akirby wrote: Of course they had parts issues - no company expects to have that many failures within such a short period. They couldn't have possibly planned for something like that. While it's frustrating I don't see how it can be deemed poor customer service.
The poor customer service lies in the fact that...
You call, they read from script, your told when your parts are expected to ship.
You call back for status, they read from a script and they have no knowledge of your last call. They tell you your parts are on back-order but will be "expedited". It's just lip service - there is no such thing as
expedited. Maybe you feel better being told this as you have no knowledge of their tactics (yet).
You call again for status, they read from a script and they have no knowledge of your last TWO CALLS now or that you were told your parts were expedited. You're now told your parts are delayed another month but will NOW be expedited. You're upset and ask to speak with a supervisor, they say none are available, sum1 will call you within 1 business day. You never get a call back.
You call again for status on the parts and the lack of supervisor call-back, they read from a script and know about at least one of your previous calls (maybe) but have no record that you asked to speak with a supervisor. Your told the parts are still a month away but have been expedited. AGAIN, you ask to speak with a supervisor and AGAIN they say none are available, sum1 will call you within 1 business day. You never get a call back.
On and on it goes. Eventually, you might get to speak with a supervisor (it took me about 10 calls!). Now you're getting somewhere right? Nope.. the supervisor has the same info (less scripted) and still serves up the same lip service of prioritizing, expediting, blaming your tech service, etc.
I'm sorry, but this riga-ma-role is not simply frustrating, it's the gold standard with them and wholly ridiculous - full of lost information, mis-information and out-right lies. THAT's how it can be deemed "poor customer service".
akirby wrote: So no, I don't have a problem with how Mitsubishi handled this
You don't? Perhaps you should go look for an '06 model DLP 73" and begin to feel the pain of this issue firsthand as you obviously can't understand the magnitude of it.
While I agree that they could not have planned for the issues - it's 2008 and we're talking about 2005 and 2006 model televisions which they KNOW are failing and have extended the warranties on. Even without a plan, do you mean to say, all through 2006 & 2007 they could not manufacture enough replacement parts?? Please.
How about if they
know about an issue to maybe escalate production of the failing parts to meet the demand?
akirby wrote: In fact, I'm impressed.
There are people on this board who have waited 6 months or more for a part replacement and some STILL waiting. Through it all, they were lied to, mis-informed, delayed, promised things that never happened and repeatedly put off. Oh Yeh - that's impressive!
Hats off and kudos to Mitsubishi!
Gimme' a break...