom to watch analog.
This is what I bought the JVC 30k for? I also noticed no dropouts during commercials.
_Donald Nash
The
show has been outstanding here in the Baltimore, MD area. This is the kind of show that is
tailor-made for HD. Too bad the movie clips and montages were edited together in SD.
Todd Tracey
Pasadena, MD
The
picture looked great on my 17" Samsung LCD monitor and the show was excellent. My
only criticism, the numerous momentary freezing of the image throughout the show. I
estimate it must have occurred at least 50 times. I am not sure if this is secondary to
the signal from the local ABC network (Los Angeles) or a national problem.
Richard Miller M.D.
I
don't know whether it was Time-Warner cable, the LA affiliate of ABC, or the network
itself, but there were signal problems during the Academy Awards. There was an occasional
snap in the 5 channel sound about once a minute for the first 45 minutes of the broadcast.
Also, the picture and sound would go off for 2-3 seconds every 30-60 seconds. This problem
lasted throughout the broadcast.
Neil
Huntington Beach, Ca
Dale,
And the winner for best HDTV production is...
ABC TV and the 75th Academy Awards Presentation!
Who cares if the show is long, when it's in HDTV!
Mark Zimmer
Oklahoma City
I
was very disappointed with the awards show. I live in the Los Angeles Area and most nights
I am able to pick up programming from ABC just fine. Tonight the picture kept dropping
out, I finally had to change the channel to DirecTV Local 7 (ABC). I had my neighbor over
the house and my brother to see the show. When is DirecTV going to start broadcasting in
High-Def? Sometimes it is great, but most of the time my TV is only good for movies on
DVD. I appreciate HDNET and the Sports that are offered on 198, but something has to
change. Isn't ESPN going to start broadcasting in HD soon? Is DirecTV going to start
carrying that? On what channel and am I going to have to go out and buy another LNB for my
dish, I have two and need another just to get Showtime; if I had it. I am very frustrated
with the whole thing, the process is taking to long to unfold. About the only good thing
is HDTV MAGAZINE, keep up the good work.
Robert Morales
Dale
Im a big fan of Mr. Wallau and his support for HDTV.
But tonights broadcast in LA was a disaster. The first hour, the entire 5.1
audio, was on life support. A huge blast three minutes into the
broadcast that about destroyed my system (definitely my eardrums), and for the next hour
all we heard was pops and crackles in the rears.
Once that got fixed about an hour in, the video went haywire.
We got A/V locks (freezes) about every 60 seconds if not more throughout the rest
of the broadcast. At one point it locked seven times in one minute!! My wife
made me switch over to SD five times (I kept hoping and switching back to HD). We
missed many of Steve Martins jokes and the acceptance speeches. These same
problems have been reported on the AVS forum from people all over LA.
Got the same problems on TWC and OTA (Samsung 165). Did
record the OTA if Alex would like to pass on to the GM of the station, as the GM was
probably at the show while the fort burned. Some heads should roll on this one.
Or send the GM over to my couch and make him watch all three and one half hours!!
Hell quit first. An engineer at KABC told me several months ago that
they under bought when they got the digital transmitter and thats why
they typically have so many problems??
Having said all this, KABC-DT has been off the air most of the
time since the beginning of the war coverage, so we have had to watch other nets and I
like Peter Jennings. TWC had them off the air for two days this week!!!
Thanks, Alex, for your support and keep the HD coming
..
Most of the time your stuff is great and we really appreciate the 5.1 sound!
What a difference HDTV makes. Let's have more! The
economy would certainly be stimulated if more programming would be available in
HDTV. Everyone would be rushing out to buy the means to view rather than
waiting. We love our plasma and want more programming in High Definition.
_Reid
My quick comments on a spectacularly visual show:
No disappointment on the quality of the show--the wife and
in-laws were guardedly impressed, and I was ecstatic. However, I suffered great ridicule
about 45 minutes into the show when the audio cut out for a few minutes during/after
an ad--my mother-in-law had turned down the sound and I couldn't figure out what button
she had pressed while she defended her actions and my wife & father-in-law launched
into a joint diatribe regarding the unneeded complexity of my home theater system and
its questionable value relative to the headaches it created. I eventually discovered that
it was the broadcast audio and not my system (nor user error), after switching over from
the HD terrestrial broadcast to the standard def satellite broadcast and discovering that
audio was still present.
Now, I understand that there are certainly some domestic social
issues at play here, but it is yet another demonstration as to how far we have to go
to get both reliable signals in HDTV and, perhaps more importantly, user friendly systems
to display them. When my wife, in a show of protest, decided to go watch upstairs on the
TV she knew would work, it demonstrates that the HD advantages are still somewhat
precarious in the scope of all the obstacles/complications involved.
The picture quality in San Francisco was absolutely
beautiful. Sound was 5.1 throughout. However in the beginning of the program,
the center channel
didn't sound good. It was echoy (is that a word?) and muffled. That fixed
itself later in the program. Great job ABC.
Bobby C
To Mr. Alex Wallau c/o Dale Cripps
Thanks for the "heads up" regarding the HDTV broadcast
of the Oscars last night. Our 25-year old daughter asked, "Will the Oscars be
in HDTV?" "I regretted to have to answer no, it's on ABC."
We receive all the major networks, plus HBO-HD and Discovery HD
Theater via terrestrial and satellite means. Sinclair Broadcasting owns our ABC
affiliate, WXLV-TV in Winston-Salem, NC.
They have converted to digital for legal compliance, but all
over the US, viewers like us are deprived of high definition signals by the
"stonewalling" Sinclair group. In my opinion, they are
depriving their viewers of the "public convenience" that their FCC
license requires.
Is there any pressure that ABC can apply to Sinclair to motivate
their dropping their ridiculous case of opposing the current HD standard and moving to
serve their viewers with HDTV as affiliates of all the other networks have already
done?
Many thanks for anything you can do on behalf of ABC's
viewers. And congratulations on your new truck!
Sincerely,
Ed Booker
Greensboro, NC
WAR AND HDTV
"NBC
has reportedly suspended HD transmissions as a result of the attack on Iraq, presumably to
use the satellite capacity for more news feeds."
Four
days ago I asked you what the war might mean to the HDTV markets and movement. In other
words, will it be an influence for or against HDTV? But the war carries such an emotional
charge that the mere mention of it sends people to answering questions they thought I had
asked (or implied) rather than the simple one with a singular reason that was asked. In
some cases I was taken to task for having the insensitivity to even mention anything
related to it. Some questioned how I could be so stupid as to have HDTV and the war
mentioned in the same breath? "There is no connection!" Your comments below are
noteworthy and I include them here along with my own thoughts. Keep in mind that no matter
what arises there are those who must make billion dollar decisions in order to keep HDTV
rolling.There will be many things surviving the war...but only if they are supported
during it. Any major influence must be evaluated to see where it may apply pressure for or
against any pre-event movement, and, indeed, things like a prolonged war could produce
conditions which either favor or discourage HDTV. With this in mind I had asked the
question. If the responses are of any interest to you I will ask you to go to the web at
this address http://ilovehdtv.com/hdtvquestion.html
INDUSTRY
NEWS
DirecTV
Discloses HD Info
From Timothy Logue, Washington, DC
DirecTV recently responded to inquiries from the Federal Communications Commission
concerning its high-definition TV efforts, including an assessment of the number of HD
set-top boxes deployed and how the high-def business is going for the satellite TV
service.
In a letter detailing HD happenings, DirecTV told commission officials that it has 180,000
active subscribers with HD set-top boxes. The company also told the agency about 260,000
HD set-top boxes have been shipped.
DirecTV told the FCC that it anticipates rolling out 30,000 to 50,000 HD-DVR set-top boxes
in 2003 and 2004, with the bulk of shipments in 2004. Actual volumes for the product,
which allows for the digital recording of programming, will depend on consumer demand,
DirecTV said.
DirecTV also commented on the use of ATSC tuners in HD set-top boxes. The company told FCC
staff that its HD models can receive over-the-air ATSC broadcasts as effectively as other
ATSC devices.
The follow-up letter came two weeks after DirecTV executives met with commission officials
on issues concerning the delivery of local stations via satellite. Satellite interests
have been eyeing efforts at the commission and on Capitol Hill concerning the Satellite
Home Viewer Improvement Act, which is up for renewal in 2004.
DirecTV is not alone in its HD talk. In early February, EchoStar Chairman Charlie Ergen
met with FCC commissioners to discuss concerns with a requirement that would force
satellite operators to carry local broadcast signals in high-definition. According to a
FCC filing, Ergen also discussed the possibility of requiring delivery of locals on a
single-dish, as well as consolidation in the media marketplace.
The
FCC receiver standards inquiry - Mark Schubin
The FCC receiver standards inquiry has now been officially released. Here
are excerpts from the DTV section:
"What
minimum interference immunity parameter values should be specified for DTV broadcast
receivers and how would those minimums compare to the performance of existing equipment
used in this service?"
"What
would be the additional costs to consumers of DTV receivers that would provide
interference immunity as specified in established guidelines?"
"How
should consumers be informed of differences in broadcast receiver interference
immunity performance?"
-"We
also ask for comment on an approach that would provide a fast-track for the development
and implementation of voluntary receiver performance standards for broadcast DTV
receivers. Television broadcast industry representatives, including the National
Association of Broadcasters (NAB), the Association for Maximum Service Television (MSTV),
and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. (Sinclair), have requested that we impose minimum
performance thresholds on DTV receivers with respect to receiver sensitivity (noise figure
and carrier-to-noise ratio), selectivity (co-channel and adjacent channel
desired-to-undesired signal ratios), dynamic range, and multipath tolerance (adaptive
equalizer performance).
"While
we have denied these requests in the context of mandatory performance standards, and are
herein dismissing a Petition for Reconsideration in this regard from Sinclair, we do
believe that it is important that we continue to encourage manufacturers to provide
adequate tuning capability for broadcast DTV signals, to monitor the performance of DTV
receivers as they are introduced to the market, and to intervene if performance is found
lacking in specific areas.
We
also believe that DTV receiver specifications may be useful in this effort as voluntary
standards. In this regard, we believe there could be benefit to an approach that would
encourage the development of minimum performance guidelines for DTV receivers and enable
manufacturers to market a special category of receivers that meet such guidelines.
"Under
the approach we are suggesting, industry parties representing broadcasters, consumer
electronics manufacturers, consumers, and others as appropriate, would identify the
relevant DTV receiver performance parameters, develop appropriate minimum performance
specifications for those parameters, and publish them.
Receivers
that meet these specifications could then be clearly marked with a recognizable label or
symbol to identify them as complying with industry accepted standards for quality
reception. Such identification would allow consumers to easily identify high performance
products and manufacturers/ retailers to emphasize the features of those products to
encourage consumers to purchase them.
"As
part of this approach, the Commission could include reference to the minimum performance
standards in its rules and provide that only models that comply with these voluntary
standards could be marketed as complying with the industry standards for performance
quality or other terminology as might be defined through our rule making process.
We
request comment on this approach and suggestions for alternative approaches that would
provide for implementation of minimum performance specifications for DTV receivers on a
voluntary basis. We also request comment on the timeframes that would be required for an
industry group to develop recommendations for improved receiver performance.
"We
recognize that digital broadcast tuners will soon become mandatory in many television
receivers and the corresponding need to move expeditiously if these standards are to be
available in a timely fashion. We request comment on whether an industry group tasked
with developing receiver guidelines could be convened within a three month period, and
whether recommendations could be developed within six to nine months after that. We will
also continue to encourage the inclusion of adequate reception quality in DTV receivers
and to monitor the performance of DTV receivers in this regard through efforts to be
conducted by our DTV Task Force, Media Bureau, and Office of Engineering and
Technology."
<http://www.hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-54A6.doc>
THE
DIGITAL LANDSCAPE TO BE EXPLORED AT NAB2003
WASHINGTON, DC - Radio and television broadcasters will survey new opportunities offered
by digital technologies during the Digital Landscape session track at NAB2003 on Sunday,
April 6. Digital television and radio both made their debuts at past NAB conventions.
Moving forward, NAB2003's Digital Landscape will focus on where broadcasters go from here.
The sessions will explore new revenue opportunities and new partnerships and provide
stations with guidance on how to incorporate their digital facilities into long-range
business plans. Composed of two separate sessions for television and radio, this series
will conclude with a reception showcasing exhibitors offering products for broadcasters'
digital plans. The digital television (DTV) session will feature opening remarks by
Richard E. Wiley, partner, Wiley Rein & Fielding, following which a panel will explore
new revenue opportunities offered by DTV. The session will be moderated by Gary Arlen,
president, Arlen Communications and panelists will include Michael DeClue, vice president
& director of engineering, Clear Channel Communications; Patrick Griffis, director of
worldwide media standards, Microsoft Corporation; Lakish Hatalkar, emerging media
strategist, Proctor & Gamble; and Sam Matheny, vice president & general manager,
WRAL/DTV Plus. With transmitters for digital radio introduced last year at NAB2002 and
receivers being introduced this year, HD Radio(tm) is still in its infancy. Opening
remarks at the Digital AM & FM Radio: The Future Begins Now session will be provided
by Jeff Jury, senior vice president, iBiquity Digital Corporation, the developer of the
digital radio technology, HD Radio(tm). Scott Stull, director of Broadcast Business
Development and Joe D'Angelo, director, PAC and Wireless Data Business Development, both
of iBiquity, will speak about rollout and benefits of HD Radio(tm). Following their
presentations will be a panel of experts from related industries. Panelists are Bob Law,
senior vice president, Kenwood USA; Jury from iBiquity; Tom Ray, corporate director of
engineering, Buckley Broadcasting/WOR; and Gregg Thomas, merchandise manager for Moblie
Electronics and Wireless, Ultimate Electronics. Exhibitors participating in the reception
following the sessions are Broadcast Electronics, Inc.; DTV Plus; Harris Corporation;
iBiquity; NDS Americas, Inc.; SpectraRep; Triveni Digital; Tune to TV; VBox
Communications, Ltd. and Orban/CRL. NAB2003 takes place April 5 - 10 in Las Vegas
(exhibits open April 7). It is the world's largest electronic media show covering the
development, delivery and management of professional video and audio content across all
mediums. Complete NAB2003 details are available at www.nab.org/conventions/nab2003. The
National Association of Broadcasters is a full-service trade association that promotes and
protects free, over-the-air local radio and television stations' interests in Washington
and around the world. NAB is the broadcaster's voice before Congress, federal agencies,
and the courts. NAB also serves a growing number of associate and international
broadcaster members. Information about NAB can be found at www.nab.org
<http://www.nab.org>.
Premier
Retail Networks will deliver customized HD programming to 870 Sears stores, targeted by
geographic region and store:
<http://www.broadcastnewsroom.com/2003/03_mar/news/cw_prn_sears.htm>
More tomorrow.....
This publication is supported entirely by
subscriptions. It is the outgrowth of the HDTV Newsletter, the industry
"bible"for 15 years during the development period of the standard for DTV.
While the Newsletter was very successful in that it
reached everyone around the world who was involved with HDTV, I always poured more into it
than could be taken out. The time to pay the "piper" has arrived and we need you
support more than ever. If this publication is going to be significant into the future we
must have a very rapid growth of readership. Please help make us known. For ten cents a
day we must be the HDTV bargain in the marketplace. Of course, you say, there is all of
this free information around. How free is it? How sound is it? Will it be there later when
the movement needs a proactive force?
HDTV Magazine was designed to reach ahead of the
market and draw ever-larger bodies of people into the HDTV experience. The Internet
is the chief means for rapid expansion of a good idea, especially when it is propelled by
a growing enthusiasm. There are few market impediments left to slow things down other than
salesmanship and the education of the general public. If given a chance this magazine can
burst out onto the national scene and with the aid of those already educated, educate the
rest and encourage their participation in this reviving of the television experience.
Please help us expand. When you consider whether $35 is an appropriate amount to spend in
the support of HDTV consider the billions of dollars which have already gone into one of
the riskiest speculations in modern times. Join HDTV Magazine today. With each
subscription we are reducing the risk we have already taken. Click on the crest below.
***
We are on a subscription drive, so make
sure your friends, co-workers, and family members see the HDTV Magazine. We are just
getting warmed up. Click the crest button below and fill in the simple form. You are then
inserted automatically on our list server with all privileges.
Order HDTV Magazine
A Daily Publication in support of
the HDTV transition.
http://www.ilovehdtv.com/
[email protected]
Exclusive to I Love HDTV
http://www.ilovehdtv.com/
Copyright 1998 -2003
All Rights Reserved
|
